Red Bull, the popular energy drink brand known for its tagline “Red Bull gives you wings,” has agreed to settle a class action lawsuit for $13 million. The lawsuit accused the company of misleading advertising by promoting its energy drinks as more effective than a cup of coffee. Despite the settlement, Red Bull denies any wrongdoing, emphasizing the metaphorical nature of its marketing claims.
Table of Contents
Background of the Lawsuit, Allegations of Deceptive Advertising
In January 2013, Benjamin Careathers, a New York resident, filed a class action lawsuit against Red Bull in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Careathers, a long-time consumer of the drink, alleged that Red Bull’s slogan, “Red Bull gives you wings,” was misleading. The lawsuit argued that the company’s marketing implied that its energy drink provided superior performance-enhancing effects, which was not supported by scientific evidence.
Key Allegations:
Red Bull’s claims about increased concentration, performance, and reaction speed.
The drink’s caffeine content is no higher than a regular cup of coffee.
Red Bull’s drinks contained 80mg of caffeine per 250ml can, far less than the 150mg found in a standard 12oz cup of coffee.
Careathers claimed that these misleading advertisements made consumers believe that Red Bull provided greater benefits than ordinary caffeine sources, justifying a higher price point for the product.
The case centered around whether Red Bull’s advertisements crossed the line from “puffery” (exaggerated claims not meant to be taken literally) into deceptive and fraudulent marketing. The plaintiff argued that the advertisements were not simply exaggerations but actionable misrepresentations under U.S. law.
In its defense, Red Bull maintained that the slogan was a metaphor and that the marketing materials were accurate. The company argued that its advertisements aimed to highlight the energizing effects of the drink, not suggest literal “wings.”
Settlement Agreement: $13 Million Compensation
In October 2014, Red Bull agreed to pay $13 million to settle the class action lawsuit. The settlement, which applies only to U.S. consumers, offers those who purchased Red Bull products from January 1, 2002, to October 3, 2014, the option to receive:
$10 cash reimbursement
$15 worth of Red Bull products (two cans of Red Bull)
The settlement was designed to compensate millions of consumers who may have been misled by the company’s marketing practices. Notably, no proof of purchase was required for consumers to make a claim, and a deadline of March 2015 was set for submissions.
Red Bull’s Response, Denial of Wrongdoing
While the company agreed to settle the case to avoid lengthy and costly litigation, Red Bull insisted that it had never engaged in deceptive advertising. The company issued a statement expressing that its marketing was truthful and accurate and that the decision to settle was made solely to avoid the costs and distractions associated with prolonged legal proceedings.
In addition, Red Bull agreed to voluntarily update its marketing materials and product labeling to ensure clarity for U.S. consumers.
Legal Implications, Setting a Precedent for False Advertising Cases
This lawsuit sets an important legal precedent for future false advertising claims, particularly in industries that rely on bold marketing slogans. The case raises questions about the ethical limits of advertising and the responsibility of companies to provide truthful and substantiated claims about their products.
Legal Reference:
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case No. 13-cv-03440)
Federal Trade Commission (FTC) guidelines on deceptive advertising
Legal experts suggest that this case could influence future consumer protection lawsuits, particularly in industries where companies make bold claims about the effectiveness of their products without sufficient evidence.
FAQs About Red Bull ‘Gives You Wings’ Lawsuit
Who won the Red Bull ‘Gives You Wings’ lawsuit?
The lawsuit was settled in favor of the plaintiffs. Red Bull agreed to a $13 million settlement to resolve the class action, although the company denied any wrongdoing.
What is Red Bull’s new slogan after the lawsuit?
Red Bull has updated its marketing materials but continues to use similar advertising slogans. The company maintains that the “Red Bull gives you wings” tagline is a metaphor and has not completely replaced it with a new slogan.
What is the payout date for the Red Bull lawsuit?
The settlement deadline for claims was March 2015. However, the exact payout date varies based on the claims process, with payments typically processed after claims are reviewed.
How can I claim my payout from the Red Bull lawsuit?
Consumers who purchased Red Bull between January 1, 2002, and October 3, 2014, could claim either $10 cash or $15 worth of Red Bull products. Claims could be made online, and no proof of purchase was required.
How much can I get from the Red Bull lawsuit settlement?
Eligible consumers could receive either:
$10 in cash, or
$15 worth of Red Bull products (two cans of Red Bull).
Can I still make a claim for the Red Bull lawsuit?
The claims process for this lawsuit ended in 2015. Consumers are no longer able to submit claims for compensation related to this particular settlement.
Why did Red Bull settle the lawsuit?
Red Bull settled to avoid the unpredictability and high costs of continued litigation, despite denying any wrongdoing or false advertising.
Who can claim the Red Bull settlement?
The settlement applied to U.S. residents who purchased Red Bull products between January 1, 2002, and October 3, 2014.
How many people were affected by the Red Bull lawsuit?
Millions of U.S. consumers who purchased Red Bull during the specified period were eligible for compensation as part of the class action settlement.
What were the legal grounds for the Red Bull lawsuit?
The lawsuit alleged false advertising and claimed that Red Bull’s marketing misled consumers by implying its products provided superior energy benefits, unsupported by scientific evidence.
Conclusion, Impact on Red Bull and Advertising Ethics
The $13 million settlement marks the end of a protracted legal trial for Red Bull, but it also raises important questions about advertising practices in the food and beverage industry. Although Red Bull denies any wrongdoing, the lawsuit has highlighted the need for transparency and accuracy in marketing claims. It also serves as a reminder that consumers may be entitled to compensation if companies engage in deceptive practices.
The settlement signals a growing awareness of consumers’ rights and the importance of holding companies accountable for false advertising, ensuring that such claims are not made without proper substantiation.
