Nevada Restaurant Services $1.2M Sexual Harassment Settlement, Who Qualifies and How to File Before May 11, 2026

Nevada Restaurant Services Inc. — the Las Vegas-based company that owns Dotty’s gaming taverns, Laughlin River Lodge casino-hotel, Bourbon Street, and Red Dragon locations — has agreed to pay $1.2 million to settle a federal sexual harassment lawsuit filed by the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. 

The EEOC accused the company of allowing ongoing verbal and physical sexual harassment of both male and female employees across its locations for years, and of failing to act even after workers formally complained. If you worked at any Nevada Restaurant Services location between January 1, 2019 and October 14, 2025, you may be entitled to a cash payment — but the deadline to file your claim is May 11, 2026.

Quick Facts

• Case name: EEOC v. Nevada Restaurant Services Inc., Case No. 2:23-cv-01307
• Settlement amount: $1,200,000 — full amount goes to eligible employees, no deductions for attorney fees
• Who filed the lawsuit: The US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
• Who qualifies: Current and former Nevada Restaurant Services employees who experienced sexual harassment or were constructively discharged between January 1, 2019 and October 14, 2025
• Claim deadline: May 11, 2026
• How to file: Online or by mail — you need your CPT ID and passcode from your settlement notice
• Settlement administrator: CPT Group Inc., 1-888-468-0584 | [email protected]
• Official claim website: williamsphhsettlement.com (for PHH) — and for NRS, the claim is filed through CPT Group directly at the settlement portal — cptgroup.com/EEOC-NRS or by contacting CPT Group at 1-888-468-0584
• NRS’s position: The company agreed to settle and implement new anti-harassment measures but has not admitted wrongdoing

This is not a typical corporate settlement where a company quietly writes a check and moves on. This case involved a federal government agency — the EEOC — taking a hospitality employer to court over years of alleged sexual harassment so severe that some employees felt they had no choice but to quit their jobs entirely. And unlike most class action settlements where attorney fees eat up a large portion of the fund, the settlement administrator will use the entire $1,200,000 settlement fund to pay eligible class members. Every dollar goes to the workers who were harmed.

Who Is Nevada Restaurant Services and What Did They Do?

Nevada Restaurant Services Inc. is a Las Vegas-based company that owns and operates the Laughlin River Lodge casino-hotel as well as the Dotty’s, Bourbon Street and Red Dragon chains of casinos and sports bars. NRS owns approximately 175 Dotty’s locations across multiple US states including Nevada, Oregon, and Montana.

The EEOC filed its lawsuit against the company in 2023 after first trying to resolve the matter through its standard pre-litigation process — a process the EEOC is required by law to attempt before going to court. When those efforts failed to produce a resolution, the agency filed suit in US District Court for Nevada.

The EEOC’s lawsuit alleged that since at least 2018, male and female employees of Nevada Restaurant Services were subjected to both verbal and physical sexual harassment by co-workers and supervisors. The agency also alleged the company knew of the harassment and failed to effectively address complaints.

The details described in court documents are serious. According to court records, at the Laughlin property, male employees subjected female employees to unwanted physical sexual advances, including the attempted rape of a 19-year-old employee, groping, and stalking female employees outside the workplace, or trapping them in tight spaces within the workplace such as walk-in refrigerators or locked hotel rooms in order to make unwanted sexual advances.

The EEOC alleged that since 2018, several male and female employees suffered verbal and physical sexual harassment from co-workers and supervisors, and that the company knew about the issues but failed to address complaints.

When a workplace becomes so hostile that employees feel they have no real choice but to resign, the law recognizes this as “constructive discharge” — a form of forced termination. The EEOC included constructive discharge claims in its lawsuit alongside the harassment allegations, meaning employees who quit because of the hostile environment may be just as eligible as those who were formally terminated.

The Settlement and What It Requires From the Company

The case was resolved through a consent decree — a court-enforced agreement that is signed by both parties and overseen by a federal judge. In addition to the $1.2 million in monetary relief, Nevada Restaurant Services agreed to post a notice of the settlement and to implement additional measures to deter and respond to incidents of sexual harassment.

As part of the settlement, Nevada Restaurant Services will implement new procedures, including training for all employees about sexual harassment and reporting procedures, with additional training for managers and human resources representatives. It will also establish an online complaint procedure and systems to properly address complaints.

