Instagram Class Action Lawsuit, Mental Health Crisis Allegations, Biometric Privacy Violations & December 2025 Legal Developments

Meta Faces 2,191 Addiction Claims as Families Demand Accountability for Teen Mental Health Harm

Instagram faces two major class action lawsuits: a completed $68.5 million Illinois biometric privacy settlement that paid users $32.56 each in 2024, and an ongoing multidistrict litigation with 2,191 cases alleging the platform deliberately designed addictive features causing mental health harm to minors. The social media addiction MDL moves toward bellwether trials in 2025, with potential damages ranging from hundreds of thousands to millions per case.

What Is the Instagram Class Action Lawsuit?

Instagram currently faces litigation on two fronts—a completed biometric privacy settlement and an active mental health addiction lawsuit involving thousands of families.

The Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) settlement resolved claims that Instagram collected facial recognition data from 4 million Illinois users between August 10, 2015, and August 16, 2023, without proper consent. Meta agreed to pay $68.5 million in 2024, with eligible claimants receiving approximately $32.56 each through direct deposit or checks distributed in June 2024.

The social media addiction litigation represents a far more extensive legal battle. As of December 2025, MDL No. 3047 (In re: Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Products Liability Litigation) consolidates 2,191 cases in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California under Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Families allege Meta intentionally engineered Instagram with addictive features—infinite scroll, autoplay videos, strategically-timed notifications, and visible “like” counts—knowing these mechanisms harm adolescent mental health.

Main Allegations Against Instagram

Mental Health Addiction Claims

Plaintiffs claim Instagram’s design exploits adolescent brain development for profit. Key allegations include:

• Addictive Design Features: Infinite scroll, autoplay videos, push notifications, and algorithmic content feeds engineered to maximize screen time and user engagement
• Targeting Vulnerable Users: Internal Meta documents allegedly reveal the company viewed pre-adolescent susceptibility to addiction as a profit opportunity starting in 2006
• Failure to Warn: Despite internal research showing links between Instagram use and depression, anxiety, body dysmorphia, eating disorders, self-harm, and suicidal ideation, Meta allegedly failed to warn users or implement meaningful safeguards
• Concealment of Harm: Lawsuits cite internal Meta research, including the shut-down Project Mercury (2019-2020), which reportedly found causal links between reduced Facebook use and improved wellbeing

A 13-year-old girl filed a proposed class action in August 2024 seeking $5 billion in damages, alleging Instagram deliberately implemented features to keep teens engaged despite knowing the platform harmed children.

Illinois Biometric Privacy Violations

The completed BIPA lawsuit alleged:

• Unauthorized Data Collection: Instagram’s facial tagging suggestions and filters collected users’ unique facial geometry without written consent required under Illinois law
• Violation Period: Illegal collection occurred from August 10, 2015, until Instagram disabled facial recognition features in November 2021
• Lack of Proper Disclosures: Meta failed to inform users about biometric data collection, retention periods, or obtain consent before scanning facial features

Illinois’ BIPA, enacted in 2008, remains the nation’s strictest biometric privacy law and uniquely allows individuals to sue companies directly without proving actual harm—a provision that fueled the Instagram settlement after the Illinois Supreme Court’s 2019 Rosenbach v. Six Flags decision.

Legal Claims and Grounds

Federal MDL Claims

The social media addiction MDL asserts multiple legal theories:

Product Liability Claims:

• Strict liability for design defects
• Failure to warn about known mental health risks
• Negligent product design

Negligence Claims:

• Negligent design and operation of addictive platforms
• Negligent concealment and misrepresentation
• Failure to protect minors from known harms

Consumer Protection Violations:

• State unfair trade practices acts
• Deceptive business practices
• False and misleading statements about platform safety

Public Nuisance Claims (School Districts):

• Creating conditions harmful to student populations
• Interfering with public health and educational systems
• Causing increased demand for mental health services

In October 2024, Judge Rogers denied Meta’s motion to dismiss most claims, ruling that allegations about platform features could proceed to trial. The court rejected Meta’s Section 230 immunity arguments and First Amendment defenses for design-related claims.

