Hilton, LinkedIn, PNC Bank & Wells Fargo Pixel Tracking Class Action: What Website Visitors Need to Know

Four major companies — Hilton, LinkedIn, PNC Bank, and Wells Fargo — now face separate class action lawsuits in federal courts in California. Plaintiffs allege each company secretly embedded pixel trackers and hidden scripts on their websites, intercepting users’ browsing activity in real time and sending that data to outside companies for advertising without user knowledge or consent. No settlement exists yet. These cases are in early litigation.

Quick Facts

Field	Detail
Companies Named	Hilton Domestic Operating Co. Inc.; LinkedIn Corp.; PNC Bank, National Association; Wells Fargo & Co.
Lawsuit Type	Class Action (Litigation Phase — No Settlement Yet)
Laws Alleged Violated	California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA); Federal Wiretap Act
Settlement Amount	TBD — No settlement reached
Claim Deadline	TBD — No claims process open
Who May Qualify	People who visited these companies’ websites and had browsing data allegedly intercepted without consent
Payout Per Person	TBD
Proof Required	TBD
Settlement Status	Proposed / Early Litigation
Case Courts	U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California (Hilton, PNC, Wells Fargo); U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (LinkedIn)
Case Numbers	Hilton: 2:26-cv-01387-DC-CSK; PNC Bank: 2:26-at-00581; Wells Fargo: 2:26-cv-01353-DAD-CSK; LinkedIn: 4:26-cv-02953
Administrator	TBD
Official Website	TBD

Current Status & What Happens Next

• All four lawsuits were filed in April 2026 and remain in early litigation. No court has certified a class, approved a settlement, or issued rulings on the merits.
• No claims process is open yet. Consumers do not need to file anything at this stage.
• If settlements are reached in the future, AllAboutLawyer.com will update this page with claim deadlines, eligibility details, and filing instructions.

What Are the Hilton, LinkedIn, PNC Bank, and Wells Fargo Pixel Tracking Lawsuits About?

Plaintiffs allege that all four companies embedded invisible tracking tools — known as “pixels” — on their websites. These tools allegedly captured users’ browsing behavior the moment a page loaded, then transmitted that data to third parties in real time for advertising and user profiling purposes.

The complaints focus on a key legal point: the alleged interception happened as users browsed, not after the fact. Under the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) and the Federal Wiretap Act, real-time interception of electronic communications without consent can be unlawful, even when it happens silently through code embedded on a website.

Each company faces specific allegations based on who received the intercepted data and what that data revealed about users.

Related article: 70 Million Abbott Laboratories Similac Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit Verdict By Cook County Jury, What Parents Need to Know

What Did Each Company Allegedly Do?

Hilton

Plaintiff Gadeer Erakat claims Hilton embedded third-party tracking tools that allegedly intercepted users’ page URLs and search behavior during page loads. The complaint alleges these trackers enabled cross-session profiling for targeted advertising without user consent. Erakat further claims Hilton did not display a consent banner or notify users before activating the tracking technologies.

LinkedIn

Plaintiff Nicholas Farrell alleges LinkedIn used hidden browser-scanning scripts that detected which extensions users had installed, then transmitted that information to third parties. According to the complaint, this type of fingerprinting could expose sensitive personal information — including political views, religious affiliations, and employment status — all tied to users’ real identities. The lawsuit claims LinkedIn’s privacy policy did not disclose this practice.

PNC Bank

Plaintiff Shahd Erakat claims PNC Bank embedded trackers operated by Pinterest, LinkedIn, and X (formerly Twitter) on its personal finance pages. These tools allegedly captured full page URLs and persistent identifiers, allowing third parties to build advertising profiles based on users’ financial interests — such as their research into debt management or loan products. Erakat says no consent mechanism was in place.

Wells Fargo

Also filed by Shahd Erakat, the Wells Fargo lawsuit alleges the bank used tracking technologies operated by Google and Adobe to monitor website activity. The complaint claims these trackers transmitted browsing data — including visits to debt-related pages — alongside persistent identifiers that enabled tracking across multiple sessions, all without user authorization.

Who Is Eligible to Be Part of These Class Action Lawsuits?

No official class has been certified yet. However, based on the complaints filed, you may qualify if:

• You may qualify if you visited Hilton’s website and your browsing data — including page URLs or search behavior — was allegedly transmitted to third parties without your consent.
• You may qualify if you visited LinkedIn’s website and the platform allegedly scanned your browser for installed extensions and shared that information without your knowledge.
• You may qualify if you visited PNC Bank’s website, especially pages related to personal finance or loans, and your browsing activity was allegedly shared with Pinterest, LinkedIn, X, or other third-party platforms.
• You may qualify if you visited Wells Fargo’s website and your activity — including visits to debt-related pages — was allegedly tracked by Google, Adobe, or similar tools without your consent.
• You may qualify if you were located in California at the time of the alleged tracking, as CIPA applies to interceptions that occur in California — regardless of where you live.
• You may qualify if the alleged tracking occurred within the past three years, as California’s statute of limitations for CIPA claims is three years.

Note: You do not need to be a California resident to bring a CIPA claim. You only need to have been in California when the alleged interception occurred.