The consent decree runs for three years and is enforceable by the court — meaning if Nevada Restaurant Services fails to follow through on any of these commitments, the EEOC can go back to the judge and seek enforcement. This is significantly stronger than a private settlement where a company simply pays and walks away with no ongoing obligations.

The EEOC’s regional attorney Anna Park put it plainly: it is not enough for companies to simply pay a fine. Employers must put real systems in place, hold managers accountable, and create environments where workers can safely report harassment without fear of retaliation.

Who Is Eligible to File a Claim?

Eligibility for this settlement is straightforward compared to most class action cases. You may qualify if all three of the following apply to you:

1. You worked for Nevada Restaurant Services Inc. at any of its locations — including Dotty’s, Laughlin River Lodge, Bourbon Street, Red Dragon, or any other NRS-operated property — at any point between January 1, 2019 and October 14, 2025.

2. You experienced unlawful sexual harassment during your employment with the company. This includes unwanted physical contact, verbal harassment, a hostile work environment based on sex, or conduct that a reasonable person would find offensive and severe enough to interfere with their ability to do their job.

3. You experienced constructive discharge — meaning the harassment was so severe and ongoing that you felt forced to quit your job, even though you were never formally fired.

Both current and former employees are eligible regardless of gender. The settlement covers all Nevada Restaurant Services Inc. locations, and there is no restriction based on job title or department.

This is an important detail worth emphasizing: this settlement covers both male and female employees. Sexual harassment in the workplace affects workers of all genders, and the EEOC specifically brought this case on behalf of both male and female victims.

How Much Money Will Each Person Receive?

The specific amount each person will receive depends on several factors, including the number of approved claimants and the severity of each claim. The EEOC will review each claims questionnaire to assess eligibility and determine the compensation amount for each claimant.

This is different from most settlements covered here. Rather than a simple pro rata split, the EEOC will evaluate each claim individually and assign compensation based on what each person experienced. Someone who endured severe physical harassment over an extended period may receive significantly more than someone who experienced a shorter or less severe situation.

Because the entire $1.2 million fund goes directly to claimants with no attorney fee deductions, the potential individual payouts here are more meaningful than in many comparable settlements. The exact amounts will not be known until after the claim deadline passes and the EEOC completes its review process.

How to File Your Claim — Step by Step

Step 1: Find your CPT ID and passcode. If you are an eligible class member, the settlement administrator should have mailed you a notice containing a unique CPT ID and passcode. These are required to file your claim online. Check any mail you may have received regarding this settlement.

Step 2: Choose how to file.

• Online: Visit the official settlement website and log in using your CPT ID and passcode to complete the online claim form
• Official claim website: williamsphhsettlement.com (for PHH) — and for NRS, the claim is filed through CPT Group directly at the settlement portal — cptgroup.com/EEOC-NRS or by contacting CPT Group at 1-888-468-0584: 
• By mail: Download the PDF claim form, complete it, and mail it to:

EEOC v. Nevada Restaurant Services Inc. c/o CPT Group Inc. PO Box 19504 Irvine, CA 92623

Step 3: Complete the claims questionnaire honestly and thoroughly. Because the EEOC will review each submission individually to assess the severity of what you experienced, the detail you provide in your questionnaire directly affects your compensation. Describe what happened to you as specifically and accurately as possible — dates, locations, names of people involved, whether you reported it and to whom, and how it affected your work and your decision to stay or leave.

Did not receive a notice? If you believe you qualify but never received a notice with your CPT ID and passcode, contact the settlement administrator directly:

• Phone: 1-888-468-0584
• Email: [email protected]

Do not assume you are ineligible simply because the notice did not reach you. Addresses change, mail gets lost, and people move. Reach out to CPT Group directly to confirm whether you are in the class.

The deadline is May 11, 2026. After that date, no new claims will be accepted.

What Is Constructive Discharge and Does It Apply to You?

Many former NRS employees may not realize they have a valid claim because they were never formally fired — they quit. This is exactly the situation constructive discharge law is designed to address.

Constructive discharge occurs when an employer allows a workplace to become so unbearable — through harassment, discrimination, or hostile conditions — that a reasonable person in the employee’s position would feel they had no real option other than to resign. Under federal law, quitting under these circumstances is treated the same as being fired without cause.

If you left your job at any Nevada Restaurant Services location because the harassment made it impossible to keep working there, you may have a constructive discharge claim just as valid as someone who was formally let go. This is why filing a claim — even if you resigned — is worth doing before the May 11 deadline.

