Meta Class Action Over Scam Ads & Stock Manipulation, 2026 Status

Quick Facts

• Lawsuit type: Proposed consumer class action — not a securities class action
• Primary defendant: Meta Platforms, Inc. (Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp)
• Most recent case: Irving, et al. v. Meta Platforms, Inc. — filed February 5, 2026, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
• Nature of allegations: Meta allegedly enabled scammers to use its advertising tools to run pump-and-dump stock schemes that cost consumers over $500 million
• Stock targeted: Jayud Global Logistics (NASDAQ: JYD) — class period March 21 – April 2, 2025
• Settlement status: No settlement exists — early-stage active litigation
• Claim deadline: None — no claims process is open
• Official website: None — no settlement administrator appointed

Multiple class action lawsuits filed in California federal court allege that Meta Platforms knowingly allowed scammers to run fraudulent investment ads on Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp that lured consumers into pump-and-dump stock schemes. The most recent case, filed February 5, 2026, focuses on a scheme that reportedly cost Facebook and Instagram users over $500 million after they were misled into buying shares of Jayud Global Logistics (JYD), a Chinese stock listed on NASDAQ. No settlement has been reached. No claim forms are available. These cases are in the earliest stages of litigation.

What Is the Meta Scam Ads Lawsuit About?

The 35-page lawsuit contends that Meta accepts business from scammers who, after purchasing advertising space on Instagram, Facebook, and WhatsApp, prey on unsuspecting users with the promise of life-changing investment opportunities. The suit accuses Meta of failing to implement technology, devote personnel, and design processes to monitor, identify, and prevent scam ads.

The scheme at the center of the most recent case worked like this: Scammers acquired 50 million shares of JYD stock in December 2024 at highly discounted prices and “pumped” the share price up to a high of nearly $8 per share before the “dump” phase of the scam commenced. Consumers who bought shares during this period were left holding stocks that had rapidly declined in value.

Plaintiffs argue that Meta has “long been aware” of scam ads on Facebook and Instagram due to lawsuits dating back as early as January 2018, but that in recent years, Meta has canned anti-scam initiatives that CEO Mark Zuckerberg believed were not worth the investment.

There Are Several Related Meta Lawsuits — Here Is What Each Covers

The “$500 million” figure that appears in search results refers to total alleged consumer losses — not a settlement amount. Three separate class actions make up the broader pattern of Meta scam ads litigation:

The JYD lawsuit (Irving, et al. v. Meta Platforms, Inc., filed February 5, 2026) is the most recent. It seeks to represent anyone who was lured into investing in JYD between March 21, 2025 and April 2, 2025, directly or indirectly as a result of fraudulent advertisements on Facebook and Instagram and suffered losses as a result.

The CLEU lawsuit (filed July 2025) alleges that plaintiffs lost more than $3 million from investing in China Liberal Education Holdings Ltd. (CLEU), advertised on Facebook and Instagram, and seeks to represent a nationwide class of individuals who invested in CLEU between January 22 and January 30, 2025.

The financial professional impersonation lawsuit (Suddeth, et al. v. Meta Platforms Inc., et al., Case No. 5:25-cv-08581, filed October 2025) is different in scope. It seeks to represent financial professionals in the U.S. whose names, voices, likenesses, credentials, images, branding or professional personas were, between January 1, 2023 and the present, used without their consent in paid advertisements for securities or other investment opportunities on Meta’s platforms.

These three lawsuits are separate proceedings. None has been consolidated into a single MDL as of February 28, 2026.

Who Is Affected?

Each lawsuit proposes a different class of potential plaintiffs:

The JYD lawsuit covers consumers who saw fraudulent JYD ads on Facebook or Instagram during the two-week class period (March 21 – April 2, 2025) and invested in JYD as a result, suffering financial losses.

The CLEU lawsuit covers consumers who invested in CLEU stock as a result of fraudulent Facebook or Instagram ads during its class period (January 22 – 30, 2025).

The financial professional lawsuit covers licensed financial advisors and professionals whose identities were used without permission in scam investment ads on Meta platforms since January 1, 2023.

Important: No class has been certified in any of these cases. Until a court certifies a class, there is no formal membership list and no mechanism to join or file a claim.

Legal Claims and Case Status

All three lawsuits are in the earliest stage of litigation — recently filed proposed class actions with no rulings, no motions resolved, and no settlement discussions disclosed.

