Volt Edge Energy Lawsuit. US Court Rejects $6.5M Electrocution Claim, Says Company Not Responsible
A federal judge in Colorado has ruled that Volt Edge Energy is not responsible for the death of a young man who was electrocuted at one of the company’s EV charging sites. The family had asked for $6.5 million in damages, but the court said the company did not cause the accident.
The judge said the electrocution happened while the man was trying to steal copper wiring from a locked electrical cabinet. Because of that, the court also ordered the family to pay for the equipment that was damaged.
The case has been widely discussed online, especially among EV owners, electricians, and people following infrastructure safety issues.
What Was the Lawsuit About?
The family filed the lawsuit after the man, Darius, died at a Volt Edge Energy charging station in Aurora, Colorado. They argued that the company failed to:
- Put up enough warning signs
- Block access to high-voltage areas
- Monitor the station properly
- Follow U.S. electrical safety rules
They claimed that better safety measures might have prevented the death.
What the Judge Found
After reviewing video footage, engineering reports, and safety documents, the court found:
- The victim cut the lock on a restricted cabinet
- He was trying to remove copper cables
- Volt Edge Energy had followed the National Electrical Code (NEC) and U.S. safety requirements
- Warning signs and locked barriers were already in place
Because the electrocution occurred during a break-in, the company was not held responsible.
Why the Family Was Told to Pay Damages
The court said the company suffered financial loss because the cabinet and charging equipment were heavily damaged. Since the damage came from illegal tampering, the family was ordered to pay for repairs.
This type of outcome is uncommon, but similar decisions have been made in U.S. utility cases involving theft or sabotage of electrical equipment.
Online Reaction
People online have had mixed views:
Some say:
- Charging companies shouldn’t be blamed when someone breaks into dangerous electrical equipment
- The company followed the rules, so they shouldn’t be punished
Others say:
- Stations should have better physical barriers
- Extra steps could help prevent injuries even when someone is tampering
The case sparked a broader conversation about the safety of EV charging sites and how much companies need to do beyond the basic requirements.
About Volt Edge Energy
- Based in Denver, Colorado
- Operates EV charging stations across several western states
- Mid-sized company focused on fast-charging systems
The company’s maintenance records and safety documentation played an important role in the judge’s decision.
What This Case Means for EV Charging in the U.S.
Many people in the industry say this situation shows how important it is for companies to:
- Keep detailed safety and maintenance records
- Lock and secure all electrical enclosures
- Use cameras at charging sites
Others believe companies will start adding more security features even if they are not legally required, simply to avoid future disputes.
What Happens Next
Volt Edge Energy
- Won the case
- Will receive payment for repair costs
- May still improve security to prevent similar incidents
The Family
- May decide to appeal, but would need strong evidence that the judge made a legal mistake
About the Author
Sarah Klein, JD, is a licensed attorney and legal content strategist with over 12 years of experience across civil, criminal, family, and regulatory law. At All About Lawyer, she covers a wide range of legal topics — from high-profile lawsuits and courtroom stories to state traffic laws and everyday legal questions — all with a focus on accuracy, clarity, and public understanding.
Her writing blends real legal insight with plain-English explanations, helping readers stay informed and legally aware.
Read more about Sarah