Rich Campbell Lawsuit Update, Azalia Lexi Dismisses Sexual Assault Case With Prejudice in October 2025

The latest Rich Campbell lawsuit update reveals that Azalia Lexi voluntarily dismissed her sexual assault lawsuit against the former OTK co-founder “with prejudice” on October 20, 2025, in New York Supreme Court. This final dismissal means she cannot refile the case, and both parties confirmed no money exchanged hands. Meanwhile, Campbell’s $3.6 million California defamation lawsuit reached a “conditional settlement” in July 2025, with both cases now resolved after nearly three years of legal battles.

This marks the end of parallel lawsuits that devastated Campbell’s gaming career, cost him an estimated $1.8 million in annual income, and forced his resignation from One True King—one of Twitch’s most prominent content creation organizations.

What Is the Latest Rich Campbell Lawsuit Update?

On October 20, 2025, court records from New York Supreme Court (Kings County) show that Alexis Marie Krpan (known as Azalia Lexi) filed a Notice of Discontinuance “with prejudice” in her assault lawsuit against Richard Campbell.

Azalia posted on X (formerly Twitter) the following day: “I have decided to dismiss my lawsuit against Rich Campbell. No payment was offered by either of us to the other. I want to thank everyone for their support over this difficult period, and I wish him well in his future endeavors.”

The dismissal “with prejudice” is legally significant—it prevents Lexi from ever refiling the same sexual assault claims against Campbell in any court. This contrasts with her earlier April 10, 2024, dismissal “without prejudice” that allowed her to refile, which she did in October 2024 before this final resolution.

Simultaneously, Campbell’s Los Angeles Superior Court defamation case (Case No. 23STCV30736) reached a “conditional resolution.” On July 31, 2025, Campbell’s attorneys filed papers with Judge Upinder S. Kalra notifying the court of a “conditional” settlement with the expectation that a dismissal would be filed by September 15, 2025. No settlement terms were publicly revealed.

Background: Who Is Rich Campbell?

Richard William Campbell, known as “Rich Campbell,” is a former professional esports commentator and content creator who co-founded One True King (OTK Media Inc.) alongside fellow streamers including Asmongold, Mizkif, and Tips Out.

Before the allegations surfaced, Campbell was among Twitch’s most prominent gaming personalities. He specialized in World of Warcraft content and competitive esports commentary, building a career that spanned over a decade in the gaming industry.

Based on his 2022 earnings, Campbell expected to make approximately $1.8 million in 2023 through Twitch revenue and contracted sponsorships. OTK Media produced content for various video games and had established itself as a major player in the Twitch streaming ecosystem with millions of combined followers across its co-founders’ channels.

Campbell’s relationship with fellow content creator Mia Malkova, an adult film actress who had transitioned to mainstream gaming content, further elevated his public profile before the controversy erupted.

The Allegations That Changed Everything

On December 15, 2022, Azalia Lexi (real name: Alexis Marie Krpan) publicly accused Rich Campbell of sexual assault through a detailed TwitLonger post and subsequent social media statements.

Lexi, a Twitch streamer, OnlyFans model, and former flight attendant, alleged that Campbell sexually assaulted her during an incident at his apartment in January 2022. She claimed the assault occurred during what began as a consensual encounter but turned non-consensual.

Within hours of the allegations going public, OTK requested Campbell’s resignation. He posted a brief statement on X saying he needed time to “collect his thoughts” and would address the allegations soon—but then went completely silent for over a year.

Multiple other women came forward with similar allegations through social media posts, though Lexi remained the only person to pursue legal action.

The fallout was immediate and devastating. Campbell lost his position at OTK, his Twitch partnerships ended, sponsorship deals evaporated, and he effectively disappeared from public life for months as the gaming community debated the allegations.

The Dual Lawsuits: California and New York Cases

The legal battle unfolded through two separate lawsuits filed in different states, each telling a dramatically different version of events.

