Arrival SA’s $13.3M SPAC Fraud Settlement Is Finally Approved, What It Means for Investors Who Bought In on the EV Dream
Investors in bankrupt electric vehicle company Arrival SA received final approval on March 25, 2026 for their nearly $13.3 million settlement — ending a lawsuit that accused the once-hyped British EV startup of selling investors a fictitious vision of AI-powered microfactories and double-digit profit margins before its business collapsed, its stock cratered, and the company filed for bankruptcy. The claim filing deadline was February 24, 2026. Investors who filed valid claims before that date will receive their pro-rata share of the net settlement fund after processing is complete.
| Field | Detail |
| Case Name | In re Arrival SA Securities Litigation |
| Court | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York |
| Defendant | Arrival SA, CIIG Merger Corp., related officers and directors |
| Settlement Amount | $13.3 million total ($11.275M cash + $2M defense cost reserve) |
| Final Approval Date | March 25, 2026 |
| Class Period | November 18, 2020 – November 19, 2021 |
| Who Was Eligible | Purchasers of Arrival SA / CIIG Merger Corp. securities during class period |
| Claim Filing Deadline | February 24, 2026 — now closed |
| Lead Plaintiffs | Mostaco Corp., Salvatore Fiorellino |
| Plaintiff Counsel | The Rosen Law Firm |
| Settlement Administrator | Strategic Claims Services, Media, PA |
| Attorney Fees | Up to 33.33% of settlement amount |
| Maximum Estimated Class Damages | ~$1.1 billion |
| Arrival Bankruptcy Filed | May 2024 |
What Arrival SA Told Investors — and What Actually Happened
Arrival once styled itself as a revolution in vehicle manufacturing. Its pitch to investors featured autonomous AI-powered microfactories, a promise of double-digit profit margins, and a vehicle production model it claimed would undercut traditional automakers on cost.
At the time the SPAC merger with CIIG Merger Corp. closed in March 2021, Arrival shares were trading at $22.80 — more than double their pre-merger price. Investors who bought in at or near that price would suffer devastating losses over the next twelve months.
The lawsuit alleged Arrival’s AI robots never worked as promised, production estimates were inflated, and even the vehicle materials had to be abandoned for being aesthetically poor. Within a year of the merger closing, Arrival began scaling back key production goals — the precise projections it had used to justify the SPAC deal in the first place. By May 2024, the company filed for bankruptcy.
How the SPAC Structure Made This Fraud Possible — and Harder to Sue Over
Arrival did not go public through a traditional IPO. It went public via a de-SPAC business combination with CIIG Merger Corp., completed on March 24, 2021. That structure matters legally because SPAC mergers involve a different disclosure process than standard IPOs — and determining exactly which statements were materially false, and when investors relied on them, is significantly more complex.
The class includes investors who purchased Arrival shares between November 2020 and November 2021 — a window that starts before the merger closed and ends when the company began publicly walking back its projections. Both individual retail investors and institutional entities holding Arrival or CIIG securities during that window were eligible to participate.
The settlement also resolved parallel claims pending in New York state court and Delaware Chancery Court. Attorneys in the Delaware case had raised objections, citing their exclusion from mediation and potential conflicts of interest — but the federal settlement was structured to achieve what plaintiffs’ counsel described as “global peace” regardless of those objections.
Related article: $2.75M Northwell Health Retirement Plan Settlement, Did They Shortchange Your 401(k)?

Why $13.3 Million on $1.1 Billion in Damages — and Whether That’s Fair
Investors’ attorneys estimated maximum class damages at approximately $1.1 billion, meaning the $13.3 million recovery represents just 0.10% to 0.12% of best-case losses. That is an exceptionally low recovery rate by any standard. But courts approved it — and the reasons tell you everything about the state of Arrival’s finances.
With Arrival declared bankrupt in May 2024, the $13.3 million settlement becomes critical. Attorneys argued the recovery was fair given Arrival’s collapse and dwindling insurance assets. When a defendant is bankrupt, the realistic alternative to a negotiated settlement is not a larger jury verdict — it is standing in line as an unsecured creditor in bankruptcy proceedings, where investors would likely recover far less, or nothing.
