Grammarly Class Action, AI Tool Accused of Using Writers’ Identities

A proposed class action lawsuit filed in March 2026 alleges Grammarly used writers’ names and identities in its AI “Expert Review” tool without consent. The complaint claims the feature misrepresented AI-generated feedback as coming from real experts. The case is active in federal court with no settlement.

Quick Facts Table

Field	Detail
Case Name	Angwin v. Superhuman Platform, Inc.
Court	U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Date Filed	March 11, 2026
Defendant	Superhuman Platform, Inc. (parent company of Grammarly)
Lead Plaintiff	Julia Angwin
Alleged Violation	Misappropriation of identity; violation of publicity and privacy rights
Products / Services Affected	Grammarly “Expert Review” AI feature
Geographic Scope	Nationwide (U.S.)
Settlement	None — litigation phase only
Claim Form Available	No
Plaintiffs’ Attorneys	TBD

What Happened in the Grammarly AI Lawsuit?

Grammarly is a widely used writing assistant that offers grammar correction and AI-powered editing tools. In 2025, the company introduced a feature called “Expert Review,” which provided feedback styled after well-known writers and professionals.

According to reports, the tool generated editing suggestions that appeared to come from real journalists, authors, and academics. The lawsuit claims these individuals never gave permission for their names or identities to be used.

Journalist Julia Angwin filed the class action in March 2026, alleging the feature misled users and improperly used real people’s identities in a commercial product.

What Does the Grammarly Lawsuit Allege?

The complaint alleges Grammarly’s AI tool misappropriated the names, likenesses, and identities of writers and public figures. According to the complaint, the feature presented AI-generated feedback as if it came from those individuals.

Plaintiffs claim this practice created false impressions of endorsement or participation. The lawsuit alleges Grammarly used these identities to increase the perceived value of its subscription-based service.

The complaint also alleges the conduct violated individuals’ rights by commercially exploiting their reputations without consent. Plaintiffs claim this caused economic and reputational harm.

Related article: Huggies Class Action, Parents Say “Hypoallergenic” Diapers Caused Skin Reactions 

What Laws Were Allegedly Violated in the Grammarly Lawsuit?

• Right of publicity laws (state privacy and publicity statutes)
  These laws protect individuals from unauthorized commercial use of their name or likeness.
• False endorsement under federal law (Lanham Act)
  This prohibits misleading consumers into believing a person endorses a product.
• Unfair and deceptive practices laws
  These laws prevent businesses from misleading consumers in ways that cause harm.

Who Is Affected by the Grammarly AI Lawsuit?

You may be affected if…

• You are a writer, journalist, or professional whose name appeared in Grammarly’s AI tool
• You did not give permission for your identity or style to be used
• You were included as an “expert” in the Expert Review feature
• You are located in the United States

No action is required right now. Save any relevant records or communications — these may matter if a settlement is reached.

What Is Grammarly Saying About the Lawsuit?

Grammarly’s parent company, Superhuman, has stated it believes the claims lack merit and plans to defend the case. 

The company also disabled the “Expert Review” feature following backlash and legal scrutiny. 

Grammarly has indicated it plans to redesign the feature with clearer consent and control mechanisms for individuals.

What Happens Next in the Grammarly Class Action?

• The defendant may file a motion to dismiss the complaint
• Both sides may exchange evidence during discovery
• The court may decide whether to certify a class of affected individuals
• The parties may enter settlement discussions
• If unresolved, the case may proceed to trial

This page will be updated as the case develops.

Important Case Dates

Milestone	Date
Lawsuit Filed	March 11, 2026
Defendant Answer Due	TBD
Discovery Period	TBD
Class Certification Hearing	TBD
Trial Date (if set)	TBD
Settlement (if reached)	TBD

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Grammarly lawsuit real or legitimate?

Yes. A class action lawsuit has been filed alleging Grammarly used writers’ identities without consent. The claims remain allegations, and no court ruling has been issued.

Can I file a claim against Grammarly right now?

No. The case is still in early stages. No settlement exists, and no claim form is available.

Do I need a lawyer to join the Grammarly class action?

No. If the court certifies the class, eligible individuals may be included automatically unless they opt out.

What happens if the Grammarly lawsuit settles?

If a settlement occurs, affected individuals may receive compensation or other relief. The court must approve any settlement before benefits are distributed.

Will I get notified if there is a settlement?

Yes. Notices are typically sent through email, mail, or public announcements if a settlement is approved.

What is the “Expert Review” feature in Grammarly?

It was an AI tool that generated editing suggestions styled after well-known writers and experts, even though those individuals were not involved.

Did Grammarly remove the AI feature?

Yes. The company disabled the feature after backlash and legal action related to the lawsuit.

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Legal claims and outcomes depend on specific facts and applicable law. For advice regarding a particular situation, consult a qualified attorney.