Azalia Lexi’s New York Assault Lawsuit

On December 4, 2023—nearly one year after her public allegations—Lexi filed a Personal Injury and Torts lawsuit against Campbell in New York Supreme Court (Kings County). The complaint alleged assault and battery, claiming Campbell forced himself upon her sexually at his apartment, causing physical and emotional harm.

The case experienced multiple procedural twists. Lexi first filed a Notice of Discontinuance without prejudice on April 10, 2024, which allowed her to potentially refile. The case was then refiled in October 2024 before the final dismissal with prejudice on October 20, 2025.

This “with prejudice” dismissal permanently bars Lexi from bringing the same claims again.

Rich Campbell’s California Defamation Lawsuit

On December 15, 2023—just 11 days after Lexi’s New York filing—Campbell filed a comprehensive defamation lawsuit in Los Angeles Superior Court (Case No. 23STCV30736) against Alexis Marie Krpan and ten unnamed “Doe” defendants.

The complaint alleged five causes of action:

• Defamation (libel)
• Intentional interference with contractual relations
• Intentional interference with prospective economic advantage
• Intentional infliction of emotional distress
• Negligent infliction of emotional distress

Campbell sought unspecified compensatory and punitive damages, alleging he lost his entire $1.8 million annual income from Twitch revenue and contracted sponsorships following Lexi’s “false” allegations.

The lawsuit was assigned to Judge Upinder S. Kalra in Department 51. Campbell’s legal team included high-profile entertainment attorney Bryan J. Freedman from Freedman + Taitelman LLP, along with attorneys Brian E. Turnauer and R. Sterling Henderson.

Campbell’s Version of Events: The Defamation Claims

Campbell’s California lawsuit presented a starkly different narrative from Lexi’s assault allegations.

The complaint described the case as “the all-too-typical case of a superfan, or groupie, who has consensual sex with her crush, in this case a popular influencer, demands more of her crush’s time than he can give, and then, when he rejects her demands for a serious relationship, retaliates against him by trying to tarnish his reputation and have him cancelled by posting lies on the internet accusing him of rape.”

According to Campbell’s lawsuit, he and Lexi met in 2018 and began an on-and-off sexual relationship by 2019. Lexi frequently traveled to various U.S. cities to see Campbell at esports events such as the Call of Duty League, and they were intimate on numerous occasions.

The suit alleged Lexi repeatedly requested a serious committed relationship, which Campbell rebuffed because he was not “in the position” to do so. This allegedly resulted in an argument at his apartment in January 2022—the same incident Lexi would later characterize as sexual assault.

Campbell’s legal team argued that nearly a year later, Lexi retaliated through social media. Between December 15, 2022, and June 29, 2023, Lexi made more than a dozen social media posts and comments alleging that Campbell raped her. In June 2023, she allegedly posted on the X page of Campbell’s then-girlfriend Mia Malkova calling him a “rapist.”

The lawsuit claimed these posts were read thousands of times, destroyed Campbell’s reputation, and directly caused his OTK partners to request his resignation from the business he co-founded.

Campbell’s attorney Bryan J. Freedman provided a statement emphasizing the case’s broader implications: “Rich Campbell dedicated his entire adult life to creating content and building one of the most successful brands in the Twitch sphere. All of that work was dismantled in a matter of hours when a woman with whom he had a consensual sexual relationship became enraged after he refused to pursue a more committed relationship and posted false statements on social media meant to destroy Mr. Campbell’s life and livelihood.”

Freedman added: “Mr. Campbell is determined to get justice not just for himself but also for others who may become the targets of future online revenge campaigns based on unproven accusations and lies.”

