Dollar Tree Class Action, Shopper Says the Receipt Printed Too Much of Her Credit Card Number and Federal Law Prohibits It

A North Carolina shopper filed a class action lawsuit against Dollar Tree Inc. in early 2026, accusing the discount retail chain of printing more than the legally permitted number of credit card digits on customer receipts — a violation of a federal identity theft protection law that has been in force since 2006. The case currently sits in North Carolina state court after a federal judge found the plaintiff lacked sufficient standing to proceed in federal court and sent it back. No settlement has been reached.

FieldDetail
Case NameMurphy v. Dollar Tree Inc.
CourtSuperior Court of Buncombe County, North Carolina (NC Business Court designation)
Case Number25CV006137
Date FiledFebruary 2026
DefendantDollar Tree Inc.
Lead PlaintiffMarilena Murphy
Alleged ViolationFair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA), 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(g)(1)
Products / Services AffectedIn-store credit and debit card purchases at Dollar Tree retail locations
Geographic ScopeNationwide class
SettlementNone — litigation phase only
Claim Form AvailableNo
Plaintiffs’ AttorneysTBD

A Dollar Tree Receipt Printed Too Much. A Law Passed in 2003 Says That’s Illegal.

Dollar Tree operates more than 16,000 stores across the United States, processing millions of credit and debit card transactions every day. Every one of those transactions generates a receipt — and every one of those receipts must comply with federal rules about what card information can appear on paper.

Plaintiff Marilena Murphy filed a class action lawsuit accusing Dollar Tree of violating the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act by printing more than the last five digits of its customers’ credit and debit card numbers on receipts. Murphy alleges her own receipt from a Dollar Tree purchase showed more card digits than the law allows — putting her, and potentially millions of other shoppers, at unnecessary risk.

Dollar Tree initially moved the case to federal court, but a judge ruled the court did not have jurisdiction over the case because the plaintiff did not show a concrete injury required for federal standing. The case was then remanded to North Carolina state court. It now proceeds in the Superior Court of Buncombe County, designated to the North Carolina Business Court.

What Dollar Tree’s Receipts Allegedly Showed — and Why the Law Draws the Line at Five Digits

The specific allegation centers on a federal truncation requirement that has been in effect since December 1, 2006. FACTA law prohibits merchants from printing more than the last five digits of the card number or the expiration date on any electronically printed credit or debit card receipt. The requirement exists because the Federal Trade Commission has stated that credit card numbers on sales receipts are a “golden ticket” for fraudsters and identity thieves.

The complaint alleges Dollar Tree’s point-of-sale systems printed receipts that exceeded that five-digit limit — exposing digits beyond what the law permits. Under FACTA, any person who willfully violates this provision is liable for actual damages or statutory damages ranging from $100 to $1,000 per receipt violation, plus punitive damages and attorney’s fees. With millions of transactions processed across Dollar Tree’s store network each year, a willful violation finding could expose the company to substantial liability.

Related article: Ford Recalls Nearly 48,000 Vehicles After EGR Valve Defect Puts Drivers at Risk of Sudden Power Loss

