WWE Class Action Lawsuit, Fans Slam $29.99 ESPN Fee After Being Told Access Was “Free” – Here’s What You Need to Know
LATEST UPDATE: Class Action Filed January 8, 2026
Breaking: A class action lawsuit was filed against WWE on January 8, 2026, in U.S. District Court in Connecticut accusing the company of deceptive marketing practices related to its ESPN Premium Live Events streaming deal. The lawsuit claims WWE and ESPN misled existing ESPN subscribers into believing they’d automatically get access to WWE events, then charged them $29.99/month anyway. The case is just beginning—WWE has not yet responded, and no settlement exists.
The Bottom Line: Michael Diesa of New Jersey and Rebecca Toback of New York filed a class action lawsuit against WWE (only WWE, not ESPN) claiming the company engaged in deceptive marketing practices regarding the September 2025 move of Premium Live Events to ESPN’s streaming service. The lawsuit alleges that press releases and statements from WWE executives led existing ESPN subscribers to believe they’d automatically have access to WWE events like WrestleMania and Royal Rumble with their current subscriptions—but instead, they were forced to pay an additional $29.99/month for ESPN’s direct-to-consumer service. The lawsuit seeks over $5 million in damages and represents ESPN customers who subscribed to ESPN DTE between August 6, 2025 and September 20, 2025 while already having ESPN through cable or satellite providers. WWE has not yet responded to the allegations.
Imagine this: you’ve been an ESPN subscriber for years through your cable company. You’re excited when WWE announces in August 2025 that Premium Live Events are moving to ESPN. The press release says features will be “available to all fans who watch on the ESPN App…whether they subscribe directly or through a traditional pay TV package.”
You think: “Great! I already have ESPN. I’m all set.”
Then September 20, 2025 rolls around—Wrestlepalooza, the first WWE event on ESPN. You fire up the ESPN app to watch John Cena, CM Punk, and Cody Rhodes. And you hit a paywall.
$29.99 per month. Your existing ESPN subscription? Doesn’t count.
For thousands of wrestling fans, that’s exactly what happened. And now, two of them are suing WWE for what they call a bait-and-switch that cost fans millions of dollars.
The $1.6 Billion ESPN Deal That Led to This Lawsuit
In August 2025, WWE announced a massive five-year, $1.6 billion streaming partnership with ESPN. Starting with a special event called Wrestlepalooza in September 2025, all WWE Premium Live Events—WrestleMania, Royal Rumble, SummerSlam, Survivor Series—would stream exclusively on ESPN’s platform.
This was huge. WWE had just moved to Netflix for Raw in January 2025. Now PLEs were leaving Peacock (where they cost $10.99/month) and heading to ESPN.
But here’s where fans say WWE got deceptive.
An August 6, 2025 press release announced the deal. The key language? Features would “be available to all fans who watch on the ESPN App on mobile and connected TV devices, whether they subscribe directly or through a traditional pay TV package.”
Fans who already paid for ESPN through Comcast, DirecTV, or other cable/satellite providers read that and assumed they were covered. Why wouldn’t they be? The press release said “all fans” who have ESPN access.
What WWE President Nick Khan Said (And Why Fans Feel Betrayed)
The lawsuit specifically calls out WWE President Nick Khan’s comments on the Varsity podcast in August 2025.
Khan was explaining how WWE events evolved from pay-per-view ($50+ per show) to WWE Network ($9.99/month), then to Peacock, and now to ESPN.
His pitch to fans? When WWE moved away from traditional pay-per-view, subscribers could watch the company’s biggest shows for just $9.99—with no additional upcharges.
The implication was clear: if you’re an ESPN subscriber, you’re good. No extra fees.
Except that wasn’t true.
The $29.99 Surprise That Shocked Wrestling Fans
When Wrestlepalooza went live on September 20, 2025, existing ESPN subscribers discovered they needed to pay $29.99/month for ESPN’s direct-to-consumer service (ESPN DTE) to watch WWE events.
Their existing ESPN subscriptions—even if they were paying $100+ per month for cable packages that included ESPN—didn’t grant access.
That’s nearly triple what they paid on Peacock. And it’s exactly what fans say WWE and ESPN never warned them about.
Michael Diesa and Rebecca Toback, the two fans who filed the lawsuit, both experienced this. They’re ESPN subscribers through traditional TV providers. They saw the marketing materials. They assumed they’d have access. They got hit with the $29.99 charge instead.