Timeline of Major Legal Events

December 15, 2022: Azalia Lexi publicly accuses Rich Campbell of sexual assault through TwitLonger post and social media statements

December 15, 2022: Campbell resigns from One True King (OTK) at the organization’s request; posts brief statement saying he will address allegations

December 4, 2023: Lexi files assault lawsuit against Campbell in New York Supreme Court (Kings County)

December 15, 2023: Campbell files $3.6 million defamation lawsuit against Lexi in Los Angeles Superior Court (Case No. 23STCV30736)

January 4, 2024: YouTuber Henry Resilient reveals details of both lawsuits; Campbell’s legal response becomes public

April 10, 2024: Lexi dismisses her New York lawsuit without prejudice (allowing potential refiling)

July 31, 2025: Campbell’s attorneys file notice of “conditional resolution” with Los Angeles court; settlement expected by September 15, 2025

August 27, 2025: Streamer Tectone claims on livestream that Campbell has “won almost all of his cases”

August 28, 2025: Lexi responds denying settlement occurred and stating “this is not true”

October 20, 2025: Lexi files Notice of Discontinuance WITH PREJUDICE in New York Supreme Court, permanently ending her assault lawsuit

October 21, 2025: Lexi confirms on X that she dismissed the lawsuit with no money exchanged by either party

The Conditional Settlement: What We Know

The July 2025 “conditional resolution” filed in Los Angeles Superior Court remains shrouded in confidentiality. No settlement terms were publicly revealed, and neither party has disclosed whether money changed hands or what conditions were agreed upon.

Legal experts note that “conditional” settlements typically include requirements such as:

• Non-disparagement clauses preventing both parties from making negative public statements
• Mutual releases barring future litigation on related claims
• Confidentiality agreements prohibiting disclosure of terms
• Structured payment schedules (if monetary settlement involved)
• Social media content removal or modification requirements

The timing correlation between the California conditional settlement (July 2025) and the New York dismissal with prejudice (October 2025) suggests the cases were resolved together as part of comprehensive settlement negotiations covering both jurisdictions.

Industry observers speculated that Campbell’s legal strategy—filing an aggressive $3.6 million defamation counterclaim—created pressure that led to favorable settlement terms, though this remains unconfirmed without access to the confidential agreement.

Community Reaction and Tectone’s Claims

In late August 2025, controversy erupted when fellow OTK member and streamer John “Tectone” claimed during a livestream that Campbell had “won almost all of his cases” and suggested Campbell might return to streaming.

“I hear he’s winning his cases. Couple of days ago, I heard he won, like, almost all of his cases. I heard he hasn’t lost a single one. And I heard there might even be a chance that Rich might be coming back…Like, can y’all imagine if Rich got fked over that hard, when he didn’t do st?” Tectone said.

Lexi quickly responded on social media disputing Tectone’s characterization, stating “this is not true” and emphasizing that settlement discussions were ongoing but no final resolution had occurred at that time.

Two months later, the October 2025 dismissals validated aspects of both perspectives—Campbell’s defamation case reached conditional settlement (suggesting favorable outcome for him), while Lexi voluntarily dismissed with prejudice confirming no money was paid to either party (supporting her account that she wasn’t pressured through financial means).

The gaming community remains divided. Some view the dismissals and settlement as vindication for Campbell, suggesting the allegations were false or exaggerated. Others argue that settlement and voluntary dismissal don’t prove innocence, noting that victims of sexual assault often choose not to pursue lengthy, traumatic litigation regardless of the merits of their claims.

Legal Implications for Gaming and Content Creation

The Rich Campbell case highlights evolving legal and cultural dynamics in the gaming and content creation industries.

The Power of Public Allegations

Campbell’s case demonstrates how public allegations on social media can instantaneously destroy careers built over decades, regardless of whether those allegations are ultimately proven in court. Within hours of Lexi’s December 2022 posts, Campbell lost his position at OTK and saw his income evaporate completely.

This raises complex questions about justice, due process, and accountability in online communities where allegations can spread to millions of people before any investigation or legal proceeding begins.

