Federal Law Wins When a State Law Conflicts With Federal Law?But 3 Exceptions Let States Fight Back When Laws Clash
When state law conflicts with federal law, the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution makes federal law supreme—meaning federal law generally wins and the conflicting state law is invalid. However, the outcome depends on whether federal law actually “preempts” state law, which isn’t automatic. Courts must analyze whether Congress intended to replace state law, whether the federal regulation is comprehensive enough to occupy the entire field, or whether it’s genuinely impossible to follow both laws simultaneously.
The 2025-2026 Supreme Court term is already testing these boundaries with cases involving environmental regulation, gun control, voting rights, and transgender sports bans—all raising fundamental questions about where federal authority ends and state power begins. In Chevron USA v. Plaquemines Parish, argued in early 2026, the Court will decide whether oil companies can escape state environmental lawsuits by claiming federal contractor status. Meanwhile, West Virginia v. B.P.J. forces justices to determine if federal Title IX law preempts state laws banning transgender athletes from girls’ sports teams.
This affects you if you’re confused about which law to follow when state and federal rules seem to contradict each other, if you’re facing prosecution under a state law you believe conflicts with federal law, or if you’re wondering why marijuana is illegal federally but legal in your state. Understanding how these conflicts are resolved determines which laws you must obey and which rights you can enforce.
The Supremacy Clause: Why Federal Law Is “Supreme Law of the Land”
What Article VI of the Constitution Actually Says
Article VI, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution states: “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof…shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”
In plain English: The U.S. Constitution, federal statutes passed by Congress, treaties ratified by the Senate, and federal regulations from executive agencies are the highest law. State laws that conflict with valid federal law are invalid and cannot be enforced.
The Founders included this clause to prevent chaos. Under the Articles of Confederation (1781-1789), states routinely ignored federal treaties and passed conflicting laws, undermining the national government’s authority. British diplomats complained that states violated the Treaty of Peace after the Revolutionary War, excusing Britain’s refusal to withdraw troops.
The Supremacy Clause solved this problem by establishing that federal law prevails in conflicts.
What “Supreme Law of the Land” Includes
The Supremacy Clause covers:
- The Constitution itself: State laws violating constitutional rights are invalid
- Federal statutes: Laws passed by Congress under its constitutional powers
- Treaties: International agreements ratified with Senate approval
- Federal regulations: Rules created by executive agencies like the EPA, FDA, or OSHA implementing federal statutes
State constitutions, state statutes, state regulations, and even state court rulings must yield to these federal sources when there’s a true conflict.
How This Fits Into Federalism
The Supremacy Clause doesn’t give the federal government unlimited power. Federalism—the division of power between national and state governments—remains the foundation of American government.
The Tenth Amendment reserves to states all powers not delegated to the federal government. States retain broad authority over local matters like education, family law, property, criminal law, professional licensing, and most contracts.
The Supremacy Clause only comes into play when both federal and state governments have acted in the same area and their laws conflict.
When and How Federal Law Wins Through Preemption
Express Preemption: Congress Explicitly Says Federal Law Replaces State Law
Express preemption occurs when Congress includes language in a statute explicitly stating that federal law replaces state law in a specific area.
Examples:
- ERISA (Employee Retirement Income Security Act): Federal employee benefits law preempts state laws “relating to” employee benefit plans, creating uniform national standards
- Airline Deregulation Act: Federal aviation law preempts state regulation of airline routes and services
- Federal banking laws: Preempt many state banking regulations to ensure consistent national banking standards
Courts interpret express preemption clauses carefully. When language is ambiguous, courts presume in favor of preserving state authority in areas traditionally regulated by states.
Implied Preemption Through Field Occupation
Field preemption occurs when federal regulation is so comprehensive that Congress has “occupied the field,” leaving no room for state law even without explicit preemption language.
Courts infer field preemption when federal law is pervasive or when the federal interest is so dominant that the entire regulatory scheme must be federal.