How Much Could You Receive?

No settlement amount has been proposed or approved in any of these four cases. The plaintiffs are seeking:

• Statutory damages under CIPA, which can reach up to $5,000 per violation
• Injunctive relief, meaning a court order requiring the companies to stop the alleged tracking practices
• Other damages as determined by the court

Because these cases are in early litigation, any payout — if a settlement is eventually reached — is TBD. AllAboutLawyer.com will update this article when settlement terms are announced.

What Is Pixel Tracking and Why Does It Matter?

A “pixel” is a tiny, invisible piece of code that companies place on their websites. When you load a page, the pixel fires automatically and sends information — such as which page you visited, what you searched for, and identifiers tied to your device or account — to a third-party company.

Pixels are extremely common in online advertising. The problem, according to these lawsuits, is that the companies allegedly did not tell users this was happening or ask for their permission. Under CIPA and the Federal Wiretap Act, secretly capturing and transmitting users’ electronic communications in real time may constitute illegal wiretapping — even when the “wiretap” is a piece of invisible software code.

Courts across California are increasingly allowing these types of cases to move forward. In January 2026, a federal judge in the Northern District of California denied a motion to dismiss in a similar CIPA pixel-tracking case, finding that allegations of real-time data interception were sufficient to state a legal claim at the pleading stage.

Important Deadlines & Dates

Milestone	Date
Lawsuits Filed	April 2026
Class Certification	TBD
Settlement Proposal	TBD
Claims Period Opens	TBD
Claim Filing Deadline	TBD
Opt-Out Deadline	TBD
Objection Deadline	TBD
Final Approval Hearing	TBD
Expected Payment Date	TBD

How to Stay Updated and Protect Your Rights

Because no settlement or claims process is open yet, there is no action for consumers to take right now. However, here are steps you can take today:

1. Bookmark this page — AllAboutLawyer.com will update this article when settlement terms, claim deadlines, or a claims portal become available.
2. Check your browser settings — You can limit third-party tracking by enabling “Do Not Track” in your browser or using a privacy-focused browser extension.
3. Review privacy policies — When you visit financial or hospitality websites, look for cookie consent banners and opt-out options before browsing sensitive pages.
4. Consult an attorney — If you believe your data was unlawfully intercepted, a privacy attorney can evaluate whether you have a personal claim.

Estimated time to complete future claim (once open): TBD

Frequently Asked Questions

Do I need a lawyer to file a claim in these pixel tracking lawsuits?

 Not necessarily. If a settlement is reached, a claims administrator will likely set up an online portal where you can file without legal help. However, if you want to pursue an individual privacy lawsuit under CIPA, consulting a privacy attorney is recommended. Most consumer privacy attorneys offer free consultations.

Are these pixel tracking lawsuits legitimate?

 Yes. All four cases are active class action lawsuits filed in federal courts in California, with assigned case numbers. The complaints name real companies, real plaintiffs, and cite specific federal and state privacy laws — including the California Invasion of Privacy Act and the Federal Wiretap Act.

When will I receive a payment from these lawsuits? 

No payment timeline exists yet. These cases are in early litigation. If the parties negotiate a settlement, it typically takes 12 to 24 months from filing before payments reach class members. AllAboutLawyer.com will post updates here as they become available.

What if I miss the claim deadline in the future? 

No claim deadline exists yet. Once a settlement is reached and a claims period opens, AllAboutLawyer.com will publish the deadline clearly. If you miss a future deadline, you may lose your right to a cash payment but you will not lose any right to pursue your own legal action.

Will a settlement payment from these lawsuits affect my taxes? 

Possibly. The IRS generally treats settlement payments as taxable income unless they compensate for a physical injury. Payments from privacy lawsuits like these may be considered taxable. Consult a tax professional if you receive a settlement payment.

I visited one of these websites. Does that mean my data was definitely shared? 

Not necessarily. The lawsuits allege that the tracking occurred broadly during page loads, but courts have not ruled on the merits yet. If you visited these websites during the relevant period, you may fall within the class definition if a class is certified.

What laws do these lawsuits rely on? 

The lawsuits invoke the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) — specifically its wiretapping and pen register provisions — and the Federal Wiretap Act. CIPA allows for statutory damages of up to $5,000 per violation and applies to real-time interception of electronic communications without consent.

What is a pixel tracker and is it illegal?

 A pixel tracker is a tiny piece of invisible code placed on a webpage that automatically sends user data to a third party when the page loads. Pixel trackers themselves are not automatically illegal — but using them to intercept users’ communications in real time without consent may violate CIPA and the Federal Wiretap Act, which is the core allegation in these lawsuits.

Sources & References

• Erakat v. Hilton Domestic Operating Co. Inc., Case 2:26-cv-01387-DC-CSK, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
• Erakat v. Wells Fargo & Co., Case 2:26-cv-01353-DAD-CSK, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
• Erakat v. PNC Bank, National Association, Case 2:26-at-00581, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
• Farrell v. LinkedIn Corp., Case 4:26-cv-02953, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Last Updated: April 15, 2026

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Legal claims and outcomes depend on specific facts and applicable law. For advice regarding a particular situation, consult a qualified attorney.