Defamation Lawsuits as Counter-Strategy

Campbell’s aggressive legal response—filing a $3.6 million defamation lawsuit with high-profile attorneys—represents an increasingly common strategy for accused content creators. Recent similar cases include:

• Destiny (Steven Bonnell) being sued for $1 million in cyber sexual harassment claims
• Multiple streamers pursuing defamation claims against accusers

Critics argue such lawsuits can create a “chilling effect” that discourages legitimate sexual assault victims from coming forward due to fear of expensive litigation. Supporters contend that defamation laws provide necessary protection against false accusations that destroy reputations and livelihoods.

The Two-Court Strategy

The parallel lawsuits in California (defamation) and New York (assault) created strategic complexity. Campbell’s decision to file in California—where he resides and where his business losses occurred—rather than countersuing in New York’s assault case gave him procedural advantages including choice of judge, jurisdiction-specific defamation laws, and ability to frame the narrative first.

This multi-jurisdictional litigation strategy is becoming more common in high-profile internet personality disputes.

What Happens Next?

With both lawsuits now dismissed and settled, several questions remain about the next chapter.

Will Rich Campbell Return to Content Creation?

Campbell has remained almost entirely silent on social media since December 2022. His last substantial public statements were his brief resignation post and cryptic references to eventually sharing his side of the story.

With the legal matters resolved, Campbell theoretically could attempt a return to streaming. However, the gaming community’s reception remains uncertain. Tectone’s August 2025 suggestion that Campbell “might be coming back” generated mixed reactions, with some fans expressing support while others vowed to boycott any platform that hosts him.

The precedent set by other content creators who faced similar allegations suggests return paths are possible but difficult. Successful comebacks typically require comprehensive public statements, accountability (whether admitting fault or providing detailed rebuttals), and rebuilding trust over extended periods.

Could Campbell Return to OTK?

Campbell’s return to One True King appears highly unlikely despite the legal resolution. OTK requested his resignation immediately after allegations surfaced, and the organization has continued operating successfully without him throughout 2023-2025.

The remaining OTK co-founders—including Asmongold, Mizkif, Tips Out, and others—have not publicly discussed Campbell since his departure. Reintegrating someone at the center of such controversy could damage OTK’s brand and relationships with sponsors, platforms, and viewers.

Ongoing Reputation Challenges

Even with favorable legal outcomes, Campbell faces substantial obstacles rebuilding his reputation and career:

Sponsor Relationships: Major gaming brands that previously sponsored Campbell will likely hesitate to resume partnerships given the controversy and three-year absence from content creation.

Platform Trust: Twitch and other streaming platforms have become increasingly cautious about creators with misconduct allegations, even when unproven or disputed.

Audience Rebuilding: Campbell lost nearly three years of audience building and engagement during his absence, while competitors filled the void in his content niches.

Permanent Online Records: Despite case dismissals, the allegations and controversy will remain permanently searchable online, affecting Campbell’s digital footprint indefinitely.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the latest update on the Rich Campbell lawsuit?

On October 20, 2025, Azalia Lexi voluntarily dismissed her sexual assault lawsuit against Rich Campbell “with prejudice” in New York Supreme Court, meaning she cannot refile. Both parties confirmed no money was exchanged. Campbell’s California defamation lawsuit reached a “conditional settlement” in July 2025, with confidential terms.

Did Rich Campbell win his defamation lawsuit?

Campbell’s $3.6 million defamation lawsuit reached a “conditional resolution” in July 2025 as reported to Los Angeles Superior Court. The specific settlement terms remain confidential, so it’s unclear whether Campbell received monetary damages or other forms of relief. The case was settled rather than decided by a judge or jury.

Why did Azalia Lexi drop her lawsuit against Rich Campbell?

Lexi dismissed her assault lawsuit “with prejudice” on October 20, 2025, and stated on social media that “no payment was offered by either of us to the other.” Her reasons for dismissing remain her own, but the timing suggests coordination with the California defamation case settlement reached in July 2025.

