Juana Delgado Soto vs. Kylie Jenner, The 2nd Housekeeper Lawsuit and What the Filing Actually Says

Juana Delgado Soto vs. Kylie Jenner is a racial discrimination, harassment, and wage theft lawsuit filed April 29, 2026, in which former housekeeper Juana Delgado Soto alleges she endured six years of escalating mistreatment at Jenner’s home — including being mocked for her accent, denied pay for holidays and sick days, and threatened with termination after she slipped Jenner a letter pleading for help. The complaint was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court. Jenner has not yet publicly responded, and no court hearing has been scheduled as of May 1, 2026.

Quick Facts — Soto vs. Kylie Jenner Lawsuit

Field	Detail
Plaintiff	Juana Delgado Soto
Defendants	Kylie Jenner; Kylie Jenner Inc.; Itzel Sibrian; Tri Star Services; La Maison Family Services
Court	Los Angeles County Superior Court
Case Number	TBD — not yet confirmed in the public docket as of May 1, 2026
Date Filed	April 29, 2026
Legal Claims	Racial discrimination; national origin discrimination; harassment; wrongful termination; retaliation; failure to pay wages; failure to prevent or remedy harassment; intentional infliction of emotional distress (20 causes of action total, according to reporting)
Damages Sought	Punitive and compensatory damages — exact amount unspecified in the complaint as reported
Current Stage	Recently filed — no hearing date confirmed
Next Scheduled Date	TBD — no court date set as of May 1, 2026
Plaintiff’s Attorney	Della Shaker
Last Updated	May 1, 2026

Case Timeline

Date	Event
May 2019	Soto began working as a housekeeper for Kylie Jenner, according to the complaint
Late 2023	Itzel Sibrian allegedly became Soto’s direct supervisor; harassment allegedly escalated
July 4, 2023	Soto allegedly worked a holiday and was not paid holiday pay, per the complaint
2024	Soto filed an internal complaint against Sibrian; Sibrian was temporarily removed then reinstated
After reinstatement	Sibrian allegedly reduced Soto’s hourly wage, increased her workload, and changed her schedule
April 2025	Soto placed a letter on Jenner’s massage bed asking for help; was allegedly threatened with termination the next day
August 2025	Soto texted her resignation after alleged conditions became unbearable
April 29, 2026	Lawsuit filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court
Next hearing date	TBD — not yet set as of May 1, 2026

What Is the Soto vs. Kylie Jenner Lawsuit About? Soto v. Jenner et al., Los Angeles County Superior Court (April 29, 2026)

Juana Delgado Soto filed this complaint in Los Angeles Superior Court, naming Jenner, staff supervisor Itzel Sibrian, Tri Star Services, and La Maison Family Services as defendants. The lawsuit alleges violations of California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), which prohibits harassment and discrimination based on race and national origin, along with California Labor Code provisions requiring proper wages, overtime pay, and meal and rest breaks.

According to the complaint, Soto began working for Jenner in 2019 and alleged that throughout her employment, defendants withheld legally required meal and rest breaks. She said things got significantly worse in 2023 when Sibrian became her direct supervisor. Soto alleged Sibrian frequently mocked her ethnicity, including laughing at her English, calling her stupid, and asking why she couldn’t speak properly.

The lawsuit also alleges wage violations, including a July 2023 incident where Soto did not receive holiday pay for working on the Fourth of July, and that she was similarly denied sick pay. The complaint includes 20 causes of action in total, according to reporting by TMZ and the Los Angeles Times. Kylie Jenner is not directly accused of personally harassing Soto — the legal theory rests on the employer’s alleged failure to stop harassment it knew or should have known about, and on the alleged retaliation Soto faced after she tried to report it.

You can read more about how employer liability works in these cases in our article on the Angelica Vasquez vs. Kylie Jenner discrimination lawsuit, which involves near-identical allegations filed just one week earlier.

Who Are Juana Delgado Soto and Kylie Jenner?

Juana Delgado Soto is a former housekeeper who, according to the complaint, worked at Kylie Jenner’s residence for approximately six years, beginning in May 2019. The lawsuit describes her as Hispanic and says she experienced escalating mistreatment tied to her race, national origin, and immigration status throughout her employment. Attorney Della Shaker represents Soto — the same attorney who filed the separate lawsuit on behalf of Angelica Vasquez against Jenner just one week earlier.

Related article: 13 State Attorneys General vs Nexstar and Tegna Acquisition, The $6.2 Billion TV Merger Antitrust Lawsuit With Recent Updates

Kylie Jenner is a 28-year-old beauty entrepreneur and media personality, known for founding Kylie Cosmetics and appearing in Keeping Up with the Kardashians and its spinoff The Kardashians. She is named as a defendant in her capacity as the employer at her Los Angeles residence. A representative for Jenner declined to comment on April 30, 2026, noting that Jenner had not yet seen the lawsuit. Jenner is not directly accused of personally engaging in any discriminatory or harassing behavior — the complaint focuses on supervisors and the alleged failure of management to act.