Biometric Privacy Legal Grounds

The completed Illinois settlement centered on BIPA violations:

• Illinois law (740 ILCS 14/) prohibits collecting biometric identifiers without informed written consent
• Companies must disclose collection purposes, retention periods, and destruction schedules
• BIPA allows statutory damages of $1,000-$5,000 per violation plus attorney fees
• Private right of action enables individuals to sue without government enforcement

Current Case Status and Timeline

Mental Health Addiction MDL Status (December 2025)

The litigation progresses through key procedural stages:

Case Volume: As of December 2025, 2,191 cases are consolidated in MDL-3047, representing individual victims, families, 800+ school districts, and 33 state attorneys general.

Discovery Phase: Parties are exchanging internal documents, research data, and evidence. Recent court filings revealed Meta shut down Project Mercury after internal testing showed Facebook use worsened mental health symptoms. Internal employee communications compared Meta’s practices to tobacco companies concealing product risks.

Bellwether Trial Selection: In June 2025, Judge Rogers selected eleven bellwether cases:

• Six school districts: Tucson Unified (Arizona), Harford County (Maryland), plus districts in Georgia, Kentucky, New Jersey, and South Carolina
• Five individual plaintiff cases to follow

Trial Schedule: The first bellwether trial involving school districts is scheduled for November 25, 2025, with jury selection beginning October 14, 2025. California state court trials are scheduled starting November 24, 2025, with additional trials in March and May 2026.

Recent Procedural Developments:

• November 2025: 29 state attorneys general requested consolidation of their claims into a single trial; Meta opposed, arguing state consumer protection laws differ significantly
• November 2025: Plaintiffs asked a Los Angeles court to force Meta to produce unredacted internal documents showing attorneys allegedly altered research about social media harm
• October 2024: Massachusetts lawsuit survived dismissal; judge found sufficient evidence Meta used Instagram features to addict teens while misleading the public

Biometric Privacy Settlement Status

The Illinois BIPA settlement is fully resolved:

• Final Approval: November 21, 2023
• Claims Deadline: September 27, 2023
• Payments Distributed: June 2024
• Average Payout: $32.56 per eligible claimant
• Total Beneficiaries: Approximately 4 million Illinois Instagram users

Recent Legal Developments (2024-2025)

Major Court Rulings

May 2025: Judge Rogers upheld confidentiality of therapy communications for plaintiffs in the MDL, protecting sensitive mental health records from discovery.

October 2024: Judge dismissed claims seeking to hold Mark Zuckerberg personally liable, finding insufficient evidence to establish the CEO’s individual responsibility. However, the court allowed negligence and wrongful death claims against Meta to proceed.

October 2024: Federal judge refused to dismiss Massachusetts’ lawsuit alleging Meta used Instagram features to addict teens and misled the public about mental health risks.

September 2025: 9th Circuit largely upheld California’s Protecting Our Kids from Social Media Addiction Act, allowing most provisions limiting minors’ access to addictive algorithms to take effect. The court struck down only the provision blocking “like” and share counts by default as potentially unconstitutional.

Legislative and Regulatory Developments

February 2025: Maryland enacted the nation’s first comprehensive child online safety law requiring tech platforms to limit harm to minors and banning sale of children’s data. Meta and Google immediately sued to block implementation, arguing First Amendment violations.

January 2025: White Mountain Apache Tribe filed federal lawsuit against Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, Snapchat, and YouTube, alleging platforms worsened youth mental health crisis in tribal communities with suicide rates 3.5-4 times the national average.

April 2025: Nearly 800 school districts nationwide joined the litigation, including Corpus Christi Independent School District in Texas, alleging platforms intentionally designed addictive features harming students’ development.

Notable Individual Cases

August 2024: 13-year-old girl filed proposed class action seeking $5 billion in damages, claiming Instagram provided constant streams of self-harm content causing anxiety, depression, and declining academic performance.

December 2025: Kettering, Ohio family filed claims for 16-year-old B.W., asserting Instagram and Snapchat use from 2018-2025 caused compulsive social media use, depression, anxiety, and self-harming behaviors. Claims include strict liability, negligence, and Ohio consumer protection violations.