Examples:
- Immigration law: Federal government has exclusive power over immigration status, visa requirements, and deportation. States cannot create their own immigration enforcement schemes. Arizona v. United States (2012) struck down parts of Arizona’s immigration law for conflicting with federal authority
- Foreign affairs: Federal government exclusively handles treaties and diplomatic relations
- Nuclear energy regulation: Federal law comprehensively regulates nuclear safety, leaving no room for state regulation in that specific field
Conflict Preemption: Impossible to Follow Both Laws
Conflict preemption occurs in two scenarios:
Impossibility preemption: You cannot physically comply with both federal and state law simultaneously. Example: Federal law requires X, but state law prohibits X.
Obstacle preemption: State law stands as an obstacle to accomplishing federal objectives, frustrating the purpose of federal law even if technical compliance with both is possible.
In Crosby v. National Foreign Trade Council (2000), the Supreme Court struck down a Massachusetts law restricting state contracts with companies doing business in Burma. While not directly contradicting federal sanctions law, the state law interfered with the President’s diplomatic flexibility, frustrating federal foreign policy objectives.
When State Law Can Stand Despite Federal Law
No Actual Conflict Exists
Most of the time, federal and state law coexist without conflict. Both laws apply in their respective spheres. You must follow both.
Example: Federal tax law and state tax law both apply. Filing federal taxes doesn’t exempt you from state taxes. No conflict exists—you simply comply with both.
States Can Provide More Protection Than Federal Minimums
Federal law often sets a floor, not a ceiling. States can adopt stricter standards that provide greater protections.
Environmental regulation: The Clean Air Act allows states to adopt stricter emissions standards than federal EPA minimums. California’s emissions standards are stricter than federal law, and other states can adopt California’s standards. States cannot go below federal minimums, but they can exceed them.
Worker safety: Federal OSHA regulations set minimum workplace safety standards. States can require additional safety measures beyond federal requirements.
Consumer protection: States can provide greater consumer protections than federal consumer protection laws.
Employment law: Federal minimum wage is $7.25/hour. States like California ($16/hour) and Washington ($16.28/hour) set higher minimums. States cannot go below the federal floor.
Areas of Traditional State Authority
Courts presume against preemption in areas historically regulated by states. The burden is on the party claiming preemption to prove Congress intended to displace state law.
Traditional state police powers include health, safety, morals, and general welfare. Courts are reluctant to find preemption unless Congressional intent is clear.
Cooperative Federalism: Federal Law Invites State Participation
Many federal statutes explicitly invite states to implement federal programs or add requirements. This “cooperative federalism” allows states to administer federal law while adding state-specific provisions.
Examples:
- Environmental laws often give states primary enforcement authority
- Medicaid is jointly administered by federal and state governments
- Unemployment insurance combines federal standards with state administration
Real-World Examples: Where Federal and State Laws Clash
Marijuana Legalization
The federal Controlled Substances Act classifies marijuana as an illegal Schedule I drug. Possessing, growing, or selling marijuana violates federal law nationwide.
Yet 38 states have legalized medical marijuana, and 24 states have legalized recreational marijuana as of January 2026.
Who wins? Technically, federal law wins. The federal government could prosecute anyone violating the Controlled Substances Act, even in states where marijuana is legal.
Reality: The federal government has chosen not to enforce federal marijuana laws in states with legalization, creating a gray area. Individuals can still be prosecuted under federal law, though it’s rare. Banks often refuse to serve marijuana businesses because marijuana remains federally illegal.
Immigration Enforcement
Federal law exclusively governs immigration status and enforcement. States cannot create their own immigration systems.
In Arizona v. United States (2012), the Supreme Court struck down most of Arizona’s SB 1070, which attempted to make state crimes out of immigration violations. The Court held federal law preempts state immigration enforcement schemes that conflict with federal policy.