The $13.3 million total includes $11,275,000 in cash and a $2 million reserve set aside for certain defense costs. Any money remaining in that reserve after those costs are paid reverts to the settlement fund — potentially increasing the amount available to investors.
Attorney fees are capped at 33.33% of the settlement amount. After fees, expenses, and lead plaintiff service awards are deducted, the net fund distributed to investors will be smaller than the headline figure.
Key Dates in the Arrival SA Securities Class Action
| Milestone | Date |
| CIIG Merger Corp. / Arrival SPAC merger announced | November 18, 2020 |
| SPAC merger closes — Arrival goes public | March 24, 2021 |
| Arrival begins scaling back production projections | Late 2021 |
| Class period ends | November 19, 2021 |
| Arrival files for bankruptcy | May 2024 |
| Stipulation of Settlement signed | June 23, 2025 |
| Preliminary approval sought | July 1, 2025 |
| Long-form notice distributed to class members | November 2025 |
| Claim filing deadline | February 24, 2026 |
| Opt-out / objection deadline | February 24, 2026 |
| Final approval granted by court | March 25, 2026 |
| Payments to eligible claimants | After claim processing completes — TBD |
Frequently Asked Questions
I bought Arrival or CIIG shares during the class period. Can I still file a claim?
No. The claim filing deadline was February 24, 2026. The court has now granted final approval and the claims window is closed. If you submitted a valid claim before that deadline, you will receive your pro-rata share of the net settlement fund after Strategic Claims Services completes processing.
How much will each investor actually receive?
Individual payments depend on how many valid claims were submitted, each claimant’s recognised loss under the plan of allocation, and the net fund remaining after attorney fees, expenses, and lead plaintiff awards are deducted. Given the gap between $13.3 million and $1.1 billion in alleged damages, payments will represent a small fraction of individual losses. Strategic Claims Services will calculate and distribute individual amounts.
Why is $13.3 million considered a fair recovery when losses were $1.1 billion?
Arrival filed for bankruptcy in May 2024, leaving it with limited insurance assets and no meaningful ability to pay a larger judgment. Plaintiffs’ attorneys argued the settlement was the best realistic outcome given those constraints. A court judgment for a larger amount against a bankrupt company with no assets has limited practical value.
What was the CIIG Merger Corp. SPAC deal and why does it matter?
CIIG Merger Corp. was the special purpose acquisition company that merged with Arrival to take the EV company public in March 2021. SPAC mergers allow private companies to go public faster and with less regulatory scrutiny than a traditional IPO — which critics argue makes it easier for overpromised business plans to reach public investors before being rigorously tested.
Did Arrival admit wrongdoing as part of the settlement?
No. As with nearly all securities class action settlements, Arrival and the other defendants denied all allegations of wrongdoing. The settlement resolves the litigation without any finding of liability or admission of fraud.
Are the Arrival executives who signed off on the SPAC projections facing any personal consequences?
The settlement names Arrival SA and CIIG Merger Corp. officers and directors as settling defendants. Their personal liability is released as part of the settlement. No separate criminal charges related to these allegations have been publicly announced as of March 2026.
Sources & References
- Law360 Final Approval Report (March 25, 2026): law360.com/articles/2457615/ev-co-investors-get-final-ok-of-13-3m-deal-atty-fees
- Official Settlement Long Notice & Claim Form (Eastern District of New York): strategicclaims.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Final-Long-Notice-and-Claim-Form-Arrival.pdf
- Strategic Claims Services — Settlement Administrator: strategicclaims.net
- USA Herald original reporting (July 1, 2025): usaherald.com/arrival-investors-seek-green-light-for-13-3m-settlement-in-spac-fraud-lawsuit
Last Updated: March 28, 2026
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or investment advice. Securities claims and outcomes depend on specific facts and applicable law. The claim filing deadline for this settlement has passed. For questions about your specific claim, contact Strategic Claims Services directly.
About the Author

Sarah Klein, JD, is a licensed attorney and legal content strategist with over 12 years of experience across civil, criminal, family, and regulatory law. At All About Lawyer, she covers a wide range of legal topics — from high-profile lawsuits and courtroom stories to state traffic laws and everyday legal questions — all with a focus on accuracy, clarity, and public understanding.
Her writing blends real legal insight with plain-English explanations, helping readers stay informed and legally aware.
Read more about Sarah