Related Article: MySchoolBucks Lawsuit, Court Just Approved $18.25M Settlement – Here’s What Shocked Parents Need to Know
Why ESPN Isn’t Being Sued (But WWE Is)
Here’s an interesting legal move: the lawsuit only names WWE as a defendant. ESPN and its parent company Disney are not sued, even though ESPN was heavily involved in the marketing.
Why? Smart lawyering.
ESPN’s subscriber agreement includes two legal landmines:
- An arbitration clause (forcing disputes into private arbitration instead of court)
- A class action waiver (preventing customers from joining together in lawsuits)
By suing only WWE, the plaintiffs avoid those restrictions. The lawsuit acknowledges this in a footnote, noting those provisions “only apply…to disputes between subscribers and Disney, ESPN, and/or Hulu.”
It’s a strategic choice that keeps the case in court and allows it to proceed as a class action.
What the Lawsuit Alleges WWE Did Wrong
The complaint accuses WWE of several legal violations:
Deceptive Marketing Practices: Knowingly misleading consumers through press releases and executive statements that suggested existing ESPN subscribers wouldn’t need to pay extra
Consumer Fraud: Willfully misrepresenting the terms of access to WWE events on ESPN’s platform
Breach of Good Faith: Conspiring with ESPN to create misleading marketing materials while knowing the truth would cost fans significantly more
The lawsuit claims this wasn’t a miscommunication—it was intentional. WWE and ESPN, working together, crafted messaging designed to make existing ESPN subscribers believe they’d automatically have access, when in reality they’d face a $29.99/month paywall.
Who’s Covered by the Class Action?
The proposed class includes:
✓ ESPN customers who subscribed to ESPN DTE between August 6, 2025 and September 20, 2025
✓ Who already had ESPN access through cable or satellite TV providers
✓ Who subscribed specifically to watch WWE Premium Live Events
If you fit those criteria, you could be part of this class action—assuming it gets certified by the court.
Not covered:
- Fans who didn’t already have ESPN through a TV provider
- People who subscribed after September 20, 2025
- Fans who never subscribed to ESPN DTE and simply stopped watching WWE
How Much Money Is at Stake?
The lawsuit claims there’s more than $5 million wrapped up in this issue.
That calculation likely comes from:
- Thousands of existing ESPN subscribers who paid $29.99/month thinking they already had access
- Subscribers who paid for multiple months (September 2025 onwards)
- The difference between what fans expected to pay ($0 extra) and what they actually paid ($29.99/month)
If the plaintiffs win, eligible class members could receive:
- Full or partial refunds of their ESPN DTE subscription fees
- Compensation for being misled
- Potential punitive damages if the court finds WWE’s conduct particularly egregious
What WWE and ESPN Haven’t Said (Yet)
As of January 10, 2026, neither WWE nor ESPN has officially responded to the lawsuit.
That’s normal—companies typically have weeks to file their legal responses. But here’s what we can expect:
Possible WWE Defenses:
- The press releases and marketing materials weren’t deceptive when read carefully
- Fans should have known ESPN DTE was a separate subscription service
- There’s no actual contract between WWE and individual fans, so no breach occurred
- The arbitration clauses in ESPN’s agreements might still apply somehow
WWE might also argue that ESPN—not WWE—controlled the messaging and subscription requirements, so any deception wasn’t WWE’s fault.
The Bigger Picture: Is This Pattern or Mistake?
This isn’t WWE’s first rodeo with class action lawsuits in recent years.
October 2024: Former “Ring Boys” filed a lawsuit against WWE, Vince McMahon, Linda McMahon, and TKO alleging systemic sexual abuse and cover-ups
January 2024: WWE shareholders sued Vince McMahon, Nick Khan, and Triple H alleging the TKO merger was designed to cover up McMahon’s alleged sexual misconduct
Ongoing: The Janel Grant lawsuit accusing Vince McMahon of sexual misconduct and trafficking
Consumer advocates point out a troubling pattern: WWE makes big promises (access to events, transparency, accountability), then fans and insiders discover the reality doesn’t match the marketing.
What Should Affected Fans Do Right Now?