Sanctuary cities: Some states and cities limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement. This is generally legal under the anti-commandeering doctrine—states cannot be forced to enforce federal law, but they cannot obstruct federal enforcement either.
Environmental Regulation and Climate Change
The Chevron USA v. Plaquemines Parish case being argued before the Supreme Court in 2026 involves Louisiana parishes suing oil companies for environmental damage under state law.
Chevron argues the cases belong in federal court because federal contractor status during World War II creates federal jurisdiction. Louisiana argues these are state law environmental claims that belong in state court.
The outcome will determine whether states can hold corporations accountable under state environmental laws or whether federal law shields them.
What You Must Know About Resolving Conflicts
How Courts Decide Which Law Applies
The judicial process:
Someone challenges a state law as conflicting with federal law. The case goes to state or federal court. Courts apply Supremacy Clause analysis to determine if federal law preempts state law. If preempted, the state law is struck down or cannot be enforced.
What judges examine:
- Text of the federal statute to see if Congress intended preemption
- Legislative history and Congressional intent
- Whether federal and state law can coexist without actual conflict
- Whether state law frustrates federal objectives
- Traditional state powers and presumption against preemption in areas of historic state authority
Supreme Court as final arbiter: The U.S. Supreme Court has final say on whether federal law preempts state law. Major cases like Arizona v. United States, Crosby v. National Foreign Trade Council, and Geier v. American Honda Motor Co. established preemption standards.
Burden on challenger: The party claiming preemption must prove it. Courts presume against preemption in areas traditionally regulated by states like health and safety.
The Federal System Divides Power Between Governments
Federalism means power is divided between national and state governments. You’re subject to both federal and state law in most situations.
The Tenth Amendment reserves to states all powers not delegated to the federal government. States have broad authority over local matters.
States serve as “laboratories of democracy,” testing different policies. When they conflict with federal law, federal law controls. But in their respective spheres, both federal and state law usually apply.
Understanding which government has authority helps you know which law applies. You can challenge laws in court if you believe state law violates federal law or vice versa.
Recent Supreme Court Developments
The 2025-2026 term features multiple federal-state conflicts:
West Virginia v. B.P.J. (argued December 2025): Does West Virginia’s categorical ban on transgender girls in women’s sports violate federal Title IX, which prohibits sex discrimination in education? The Court must determine if federal anti-discrimination law preempts state sports eligibility laws.
Chevron USA v. Plaquemines Parish (2026 term): Can oil companies avoid state environmental lawsuits by claiming federal jurisdiction based on WWII-era federal contracts? This tests whether federal contractor status shields companies from state accountability.
Louisiana v. Callais (reargued October 2025): Challenges the creation of a second majority-minority congressional district under the Voting Rights Act, testing federal voting rights law against state redistricting authority.
What to Do If You’re Caught Between Conflicting Laws
Determine Which Law Actually Applies
Research your situation: Not every difference between federal and state law is a conflict. Often both apply.
Consult an attorney: Constitutional and administrative law attorneys specialize in federal-state conflicts. They can analyze whether federal law preempts state law in your situation.
Understand your obligations: You must follow federal law when there’s a true conflict. State officials cannot enforce state laws that conflict with valid federal law.
Don’t assume invalidity: Just because federal law exists doesn’t mean state law is automatically invalid. Analyze whether actual preemption applies.
Protecting Your Rights
If state enforces conflicting law: You can raise preemption as a defense in court. You may file a lawsuit challenging the state law as unconstitutional under the Supremacy Clause. Document how the state law prevents you from complying with federal law or vice versa.
If federal law exceeds authority: You can challenge federal law as beyond Congress’s enumerated powers. Argue federal law violates the Tenth Amendment or other constitutional limits. States can file lawsuits challenging federal overreach.