For context on employment discrimination claims against private household employers, see our guide to workplace harassment and hostile work environment lawsuits.

What Does the Complaint Allege?

The most striking detail in this filing is what happened when Soto tried to go directly to Jenner. According to the lawsuit, in April 2025, Soto wrote a lengthy letter to Jenner and placed it on her massage bed right before Jenner was scheduled to get a massage. In the letter, Soto reportedly wrote that she needed to express how terribly she was being mentally abused, while also apologizing for raising the situation and expressing her belief that Jenner would not allow this if she knew about it.

Instead of getting help, the lawsuit alleged that the response was the opposite of what Soto hoped for — she was allegedly threatened with termination and instructed never to contact Jenner again. According to the filing, defendants told her she was no longer allowed to look at Kylie, smile at Kylie, and that if she saw Kylie, she would have to disappear.

The lawsuit also alleged that Soto was given restricted bathroom access, was forced to clean Jenner’s doghouse, and was prohibited from drinking water inside the home. By August 2025, the complaint says she had no choice but to resign. In her resignation text, Soto wrote that she could no longer continue because she was being mistreated every day, could not sleep at night, always had anxiety, and that no one had helped her despite everything she tried.

What Happens Next in This Case?

The complaint was filed Wednesday, April 29, 2026, in L.A. County Superior Court. No hearing date has been set and no case number has been confirmed in the public docket as of May 1, 2026. At this stage in a California employment lawsuit, the typical process is: Jenner’s team files a formal response to the complaint, both sides may attempt private mediation, and if no resolution is reached, the case moves into the discovery phase — where both sides exchange evidence.

Soto’s attorney Della Shaker said that this is not an isolated incident and that employees need to understand they have rights and don’t need to suffer at the hands of their employers. Shaker also represents Angelica Vasquez, who filed a nearly identical lawsuit against Jenner the week before. The fact that two former housekeepers filed separate suits within days of each other — with overlapping defendants including Tri Star Services and La Maison Family Services — will likely draw attention to the staffing companies named alongside Jenner.

This page will be updated when a case number is confirmed, when Jenner files a legal response, or when a court date is set.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who filed the lawsuit against Kylie Jenner and why?

 Juana Delgado Soto, a former housekeeper who worked for Jenner from 2019 to 2025, filed the lawsuit on April 29, 2026 in Los Angeles County Superior Court. According to the complaint, she alleges six years of racial harassment, wage theft, and retaliation — including being threatened after she tried to alert Jenner directly about her mistreatment.

Is Kylie Jenner personally accused of harassing Soto? 

No. According to the complaint as reported, Jenner is not directly accused of any discriminatory or harassing conduct. The lawsuit focuses on supervisor Itzel Sibrian and the management companies. Jenner is named because California law can hold employers liable when they knew or should have known about harassment and failed to stop it.

What court is handling this case?

 The lawsuit was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court on April 29, 2026. The case number has not been confirmed in the public docket as of May 1, 2026. You can search by party name at lacourt.org.

What is the current status of the Soto vs. Jenner lawsuit? 

The case is in its earliest stage — just filed on April 29, 2026. No hearing has been scheduled, and Jenner’s legal team has not yet filed a formal response. No settlement has been discussed publicly.

How much is Soto seeking in damages? 

The complaint seeks punitive and compensatory damages, including unpaid wages, emotional distress damages, and other relief. No specific dollar figure has been confirmed in verified sources as of May 1, 2026.

Can I read the court documents?

The complaint was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court and should be accessible through the California Courts public portal at lacourt.org by searching the plaintiff’s or defendant’s name in the civil filing index once the case number is publicly indexed.

Is this connected to the other Kylie Jenner housekeeper lawsuit? 

Yes. Just one week before Soto filed, a separate housekeeper named Angelica Vasquez filed her own lawsuit against Jenner with similar allegations of harassment and discrimination. Both suits name the same staffing companies and are handled by the same attorney, Della Shaker. The two cases are legally separate but involve overlapping defendants and similar alleged conduct.

What is intentional infliction of emotional distress?

 It is a civil claim under California law that requires proving a defendant’s conduct was extreme and outrageous, intentional or reckless, and directly caused severe emotional suffering. Soto includes this claim alongside the workplace harassment and discrimination causes of action in her complaint.

Sources & References

• Los Angeles Times — Reporting on the Soto v. Jenner complaint, April 30, 2026
• USA TODAY — Court documents obtained April 29, 2026 — usatoday.com
• The Independent — Court documents obtained May 1, 2026 — independent.co.uk
• Related case: Angelica Vasquez vs. Kylie Jenner Discrimination Lawsuit — AllAboutLawyer.com

Prepared by the AllAboutLawyer.com Editorial Team and reviewed for factual accuracy against verified public reporting on May 1, 2026. Last Updated: May 1, 2026

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Information about this case is based on publicly available court records and verified reporting. All allegations described in this article have not been proven in court. For advice regarding a particular legal situation, consult a qualified attorney.