What were the allegations against Rich Campbell?

In December 2022, Azalia Lexi publicly accused Campbell of sexual assault, claiming he forced himself upon her at his apartment in January 2022. Campbell denied the allegations and filed a $3.6 million defamation lawsuit arguing the sexual encounter was consensual and that Lexi retaliated with false accusations after he refused to pursue a committed relationship.

Can Rich Campbell return to streaming and OTK?

Legally, Campbell could return to content creation now that both lawsuits are resolved. However, practical obstacles include damaged reputation, lost sponsor relationships, three-year absence from audience building, and likely resistance from One True King which requested his resignation and has continued successfully without him.

What does “dismissed with prejudice” mean for the Rich Campbell case?

“With prejudice” means Azalia Lexi permanently waived her right to refile the same sexual assault claims against Campbell in any court. This contrasts with her earlier April 2024 dismissal “without prejudice” which allowed refiling. The October 2025 dismissal with prejudice provides Campbell legal finality.

How much did the Rich Campbell lawsuit cost him?

Campbell’s lawsuit claimed he lost his entire expected $1.8 million annual income from Twitch revenue and sponsorships following the allegations. Additionally, he incurred substantial legal fees for nearly two years of litigation with high-profile attorneys. The total financial impact likely exceeded $3-4 million including lost income and legal costs.

Related Legal Resources for Content Creators

Understanding your legal rights and responsibilities as a content creator is crucial in today’s digital landscape:

• Is Verbal Assault Actually a Crime?
• Questions to Ask a Lawyer When Starting a Business
• What Is Business Litigation Law

Protecting Your Reputation Online

The Rich Campbell case offers important lessons for content creators and public figures navigating allegations and online controversies:

Document Everything: Maintain records of all communications, relationships, and relevant interactions that could later become disputed.

Consult Attorneys Early: Don’t wait for lawsuits to be filed. Speak with attorneys experienced in defamation and internet law as soon as allegations surface.

Consider Response Strategies Carefully: Silence, public statements, and legal action each carry different risks and benefits. Work with legal counsel and PR professionals to evaluate options.

Understand Platform Policies: Twitch, YouTube, and other platforms have specific policies about accusations and investigations that can affect your account status.

Prepare for Long-Term Impact: Even favorable legal outcomes don’t erase online records or immediately restore lost sponsorships and audience trust.

Know Defamation Law Basics: Understand the elements required to prove defamation in your jurisdiction, including the different standards for public vs. private figures.

The Bottom Line

The Rich Campbell lawsuit saga reached its conclusion in October 2025 when Azalia Lexi dismissed her assault case with prejudice after Campbell’s defamation lawsuit settled conditionally in July 2025. No money exchanged hands according to both parties, though confidential settlement terms remain undisclosed.

The case cost Campbell his position at One True King, an estimated $1.8 million in annual income, and nearly three years of his content creation career. Whether he can rebuild his reputation and return to streaming remains uncertain as the gaming community processes the legal resolution.

For the broader gaming and content creation industry, the case underscores the devastating impact of public allegations, the complexity of he-said/she-said disputes, and the challenges of balancing accountability for misconduct with protection against false accusations.

Need Legal Guidance? If you’re a content creator facing allegations, considering defamation claims, or navigating online controversies, consult with qualified attorneys experienced in internet law, defamation, and entertainment litigation. The information in this article provides general education about the Rich Campbell case but should not be used as a substitute for personalized legal advice.

About the Author

Sarah Klein, JD, is a licensed attorney and legal content strategist with over 12 years of experience across civil, criminal, family, and regulatory law. At All About Lawyer, she covers a wide range of legal topics — from high-profile lawsuits and courtroom stories to state traffic laws and everyday legal questions — all with a focus on accuracy, clarity, and public understanding.
Her writing blends real legal insight with plain-English explanations, helping readers stay informed and legally aware.
Read more about Sarah