Ask a Lawyer

New Jersey’s e-bike safety legislation—Bill S4834/A6235, passed by the Legislature on January 13, 2026 and awaiting Governor Murphy’s signature or veto—would require driver’s licenses, Motor Vehicle Commission registration, and liability insurance for all electric bicycles, including low-speed models under 20 mph. The bill awaits final approval before becoming law, giving e-bike owners time to prepare…

The FACE Act (Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act), codified at 18 U.S.C. § 248, is a federal law enacted in 1994 that prohibits violence, threats, intimidation, and property damage targeting individuals seeking or providing reproductive health services, as well as individuals at places of religious worship—the law is enforced by the Department of…

President Trump announced 10% tariffs on eight European countries starting February 1, 2026, escalating to 25% by June unless they support U.S. acquisition of Greenland. In a letter to Norway’s Prime Minister, Trump linked his aggressive stance to not winning the Nobel Peace Prize, stating he no longer feels obliged to “think purely of Peace.”…

Apple’s $95 million Siri privacy lawsuit settlement was approved August 1, 2025, ending the six-year legal battle over allegations that Siri recorded private conversations without consent. The claim deadline passed July 2, 2025, meaning no new claims can be filed. Eligible claimants who submitted forms before the deadline should receive up to $20 per device—though…

As of 2026, only six U.S. states still recognize “homewrecker laws”—North Carolina, Mississippi, South Dakota, New Mexico, Utah, and Hawaii—which allow spouses to sue third parties for alienation of affection or criminal conversation when someone interferes with their marriage. These controversial civil lawsuits can result in substantial financial damages, with some North Carolina cases awarding…

Minnesota Statute 609.065 governs when individuals can lawfully use deadly force to defend themselves or others. The law permits the intentional taking of another person’s life only when necessary to resist or prevent an offense that exposes the person or another to great bodily harm or death, or when preventing the commission of a felony…

Minnesota Statute 609.06 defines when individuals can legally use force to defend themselves or others from harm. The law establishes legal standards for reasonable force, specifies when force is justified to resist offenses against person or property, and requires individuals to retreat when reasonably possible before using force in public spaces. Understanding this statute is…

No, the Insurrection Act is not the same as martial law—they are fundamentally different legal frameworks with distinct authorities and constitutional implications. The Insurrection Act (10 U.S.C. §§ 251-255) authorizes the president to deploy federal military forces to assist civilian authorities during insurrection or civil disorder, while martial law involves military governance replacing civilian authority…

No, the Insurrection Act is not martial law, though both involve military authority during domestic emergencies. The Insurrection Act (10 U.S.C. §§ 251-255) authorizes the president to deploy federal troops to assist civilian authorities, while martial law involves military governance replacing civilian control—two fundamentally different legal frameworks with distinct constitutional implications. What the Insurrection Act…