Where to get help:
- Constitutional law attorneys
- Civil rights organizations like the ACLU
- State attorney general offices that challenge federal laws
- Federal public defenders if facing federal charges
- Legal aid for low-income individuals
- Law school clinics specializing in constitutional law
Finding Reliable Information
Constitutional resources:
- U.S. Constitution text at constitution.congress.gov
- Supreme Court decisions at supremecourt.gov, FindLaw, Justia, SCOTUSblog
- Cornell Legal Information Institute for case law
Government resources:
- Congressional Research Service reports on federalism and preemption
- Federal agency preemption guidance (FDA, EPA, DOT publish preemption policies)
- State attorney general opinions on federal-state conflicts
- USA.gov for federal law, state government websites for state law
Legal analysis:
- American Bar Association constitutional law resources
- Law review articles on federalism
- Federal court system information at uscourts.gov
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Supremacy Clause?
The Supremacy Clause is Article VI, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution, which establishes that the Constitution, federal laws, and treaties are the “supreme Law of the Land.” When state law conflicts with valid federal law, federal law prevails and the conflicting state law cannot be enforced.
Which law wins when state and federal laws conflict?
Federal law generally wins when there’s a true conflict with state law, under the Supremacy Clause. However, not every difference is a conflict. State law can stand if there’s no actual conflict, if states are providing more protection than federal minimums, or if federal law hasn’t occupied the field.
Can states ignore federal law?
No. States cannot pass laws that directly contradict valid federal law. However, states cannot be forced to enforce federal law (anti-commandeering doctrine). States can refuse to cooperate with federal enforcement but cannot actively obstruct it. Sanctuary city policies limiting cooperation with federal immigration enforcement are generally legal.
What are examples of conflicts between state and federal law?
Marijuana legalization (federal law bans it, many states legalized it), immigration enforcement (Arizona’s SB 1070 conflicted with federal immigration law), same-sex marriage before Obergefell v. Hodges (some states banned it while federal government recognized it), and environmental regulation (states sometimes adopt stricter standards than federal EPA requirements).
When can state law be stricter than federal law?
State law can exceed federal standards when federal law sets a minimum floor rather than a ceiling. Examples include environmental protections, worker safety regulations, minimum wage laws, and consumer protections. States cannot go below federal minimums but can provide greater protections.
What happens if I follow state law but violate federal law?
You can still be prosecuted under federal law even if you complied with state law. Federal law enforcement can charge you with federal crimes regardless of state legalization. Example: Marijuana businesses operate legally under state law but technically violate federal law and risk federal prosecution.
How do courts decide which law applies?
Courts apply Supremacy Clause analysis examining whether Congress intended preemption, whether federal regulation is comprehensive enough to occupy the field, whether actual conflict exists, and whether state law frustrates federal objectives. The Supreme Court has final say. The party claiming preemption bears the burden of proof.
PRO TIP: If you’re facing legal issues where state and federal law seem to conflict, document everything and consult a constitutional law attorney immediately. The analysis is highly fact-specific. Don’t assume a state law is invalid just because federal law exists—courts presume state law is valid in areas of traditional state authority unless preemption is clear.
Last Updated: January 14, 2026 — We keep this current with the latest legal developments.
Disclaimer: This article provides general information about what happens when state law conflicts with federal law based on constitutional text, Supreme Court precedents, and legal scholarship. It is not legal advice. Constitutional law is complex and highly fact-specific. Preemption analysis depends on the specific federal and state laws involved and the circumstances of each case. AllAboutLawyer.com does not provide legal services. If you have specific legal questions about federal-state conflicts affecting your situation, consult a qualified attorney experienced in constitutional or administrative law.
Stay informed, stay protected. — AllAboutLawyer.com
About the Author
Sarah Klein, JD, is a licensed attorney and legal content strategist with over 12 years of experience across civil, criminal, family, and regulatory law. At All About Lawyer, she covers a wide range of legal topics — from high-profile lawsuits and courtroom stories to state traffic laws and everyday legal questions — all with a focus on accuracy, clarity, and public understanding.
Her writing blends real legal insight with plain-English explanations, helping readers stay informed and legally aware.
Read more about Sarah