Blizzard Sues Project Ascension Over Copyright and Racketeering Claims Tied to Private WoW Server
Blizzard Entertainment has taken its long-running fight against unauthorized World of Warcraft servers to one of the biggest targets yet. On June 12, 2026, the company filed a 51-page federal complaint against the operators of Project Ascension, a private server that’s reportedly drawn over a million players by scrapping WoW’s traditional class system in favor of freely combined abilities.
Blizzard v. Project Ascension — Key Facts
| Field | Detail |
| Case Name | Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. v. Powell, et al. |
| Case Number | 8:26-cv-01506 |
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| Filed | June 12, 2026 |
| Judge | John W. Holcomb (Magistrate: Douglas F. McCormick) |
| Claims | Copyright infringement, DMCA circumvention, trademark/false designation of origin, tortious interference with contract, and two civil RICO counts |
| Named Defendants | Derek S. Powell, Bryan Thomas Mannion, Lincoln Marshall Simpson, Brien Allen Middaugh, Andrew James Seward, Alexander Steven Kozma, Ye Lwin, Exalted Management Services, Exalted Management and Consultation Services LLC, Online Management Partners, and Does 1-10 |
| Relief Sought | Permanent injunction shutting down the server, delivery of the game client and related materials, an accounting of revenue, statutory damages, and attorneys’ fees |
| Current Status | Several defendants have waived formal service; response deadline set for September 8, 2026. No ruling on the merits and no injunction has been issued. |
| Last Updated | August 29, 2026 |
What Blizzard Is Alleging
Blizzard’s complaint describes Project Ascension as far more than a hobbyist fan project. It accuses the operators of distributing millions of pirated copies of WoW’s client software, running an altered login and realm infrastructure separate from Blizzard’s own servers, and generating substantial revenue through in-game purchases like “Donation Points” and a shop tied to seasonal content updates.
Two of the nine counts invoke the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act — the same law originally written to prosecute organized crime. Blizzard alleges the people behind Project Ascension ran a “sophisticated and lucrative global enterprise” for at least five years, and that some of the named companies exist only as shell entities to move money and avoid scrutiny from U.S. authorities.
The complaint also draws attention to where the servers are hosted. Blizzard says Project Ascension relies on infrastructure from Aeza Group, a Russian “bulletproof” hosting provider that the U.S. Treasury Department sanctioned in 2025 for supporting cybercriminal activity. Blizzard’s lawyers argue that choice alone signals the defendants knew they were operating outside the law.

Who’s Named in the Suit
The complaint names two individuals — Derek Powell of Nashville, Tennessee, and Bryan Thomas Mannion of Akron, Ohio — as the project’s primary operators, along with several additional developers and community staff located across Texas, California, Arizona, and Sydney, Australia. Two U.S. companies, Exalted Management Services and Online Management Partners, are described in the complaint as shell corporations used to funnel money from the operation.
As of mid-July 2026, several defendants — including Powell, Mannion, and the two named companies — had waived formal service of the lawsuit, pushing their deadline to respond to September 8, 2026. Attorney Frederic M. Douglas has entered an appearance for multiple defendants, meaning the case has moved from a one-sided complaint toward an actual contested dispute.
This Isn’t Blizzard’s First Fight Like This
Project Ascension is the latest in a string of Blizzard lawsuits against private WoW servers, and the most recent one offers a preview of what could come next. Blizzard sued Turtle WoW in August 2025 using a nearly identical mix of copyright, DMCA, trademark, and RICO claims. That case ended in a confidential settlement, and the court entered a permanent injunction against Turtle WoW’s operator in April 2026. The server shut down for good on May 15, 2026.
An older case looms even larger over the current dispute. In 2010, a federal judge entered a default judgment of $88,594,539 against the operator of a different unauthorized WoW server, Scapegaming — a figure built from disgorged profits plus statutory damages after the defendant failed to respond in court.
What Happens Next
Nothing about Project Ascension’s current status has been legally settled. As of mid-August 2026, the server remains online, with seven active realms and an ongoing seasonal content campaign, and Blizzard has not yet secured any court order forcing it to shut down. A complaint contains allegations, not proven facts — and unlike Turtle WoW’s operator, several Project Ascension defendants have now appeared through counsel rather than staying silent, which suggests this case may actually be litigated on its merits rather than resolved by default.
Sources Used in This Article
- U.S. District Court for the Central District of California — Case No. 8:26-cv-01506, Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. v. Powell, et al. (docket via CourtListener/PacerMonitor)
- Aftermath — “Blizzard Sues To Take Down Another Private World of Warcraft Server, Project Ascension,” June 2026: https://aftermath.site/blizzard-project-ascension-lawsuit/
- Complex — “Blizzard Sues Project Ascension Over Copyright Infringement On ‘World of Warcraft,'” June 13, 2026: https://www.complex.com/pop-culture/a/treyalston/blizzard-project-ascension-lawsuit-wow-private-server
- Massively Overpowered — “Blizzard moves ahead with its Project Ascension rogue server lawsuit by sending motion summons requests,” June 29, 2026: https://massivelyop.com/2026/06/29/blizzard-moves-ahead-with-its-project-ascension-rogue-server-lawsuit-by-sending-motion-summons-requests/
Researched and written by Israr Ahmad, legal content researcher and founder of AllAboutLawyer.com. All facts verified against publicly available court filings and contemporaneous news coverage, as of August 29, 2026.
Last Updated: August 29, 2026
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The allegations described here have not been proven in court. For advice about your specific situation, consult a qualified attorney.
About the Author
Israr Ahmad is a legal content researcher with 4+ years of experience covering class action settlements and consumer rights cases. He has researched and published coverage of 2,500+ settlements using verified court records, settlement administrator filings, and government sources. Learn more about Israr.