Wrongful Death Cases: Multiple families filed lawsuits after teen suicides allegedly linked to Instagram use, including the Cusato family from New York after their 15-year-old daughter’s death.

What This Means for Consumers

For Current Instagram Users

Instagram users, particularly parents of minors, face critical decisions:

Mental Health Risks: Research cited in lawsuits indicates Instagram use correlates with increased rates of depression, anxiety, eating disorders, body dysmorphia, and self-harm among adolescents. Internal Meta documents reportedly acknowledge these connections.

Platform Changes: Meta implemented new protections in response to litigation pressure, including stricter message settings for teens, age-appropriate content filters, and enhanced parental controls. Critics argue these changes are insufficient and motivated by legal exposure rather than genuine safety concerns.

Data Privacy: While the Illinois biometric settlement is closed, Instagram still collects extensive user data. Users should review privacy settings and understand what information platforms gather.

For Potential Claimants

Eligibility for Mental Health Claims: Individuals may qualify if they:

• Used Instagram before age 21 and suffered mental health harm
• Received professional treatment for depression, anxiety, eating disorders, or self-harm linked to platform use
• Are parents or guardians of minors harmed by Instagram use
• Most states allow claims until age 20 or 21 due to minority tolling provisions

Potential Compensation: While cases are in early stages, attorneys estimate:

• Personal injury cases: Tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars
• Wrongful death cases: $900,000 to over $3 million
• School districts: Reimbursement for increased mental health services costs

How to File: Eligible individuals should contact mass tort attorneys experienced in MDL proceedings. Cases are being added to MDL-3047 throughout 2025. Statutes of limitations vary by state but generally extend for minors.

Implications for Data Privacy and Consumer Protection

The Instagram lawsuits signal heightened accountability for tech companies:

Biometric Data Regulation: The $68.5 million BIPA settlement, while smaller than Facebook’s $650 million BIPA payout, demonstrates Illinois’ law creates real financial consequences. Other states are considering similar biometric privacy legislation.

Section 230 Limits: Judge Rogers’ rulings limiting Section 230 immunity for product design claims could expose social media companies to liability for platform features, not just third-party content.

Mental Health Accountability: If plaintiffs prevail in bellwether trials, social media companies may face:

• Mandatory warning labels about mental health risks
• Required safety features for minor users
• Restrictions on addictive design elements
• Significant financial liability for documented harms

Regulatory Momentum: Federal and state regulators are investigating social media platforms for Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) violations, deceptive practices, and failure to protect minors.

How This Compares to Similar Tech Company Lawsuits

Other Meta BIPA Settlements

Instagram’s $68.5 million settlement is Meta’s second major biometric privacy payout:

• Facebook BIPA (2021): $650 million settlement, with some users receiving over $400
• Instagram’s lower per-person payout ($32.56 vs. $400+) reflects shorter violation period and different usage patterns

Social Media Addiction Litigation Landscape

Instagram is one defendant in broader litigation targeting multiple platforms:

Other MDL-3047 Defendants:

• Snap Inc. (Snapchat): Faces addiction claims plus allegations of facilitating drug sales leading to teen overdoses; October 2024 New Mexico complaint revealed internal messages showing company allegedly ignored sextortion reports
• TikTok/ByteDance: Accused of addictive algorithms and inadequate age verification
• YouTube/Google: Similar claims regarding algorithmic recommendation systems targeting minors
• Combined Strategy: 70% of MDL-3047 cases target Meta (Instagram/Facebook), but consolidation allows plaintiffs to share discovery across all defendants

Tobacco and Opioid Litigation Parallels

Plaintiffs explicitly compare Instagram addiction litigation to landmark product liability cases:

• Tobacco Litigation Model: Internal documents concealing known harms; targeting vulnerable populations (youth); addictive product design
• Opioid Analogy: Aggressive marketing to susceptible users; downplaying addiction risks; prioritizing profits over public health
• Potential Outcomes: If parallels hold, settlements could reach billions and mandate industry-wide changes

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Instagram class action lawsuit still active?

