$300K Seafood City Supermarket BIPA Settlement, Are You Eligible for a Cash Payout? Claim Before June 1
SFC Foods Chicago Inc., doing business as Seafood City Supermarket, has agreed to a $300,000 class action settlement to resolve claims it violated the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA). The lawsuit alleged the grocer required Illinois employees to scan their hands or fingerprints for timekeeping without providing proper legal disclosures or obtaining written consent. If you worked at an Illinois Seafood City and used a hand-scanning time clock between 2019 and 2024, you may be eligible for a cash payment estimated at $417. The deadline to take action is June 1, 2026.
Quick Facts
| Field | Detail |
| Settlement Amount | $300,000 |
| Claim Deadline | June 1, 2026 |
| Who Qualifies | Illinois Seafood City employees (Jan 2019 – May 2024) |
| Payout Per Person | $417 (Estimated) |
| Proof Required | No |
| Settlement Status | Preliminarily Approved |
| Administrator | Simpluris |
| Official Website | SFCBIPASettlement.com |
Current Status & What Happens Next
- Preliminary Approval: The court granted preliminary approval for the $300,000 settlement on March 12, 2026.
- Opt-Out/Objection Deadline: Class members who wish to exclude themselves or object to the deal must submit their request by June 1, 2026.
- Final Approval Hearing: The court will hold a final hearing on June 17, 2026, to officially approve the settlement and authorize payments.
What Is the Seafood City Lawsuit About?
The lawsuit, Franz Vergara v. SFC Foods Chicago Inc. d/b/a Seafood City Supermarkets, was filed in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois. The plaintiff alleged that the supermarket chain implemented a biometric timekeeping system that required employees to scan their handprints, fingerprints, or hand geometry to clock in and out of shifts.
Under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA), private companies must follow strict steps before collecting such data. This includes informing individuals in writing that their biometrics are being stored, stating the specific purpose of the collection, and obtaining a signed written release. The lawsuit claimed Seafood City failed to meet these requirements, potentially exposing employees to identity theft risks if the data were ever breached.
Seafood City denies any wrongdoing and maintains that it complied with all applicable laws. The company has chosen to settle the case to avoid the mounting legal fees and the uncertainty of a jury trial in Illinois’ strict privacy litigation environment.
Who Is Eligible to File a Claim?
You may qualify for a payment from this settlement if you meet the following criteria:
- You were employed by Seafood City at an Illinois location.
- Your employment occurred at any time between January 22, 2019, and May 22, 2024.
- You were required to scan your hand, palm, handprint, or other biometric identifier to record your hours worked.
Related article: $2M Aurobindo Irbesartan Drug Contamination Settlement, Do You Qualify for a Cash Payment? Claim Before June 2

How Much Can You Receive?
The settlement established a $300,000 gross fund. After deducting court-approved attorney fees, administrative costs, and service awards, the “Net Settlement Fund” will be divided equally among all eligible class members.
- Estimated Payout: Based on the current number of identified class members, each person is expected to receive approximately $417.
- Payment Type: Payments will be issued via check or electronic payment (depending on the method selected during the claim process).
- Final Amount: The actual amount may fluctuate slightly depending on the final administrative costs approved by the court.
How to File a Claim
The settlement is being handled by Simpluris. Eligible class members should have received a notice via mail with a unique ID.
- Visit the official settlement portal at SFCBIPASettlement.com.
- Click on the “Submit Claim” or “Update Information” section.
- Enter the Class Member ID provided in your mailed notice (if you didn’t receive one, contact the administrator).
- Confirm your current mailing address and contact details.
- Select your preferred payment method (Check or digital).
- Submit the form before the June 1, 2026, deadline.
Estimated time to complete: 4 minutes.
Important Deadlines & Dates
| Milestone | Date |
| Preliminary Approval | March 12, 2026 |
| Claim Filing Deadline | June 1, 2026 |
| Opt-Out Deadline | June 1, 2026 |
| Objection Deadline | June 1, 2026 |
| Final Approval Hearing | June 17, 2026 |
| Expected Payment Date | August 2026 (approx. 60 days after approval) |
Frequently Asked Questions
Do I need a lawyer to file a claim?
No. You do not need to hire your own attorney. The court has appointed legal counsel to represent the entire class. The fees for these lawyers will be paid out of the settlement fund and must be approved by the judge.
Is this settlement legitimate?
Yes. This is a court-authorized settlement for Case No. 2024CH00432 in Cook County, Illinois. You can verify the details by contacting the settlement administrator, Simpluris, at 833-386-6485.
When will I receive my payment?
If the court grants final approval on June 17, 2026, and no appeals are filed, the administrator typically begins issuing payments approximately 60 days later. Most class members should receive their funds by late August 2026.
What if I missed the claim deadline?
If you miss the June 1, 2026, deadline, you will not receive a payment and you will give up your right to sue Seafood City for these specific BIPA violations in the future.
Will this settlement payment affect my taxes?
Settlement payments are generally considered taxable income by the IRS. You will likely receive a 1099 form if your payout exceeds a certain threshold. You should consult a tax professional for specific advice.
What if I no longer work at Seafood City?
You are still eligible as long as you worked at an Illinois location and used the biometric scanner at any point between January 2019 and May 2024. Your current employment status does not affect your eligibility.
Is my biometric data still being stored?
As part of the settlement, Seafood City has agreed to ensure its timekeeping practices comply with BIPA standards moving forward, which includes implementing proper destruction protocols for biometric data that is no longer needed.
Sources & References
- Official Settlement Website: SFCBIPASettlement.com
- Court Record: Vergara v. SFC Foods Chicago Inc., Case No. 2024CH00432
“Missing Pillars” of Legal Reporting
- Discovery Insights: Court filings indicate that the plaintiff’s counsel focused on the lack of a publicly available retention schedule, a key requirement of BIPA that many Illinois employers overlook when installing “plug-and-play” biometric systems.
- Bellwether Context: This $300,000 deal is consistent with recent BIPA settlements for mid-sized employers in Illinois, reflecting a shift toward faster resolutions following the Illinois Supreme Court’s Cothron v. White Castle ruling, which clarified how damages accrue.
- Objector Status: No objections have been formally lodged as of April 6, 2026. The settlement is considered highly favorable given the estimated $417 per-person payout, which is higher than many recent biometric class actions.
- Tax Implications: Class members are advised that these payments are classified as non-wage liquidated damages. While not subject to payroll tax withholding, they are generally reportable as “Other Income” on federal tax returns.
- Attorney Fee Breakdown: Class counsel has requested $112,500 in fees (37.5% of the fund) and $3,500 in expenses. These amounts must be justified to and approved by the court at the final hearing in June.
Last Updated: April 6, 2026
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Legal claims and outcomes depend on specific facts and applicable law. For advice regarding a particular situation, consult a qualified attorney.
About the Author
Sarah Klein, JD, is a licensed attorney and legal content strategist with over 12 years of experience across civil, criminal, family, and regulatory law. At All About Lawyer, she covers a wide range of legal topics — from high-profile lawsuits and courtroom stories to state traffic laws and everyday legal questions — all with a focus on accuracy, clarity, and public understanding.
Her writing blends real legal insight with plain-English explanations, helping readers stay informed and legally aware.
Read more about Sarah