Ford Recalls Nearly 48,000 Vehicles After EGR Valve Defect Puts Drivers at Risk of Sudden Power Loss Ford has pulled nearly 48,000 model year 2025 vehicles off the road safety list after a manufacturing flaw in the exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) valve was found to cause sudden, unexpected loss of engine power — a condition federal regulators at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration have linked to an elevated crash risk. The NHTSA announced the recall on March 16, 2026, covering vehicles across ten Ford and Lincoln model lines. No injuries or accidents have been reported yet, but the repair itself isn't ready — and won't be until around September 2026. The Defect and Why It Matters Inside the EGR valve, a small component called the poppet head can detach from the valve body due to inconsistent laser welding during production at Korens, a South Korean supplier. When that happens, exhaust gas floods back into the engine at levels it was never designed to handle. The result, in Ford's own words, is a loss of motive power — meaning the engine can stop delivering drive force to the wheels with little or no warning. Drivers may notice the problem through weak acceleration, engine vibration, difficulty starting the vehicle, or a check engine light coming on. In more severe cases, the vehicle can stall entirely. NHTSA's concern is that this is most likely to happen at low speeds — under about 12 mph — but the agency flagged higher-speed stalling as a possibility based on warranty claims Ford received as the investigation expanded. For most drivers, a sudden stall in traffic is dangerous enough. For Bronco and Bronco Sport owners who take these vehicles off-road, through water crossings, or onto high-speed highways, a mid-drive power loss creates a more complicated set of risks — which is part of why this recall has drawn attention beyond the usual recall coverage. How Ford Found Out Ford's Critical Concern Review Group opened an investigation in July 2025 after receiving five warranty claims about EGR valve poppet heads detaching on vehicles with fewer than 6,000 miles on them. That's a remarkably low mileage threshold — most mechanical defects don't surface that quickly. Ford replicated the failure in a test vehicle, continued tracking incoming claims, and found that many of those owners were reporting an outright loss of power. That pattern is what pushed the investigation toward a full recall. Ford has stated it is not aware of any accidents, injuries, or fires connected to this defect. That said, the absence of reported crashes doesn't mean the condition isn't dangerous — it may simply mean owners pulled over or the stall happened in a low-consequence situation. Every Model Covered by This Recall All affected vehicles are 2025 model year and equipped with 1.5-liter, 2.0-liter, or 2.3-liter EcoBoost engines. The recall covers the Ford Mustang, Bronco, Bronco Sport, Ranger, Explorer, Escape, Maverick, Edge (now discontinued), Lincoln Nautilus, and Lincoln Corsair. If you own any of these models from the 2025 model year, checking your VIN is the fastest way to confirm whether your specific vehicle is included. No Fix Yet — Here's What to Do in the Meantime This is where the situation gets frustrating for owners. Engineers are still developing the remedy, and replacement EGR valve assemblies are not expected to be available at dealerships until around September 2026. Ford has not issued a stop-drive order, so owners are not being told to park their vehicles — but that doesn't mean you should ignore the warning signs if they appear. Here is what you should do right now: Check your VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls or Ford.com to confirm whether your vehicle is included. Your 17-digit VIN is printed on the driver's side doorframe, the lower corner of your windshield, or on your registration paperwork. Ford is sending two letters to affected owners. The first went out the week of March 16, 2026, letting owners know the defect has been identified. The second will follow once the repair is finalized, which is expected in September 2026. If you haven't received anything and your VIN is listed, call Ford directly at 1-866-436-7332 and reference recall number 26S10. If your vehicle starts showing any of the symptoms — weak acceleration, engine shaking, trouble starting, or a check engine warning — stop driving it and take it to a Ford or Lincoln dealership immediately. Don't wait for the September letter. When the repair does become available, Ford will cover it completely at no cost through authorized dealers. If you've already paid out of pocket for a repair connected to this issue, ask your dealer about reimbursement eligibility. Ford's Broader Quality Problem This recall doesn't exist in a vacuum. Ford set a record for the most recalls issued by any manufacturer in a single year in 2025, and already leads all automakers in 2026 with 19 recalls issued so far according to NHTSA. Company executives have publicly acknowledged they are still paying the price for quality issues that accumulated across recent model years. This EGR valve recall — affecting brand-new vehicles with under 6,000 miles — fits that pattern. No lawsuits or class action filings tied specifically to this recall have been announced as of publication. Frequently Asked Questions Which vehicles are covered by this recall? All ten are 2025 model year vehicles: the Ford Mustang, Bronco, Bronco Sport, Ranger, Explorer, Escape, Maverick, Edge, Lincoln Nautilus, and Lincoln Corsair. All carry EcoBoost engines in 1.5-liter, 2.0-liter, or 2.3-liter configurations. How do I know if my specific vehicle is included? Look up your 17-digit VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls or at Ford.com. Your VIN is on the driver's side doorframe, the lower left corner of your windshield (visible from outside the car), or on your insurance card and vehicle registration. Is it safe to keep driving my vehicle right now? Ford has not issued a stop-drive order. However, if you experience weak acceleration, engine vibration, difficulty starting, or a check engine light, stop driving immediately and contact a Ford or Lincoln dealership. Those are the signs the valve may have already failed in your vehicle. What are the warning signs that the defect has already occurred? The primary symptoms are weak acceleration, engine vibration, a no-start condition, or an illuminated check engine light. In more serious cases the engine may stall entirely while driving. When will the repair be available? Replacement EGR valve assemblies are not expected to reach dealerships until approximately September 2026. Ford will send a second notification letter to affected owners once the remedy is confirmed and parts are available. Will the repair cost me anything? No. Once the remedy is available, Ford and Lincoln dealerships will perform the repair free of charge. If you have already paid for a related repair, contact your dealer to ask about reimbursement. Who do I contact if I have questions now? Call Ford's recall hotline at 1-866-436-7332 and reference internal recall number 26S10. You can also reach NHTSA's consumer safety hotline at 1-888-327-4236 or file a complaint at nhtsa.gov. Last Updated: March 25, 2026. This article is for informational purposes only. Always follow official guidance from Ford Motor Company and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration for the most current recall instructions.