To understand your rights as an employee facing harassment or a hostile workplace in more depth, our Employment Lawyer guide covers what federal law requires from employers and what options workers have when those requirements are not met. Our article on workplace discrimination also breaks down how hostile work environment claims work under Title VII and what steps employees can take when their employer fails to act.

Why the EEOC Filing This Case Matters

Most workplace harassment settlements happen privately — a company settles with individual employees through quiet agreements, often with non-disclosure clauses attached. Victims get paid, the problem stays hidden, and the company faces no public accountability.

This case is different because the EEOC filed it as a federal lawsuit on behalf of affected workers. That means:

The evidence was strong enough for a federal agency to stake its resources on it. The EEOC does not file lawsuits lightly. Before going to court, the agency attempted to resolve the matter through its conciliation process. When that failed, the EEOC concluded the evidence of ongoing, systemic harassment was serious enough to pursue in federal court.

The company faces ongoing court oversight. Unlike a private settlement, the consent decree keeps a federal judge involved for three full years. If NRS fails to implement the required anti-harassment training, complaint systems, and management accountability measures, the EEOC can return to court.

This case is part of a broader pattern in the hospitality industry. The EEOC’s regional attorney Anna Park has noted that sexual harassment in the restaurant and hospitality industry is one of the most common charges the agency receives. The combination of shift work, informal management cultures, and power imbalances between supervisors and hourly workers creates environments where harassment can go unchecked for years.

If you have followed other workplace harassment cases in the news recently, you may recall that Blake Lively’s sexual harassment lawsuit against Justin Baldoni moved to trial in March 2026 — a case that put workplace harassment in entertainment under intense public scrutiny. The NRS settlement reinforces the same message but in an industry where workers have far fewer resources and far less public attention: harassment in the workplace is illegal regardless of industry, and the EEOC will pursue employers who allow it to continue

What Happens If You Do Nothing?

If you are an eligible class member and you do nothing before May 11, 2026, you will not receive any payment from this settlement — and you will lose your right to pursue individual legal claims against Nevada Restaurant Services for the same harassment.

Because this case was brought by the EEOC under a consent decree rather than a traditional opt-in class action, the dynamics are slightly different from standard class action settlements. If you have questions about whether you should file a claim, opt out, or pursue independent legal action — particularly if you experienced severe harassment and believe your individual damages exceed what the settlement may provide — speaking with an employment attorney who handles workplace discrimination cases is a smart first step. Many offer free consultations and can give you a clear picture of your options before the deadline.

Key Legal Terms Explained

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964: The federal law that prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. It covers sexual harassment as a form of sex discrimination and applies to employers with 15 or more employees.

Sexual Harassment: Under Title VII, sexual harassment includes unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature that creates a hostile or abusive work environment or affects employment decisions.

Constructive Discharge: When an employer knowingly allows working conditions to become so intolerable — typically through harassment or discrimination — that a reasonable employee feels forced to resign. Courts treat this as the legal equivalent of being fired.

Consent Decree: A court-approved settlement agreement that is legally enforceable by the court. Unlike a private settlement, a consent decree keeps the court involved and allows the government to seek enforcement if the company fails to follow through on its obligations.

EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission): The federal agency responsible for enforcing federal laws that prohibit workplace discrimination, including sexual harassment. The EEOC investigates complaints, attempts to resolve them through conciliation, and files lawsuits when necessary.

Hostile Work Environment: A form of workplace harassment where unwelcome conduct based on a protected characteristic — in this case, sex — is severe or pervasive enough to create an abusive working environment that a reasonable person would find intimidating or offensive.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. If you have questions about your eligibility, the claims process, or your individual legal rights, please contact the settlement administrator at 1-888-468-0584 or consult a qualified employment attorney in your state.

Sources: EEOC v. Nevada Restaurant Services Inc., Case No. 2:23-cv-01307 (D. Nev.) | EEOC official press release, November 18, 2025 | Las Vegas Review-Journal, November 2025 | ClaimDepot.com settlement report, March 2026 | CPT Group settlement administration notice

About the Author

Sarah Klein, JD, is a licensed attorney and legal content strategist with over 12 years of experience across civil, criminal, family, and regulatory law. At All About Lawyer, she covers a wide range of legal topics — from high-profile lawsuits and courtroom stories to state traffic laws and everyday legal questions — all with a focus on accuracy, clarity, and public understanding.
Her writing blends real legal insight with plain-English explanations, helping readers stay informed and legally aware.
Read more about Sarah