If you’re an ESPN subscriber who paid for ESPN DTE to watch WWE events despite already having ESPN through cable/satellite:
Step 1: Gather Documentation
- Proof of your cable/satellite ESPN subscription (bills showing you had ESPN before September 2025)
- Receipts or bank statements showing ESPN DTE charges
- Any emails or communications from WWE or ESPN about the streaming deal
Step 2: Keep Records
- Don’t cancel anything yet—keep records of ongoing charges
- Screenshot relevant marketing materials if you still have access to them
- Save any emails about the ESPN deal
Step 3: Watch for Updates
- The lawsuit is brand new—class certification hasn’t happened yet
- There’s no settlement, no claim forms, and no deadlines (yet)
- Follow sports and legal news outlets for updates
Step 4: Consider Your Options
- You’re automatically part of the class if you fit the criteria (once it’s certified)
- You can opt out later if you want to sue WWE individually
- You can object to any settlement if you think it’s unfair
How Long Will This Take?
Class action lawsuits move slowly. Here’s a realistic timeline:
2026: WWE files its response and likely moves to dismiss the case. Plaintiffs fight to keep it alive and seek class certification.
2027: If the case survives dismissal motions, discovery begins. Both sides exchange documents, take depositions, and build their cases.
2028-2029: Settlement negotiations likely begin. Most class actions settle before trial.
Possible Outcomes:
- Settlement (most likely): WWE pays a fund, eligible fans file claims and get refunds
- Trial: If no settlement, a jury decides if WWE’s marketing was deceptive
- Dismissal: Judge could rule in WWE’s favor and throw out the case
Bottom line: Don’t expect quick resolution. This could take years.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the WWE class action lawsuit about?
The WWE class action lawsuit alleges deceptive marketing practices related to WWE’s September 2025 move to ESPN’s streaming platform. Existing ESPN subscribers claim they were misled into believing they’d automatically have access to WWE Premium Live Events, then were forced to pay an additional $29.99/month.
Who filed the WWE class action lawsuit?
Michael Diesa of New Jersey and Rebecca Toback of New York filed the lawsuit on January 8, 2026, in U.S. District Court in Connecticut. They’re representing a proposed class of ESPN subscribers who paid for ESPN DTE despite already having ESPN access through cable or satellite providers.
Am I eligible to join the WWE class action?
You may be eligible if you: (1) Already had ESPN through a cable or satellite TV provider, (2) Subscribed to ESPN’s direct-to-consumer service (ESPN DTE) between August 6, 2025 and September 20, 2025, and (3) Did so specifically to watch WWE Premium Live Events. The class hasn’t been certified yet, so eligibility details could change.
Is there a WWE class action settlement?
No. The lawsuit was just filed on January 8, 2026. There is no settlement, no claim forms, and no deadlines yet. WWE hasn’t even responded to the allegations. Any settlement would be years away.
How much money can I get from the WWE lawsuit?
Unknown. The lawsuit seeks “in excess of $5 million” in total damages. If there’s eventually a settlement, the amount per person would depend on how many people file claims and what formula is used to calculate refunds. Similar cases might result in full or partial refunds of subscription fees.
Why isn’t ESPN being sued?
ESPN’s subscriber agreement includes an arbitration clause and class action waiver that would prevent this type of lawsuit. By suing only WWE, the plaintiffs avoid those legal barriers and can proceed with a class action in court.
What should I do if I paid for ESPN DTE to watch WWE events?
Save all documentation: proof of your cable/satellite ESPN subscription, receipts showing ESPN DTE charges, and any marketing materials you saw. You don’t need to do anything else right now—if the class is certified, you’ll be automatically included if you fit the criteria. Watch for updates in sports and legal news.
How long will the WWE class action lawsuit take?
Class actions typically take 2-4 years from filing to resolution. The lawsuit was filed January 2026, so expect updates throughout 2026-2027 on class certification and dismissal motions. Settlement negotiations, if they happen, likely won’t begin until 2027 or later.
Has WWE responded to the lawsuit?
Not yet. As of January 10, 2026, neither WWE nor ESPN has issued an official response. Companies typically have several weeks to file legal responses after being served with a lawsuit.
Can I still watch WWE PLEs on ESPN?
Yes. The lawsuit doesn’t affect your ability to subscribe to ESPN DTE and watch WWE events. It only challenges whether the marketing was deceptive for people who already had ESPN access through other means.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For specific questions about your situation, consult a qualified attorney.
About the Author
Sarah Klein, JD, is a licensed attorney and legal content strategist with over 12 years of experience across civil, criminal, family, and regulatory law. At All About Lawyer, she covers a wide range of legal topics — from high-profile lawsuits and courtroom stories to state traffic laws and everyday legal questions — all with a focus on accuracy, clarity, and public understanding.
Her writing blends real legal insight with plain-English explanations, helping readers stay informed and legally aware.
Read more about Sarah