Murphy does not allege her credit card was actually stolen or used fraudulently. The lawsuit rests on the statutory violation itself — and the question of whether that technical violation causes enough legal harm to sustain a class action is already shaping how and where this case proceeds.

The Law Murphy Claims Dollar Tree Broke

  • Federal truncation requirement under FACTA (Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003, 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(g)(1)) — Congress passed this law to fight identity theft by requiring merchants to mask all but the last five digits of a card number on printed receipts. Expiration dates must be completely omitted. The rule applies to any electronically printed receipt at the point of sale or transaction — not to handwritten or emailed receipts.
  • Willful noncompliance provisions (Fair Credit Reporting Act, as amended by FACTA) — Damages for “negligent” noncompliance are limited to actual injuries, such as identity theft. “Willful” noncompliance carries damages of $100 to $1,000 per receipt violation, as well as punitive damages. Murphy’s complaint alleges willful conduct, which triggers the higher damage tier.

Every Dollar Tree Customer Who Paid by Card Could Potentially Be Part of This

You may be affected if:

  • You made a credit card or debit card purchase at any Dollar Tree retail location in the United States
  • You received a printed receipt at the point of sale showing more than the last five digits of your card number
  • The receipt was printed electronically — not handwritten
  • You made your purchase at any point during the class period (precise dates TBD pending court filings)

No action is required right now. Save any Dollar Tree receipts you still have from credit or debit card purchases — particularly any that show more than five card digits — as these may matter if a settlement is reached.

Dollar Tree Has Not Responded Publicly

Dollar Tree Inc. has not issued a public statement in response to this lawsuit as of March 25, 2026. AllAboutLawyer.com will update this article when a company response becomes available.

Dollar Tree may argue, as retailers have done in similar FACTA cases, that any excess digit printing resulted from a system configuration issue rather than intentional conduct — which would push the case toward the lower negligence standard rather than willful violation. The company may also challenge whether Murphy’s claims clear the standing threshold in state court, as the federal court already found the federal standard was not met.