Two separate Instagram lawsuits exist with different statuses. The Illinois biometric privacy settlement is fully resolved—payments of $32.56 were distributed in June 2024, and the claims period is permanently closed. The social media addiction MDL remains highly active with 2,191 cases as of December 2025. New plaintiffs continue joining throughout 2025, and first bellwether trials begin November 2025.

Can I still join the Instagram mental health lawsuit?

Yes. MDL-3047 accepts new cases from individuals who used Instagram before age 21 and suffered mental health harm, including anxiety, depression, eating disorders, self-harm, or suicidal ideation. Parents of affected minors can also file claims. Statutes of limitations vary by state but generally extend for minors, giving attorneys time to build strong cases. Contact mass tort attorneys specializing in social media addiction litigation for case evaluation.

How much money could Instagram lawsuits pay?

Compensation varies significantly by case type. The completed Illinois biometric settlement paid $32.56 per claimant. For ongoing mental health litigation, attorneys estimate personal injury cases could recover tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars, while wrongful death cases may reach $900,000 to over $3 million. School districts seek reimbursement for increased mental health services costs. Final values depend on bellwether trial outcomes and potential settlements, which won’t be determined until 2026 or later.

What are the main allegations in the Instagram addiction lawsuit?

Plaintiffs claim Meta intentionally designed Instagram with addictive features—infinite scroll, autoplay videos, algorithmic content feeds, push notifications, and visible “like” counts—knowing these mechanisms harm adolescent mental health. Internal company documents allegedly reveal Meta viewed youth susceptibility to addiction as a profit opportunity and suppressed research showing Instagram use causes depression, anxiety, body dysmorphia, eating disorders, self-harm, and suicidal ideation. Lawsuits assert Meta failed to warn users or implement meaningful protections despite documented risks.

When will the Instagram lawsuit trials begin?

The first bellwether trial in federal MDL-3047 is scheduled for November 25, 2025, involving school district claims. Jury selection begins October 14, 2025. Five individual plaintiff cases will be tried after school district cases conclude. California state court trials are scheduled for November 24, 2025, March 9, 2026, and May 11, 2026. These initial trials will establish precedents and likely influence settlement negotiations for remaining cases. Final resolution of all claims may take years.

Who is eligible to file an Instagram lawsuit?

Eligible individuals include young adults who used Instagram before age 21 and received professional treatment for mental health conditions linked to platform use, such as depression, anxiety, eating disorders, body dysmorphia, self-harm, or suicidal ideation. Parents and legal guardians of minors harmed by Instagram can sue on their behalf. School districts experiencing increased mental health services costs due to social media-related issues are also filing institutional claims. Most states allow minors’ claims until age 20 or 21 under minority tolling provisions.

What happens next in the Instagram litigation?

Through late 2025, discovery continues as plaintiffs and Meta exchange internal documents, research data, and expert testimony. Bellwether trials begin November 2025, testing plaintiff theories and establishing damage ranges. Trial outcomes will heavily influence settlement negotiations in 2026 and beyond. If juries find Meta liable and award substantial damages, pressure will mount for global settlement resolving all 2,191+ pending cases. Meta continues defending claims by invoking Section 230 immunity and First Amendment protections, though Judge Rogers has limited these defenses for design-related allegations.

Legal Disclaimer: This article provides general information about Instagram class action lawsuits for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe you or your child has been harmed by Instagram use, consult with qualified mass tort attorneys experienced in social media addiction litigation to evaluate your specific circumstances and legal options.

Sources: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (MDL No. 3047), Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (740 ILCS 14/), court filings in Parris v. Meta Platforms Inc., judicial opinions from Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, verified legal news sources including court records and official statements.

About the Author

Sarah Klein, JD, is a licensed attorney and legal content strategist with over 12 years of experience across civil, criminal, family, and regulatory law. At All About Lawyer, she covers a wide range of legal topics — from high-profile lawsuits and courtroom stories to state traffic laws and everyday legal questions — all with a focus on accuracy, clarity, and public understanding.
Her writing blends real legal insight with plain-English explanations, helping readers stay informed and legally aware.
Read more about Sarah