The primary legal claims across these cases include:

Aiding and abetting fraud — Plaintiffs argue Meta didn’t just passively host scam ads; it actively provided the targeting tools, data, and infrastructure that made the schemes effective. Plaintiffs argue that by charging higher prices to suspected scammers rather than banning them, Meta knowingly profited from the risk they introduced to users. This legal angle attempts to bypass Section 230 immunity by focusing on Meta’s revenue conduct rather than the content itself.

Negligence — Plaintiffs claim Meta failed to take reasonable steps to screen advertisers and protect users from foreseeable fraud, despite having been warned repeatedly through prior lawsuits and regulatory notices.

Violations of California consumer protection law — Multiple complaints include claims under the California Unfair Competition Law and related statutes that prohibit deceptive business practices.

Lanham Act / right of publicity — The financial professional impersonation lawsuit brings additional claims for unauthorized commercial use of real individuals’ names and likenesses.

No trial dates have been set. No motions to dismiss have been ruled upon.

No Settlement Exists — What That Means for Consumers

There is no settlement, no settlement administrator, no settlement website, and no claim form for any of these Meta scam ads lawsuits. Anyone claiming otherwise is not accurately representing the status of these cases.

If you lost money investing in JYD, CLEU, or another stock after seeing investment ads on Facebook, Instagram, or WhatsApp, there is no formal action to take as a class member at this stage. You should document and preserve all evidence — screenshots of ads, investment records, transaction statements, and any communications with whoever ran the investment group — in case the litigation progresses and a class is certified.

Consumers who believe they suffered significant individual losses may wish to consult an attorney to evaluate whether they have grounds for an individual claim, which would not depend on the class action proceedings.

What Meta Says

As of February 28, 2026, Meta has not publicly responded to the Irving lawsuit filed February 5, 2026. In a separate move, Meta announced it is taking its own legal action against deceptive advertisers, filing multiple lawsuits against scam advertisers in Brazil, China, and Vietnam, and issuing cease-and-desist letters to marketing consultants who advertised the ability to evade Meta’s enforcement systems. Meta has not admitted any liability in the consumer class actions.

Key Dates

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Meta scam ads lawsuit about? 

Multiple proposed class actions allege Meta knowingly allowed scammers to buy ads on Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp to run pump-and-dump stock schemes. Plaintiffs say Meta’s advertising tools, targeting data, and failure to remove known scam ads made the schemes possible and profitable.

Who is affected? 

The proposed classes cover consumers who lost money investing in specific stocks — JYD or CLEU — after seeing fraudulent ads on Meta platforms during defined class periods in 2025. A separate lawsuit covers financial professionals whose identities were used without consent in investment scam ads.

What is the current case status? 

All three cases are in early-stage litigation — recently filed proposed class actions. No class has been certified, no motions have been ruled on, and no trial dates have been set. These cases could take years to resolve.

Is this a class action? 

These are proposed class actions. A court has not yet certified any class in these cases. Class certification — the court’s formal approval of a case proceeding on behalf of a group — must still occur before any class formally exists.

Has a settlement been reached? 

No. There is no settlement in any of the Meta scam ads class actions as of February 28, 2026. The “$500 million” figure in news coverage refers to alleged consumer losses from the JYD scheme — not a settlement amount. No claims process is open.

What happens next? 

The defendants will likely respond to the complaints by filing motions to dismiss or answers. Plaintiffs will then seek class certification. This process typically takes one to three years. A settlement, if any, would come later and would require court approval before any claims period opens.

Can I do anything right now if I lost money? 

No formal claim process exists. Preserve all evidence — screenshots of ads you saw, brokerage records showing your purchases, and any communications from investment groups. Consult a licensed attorney if you suffered significant losses and want to evaluate individual legal options.

How is this different from the Meta securities fraud lawsuits against Meta stock investors? 

These scam ads lawsuits are brought by consumers who lost money investing in third-party stocks promoted through Meta ads — not investors in Meta’s own stock. Separate securities class actions by Meta shareholders (over Meta’s own stock price disclosures) are unrelated proceedings.

Last Updated: February 28, 2026

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Legal claims and outcomes depend on specific facts and applicable law. For questions regarding this lawsuit or potential settlement, consult official court records through PACER or a qualified attorney. Information in this article is current as of the last update date and may change as the case proceeds.

About the Author

Sarah Klein, JD, is a licensed attorney and legal content strategist with over 12 years of experience across civil, criminal, family, and regulatory law. At All About Lawyer, she covers a wide range of legal topics — from high-profile lawsuits and courtroom stories to state traffic laws and everyday legal questions — all with a focus on accuracy, clarity, and public understanding.
Her writing blends real legal insight with plain-English explanations, helping readers stay informed and legally aware.
Read more about Sarah