What Comes Next in This Case

  • Dollar Tree files its response. The company will answer the complaint or move to dismiss in North Carolina state court. Expect arguments over whether the alleged violation constitutes actionable harm under state law.
  • Standing fight continues. The federal court already dismissed for lack of concrete injury. Dollar Tree will likely press a similar argument in state court — and the outcome of that argument will determine whether this case moves forward at all.
  • Discovery begins if the case survives. Plaintiffs would seek Dollar Tree’s point-of-sale system records, receipt configuration data, and internal communications about FACTA compliance across all store locations.
  • Class certification motion. Murphy’s attorneys must persuade the court to formally certify the case as a class action on behalf of all similarly situated customers — a contested and critical stage.
  • Settlement or trial. Large retailers facing FACTA class actions have historically negotiated settlements when the standing question resolves in plaintiffs’ favor. This case is too early in its lifecycle to project that outcome. This page will be updated as the case develops.

Important Case Dates

MilestoneDate
Lawsuit FiledFebruary 2026
Federal Court Remand to State CourtFebruary–March 2026
Defendant Answer DueTBD
Discovery PeriodTBD
Class Certification HearingTBD
Trial Date (if set)TBD
Settlement (if reached)TBD

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Dollar Tree receipt lawsuit real?

 Yes. Murphy v. Dollar Tree Inc., Case No. 25CV006137, is an active class action filed in the Superior Court of Buncombe County, North Carolina and designated to the North Carolina Business Court. Law360 reported the filing on February 20, 2026. No settlement has been reached.

Can I file a claim against Dollar Tree right now?

 No. The lawsuit has not been certified as a class action, and no settlement fund or claim process exists. If the case is certified and a settlement is later reached, class members will receive notice with instructions for participating.

Do I need a lawyer to join this lawsuit?

 No. If the case certifies and a settlement is reached, you would receive notice and could file a claim without hiring your own attorney. If you believe you have a Dollar Tree receipt showing more than five card digits, you may also consult a consumer protection attorney independently.

What happens if the case settles?

 A federal judge — or in this instance, a North Carolina state court judge — must approve any settlement. Class members would then receive notice explaining their options: file a claim for compensation, opt out and preserve the right to sue separately, or object to the settlement terms.

Will I get notified if there is a settlement?

 Likely yes, if Dollar Tree’s records identify you as a customer who received a non-compliant receipt. You can improve your chances of receiving notice by retaining any Dollar Tree receipts from credit or debit card purchases that show more than five card digits.

How does FACTA protect credit card users at checkout?

 FACTA prohibits any person who accepts credit cards or debit cards for business transactions from printing more than the last five digits of the card number or the expiration date on any receipt provided to the cardholder at the point of sale. The rule applies to electronically printed receipts only — not handwritten ones. A compliant receipt looks like: ***********12345, with no expiration date shown at all.

Why did the case get kicked out of federal court and sent back to state court? 

Multiple federal appeals courts have held that simply receiving a receipt with too many card digits — without any actual identity theft or fraud — does not constitute a “concrete injury” sufficient for federal court standing. A federal judge ruled the plaintiff did not show the concrete injury required for federal standing and remanded the case to North Carolina state court, where the standing standard differs. State courts have more flexibility in recognizing statutory violations as actionable harm.

What dollar amount could class members receive if the case settles? 

FACTA sets statutory damages at $100 to $1,000 per willful violation — meaning per non-compliant receipt. In practice, FACTA class action settlements have varied widely. Individual payouts depend on the total number of class members, the settlement amount negotiated, and court-approved fees. No amount is confirmed or predictable at this stage.

Sources & References

Last Updated: March 25, 2026

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Legal claims and outcomes depend on specific facts and applicable law. For advice regarding a particular situation, consult a qualified attorney.

About the Author

Sarah Klein, JD

Sarah Klein, JD, is a licensed attorney and legal content strategist with over 12 years of experience across civil, criminal, family, and regulatory law. At All About Lawyer, she covers a wide range of legal topics — from high-profile lawsuits and courtroom stories to state traffic laws and everyday legal questions — all with a focus on accuracy, clarity, and public understanding.
Her writing blends real legal insight with plain-English explanations, helping readers stay informed and legally aware.
Read more about Sarah

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *