Edmonds School District PFAS Lawsuit, Forever Chemicals Found in a School’s Stormwater Could Reach Your Tap

The Olympic View Water and Sewer District filed a federal citizen suit against the Edmonds School District to protect the Deer Creek drinking water aquifer from PFAS contamination originating at the Madrona K-8 School site. The lawsuit was filed July 25, 2025 in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington. The district’s stormwater system allegedly drains cancer-linked “forever chemicals” directly into underground injection wells above the aquifer that supplies drinking water to thousands of Edmonds-area residents. No settlement has been reached as of March 12, 2026.

Quick Facts

What Actually Happened?

The Madrona School Replacement Project was completed by the Edmonds School District in and around 2018. It included the installation of a new stormwater management system, which collects water at catch basins and then conveys that stormwater to 16 onsite underground injection control wells. The Olympic View Water and Sewer District opposed the installation of those wells because Madrona’s stormwater drains into the ground directly above the Deer Creek aquifer.

In fall 2022, the water district tested water at Madrona School and found high levels of PFAS. The school district then conducted voluntary sampling the following year, which also revealed PFAS present. In 2024, the school submitted an investigation work plan to the state Department of Ecology. Since then, the state department issued three corrective action request letters to the school district, recommending soil removal and replacement.

The Olympic View Water and Sewer District sent a letter on May 20, 2025 to District Superintendent Rebecca Miner, citing violations of the Safe Drinking Water Act and giving the school district 60 days to comply before a formal lawsuit would follow. The school district did not achieve compliance within that window. The citizen suit was filed July 25, 2025 in federal court in Seattle.

What Does the Lawsuit Allege?

The lawsuit states the school district is violating the Safe Drinking Water Act each and every day it discharges PFAS-contaminated stormwater via the underground injection control wells at Madrona K-8 at concentrations that may violate groundwater quality standards. In plain English — the complaint alleges that every time it rains, cancer-linked chemicals wash from the school grounds into underground wells and seep toward the community’s primary drinking water source.

PFAS have been detected in stormwater and soils at the school site. These substances pose a risk to groundwater quality due to their persistence in the environment and links to health concerns such as cancer, developmental harm, and immune system impacts. Despite multiple opportunities, the Edmonds School District has not taken adequate steps to stop PFAS-contaminated stormwater from being discharged into underground injection wells located above the aquifer.

OVWSD General Manager Bob Danson stated: “The Edmonds School District has known about the PFAS issue at Madrona School since 2023 but has failed to take adequate measures to prevent these contaminants from entering the school’s UIC wells. Our efforts to work collaboratively with the district were met with continued resistance, leaving us no choice but to pursue legal action to protect the public’s drinking water.”

What Are PFAS — and Why Do They Matter?

PFAS stands for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances — a group of more than 12,000 man-made chemicals used since the 1940s in products like nonstick cookware, waterproof clothing, firefighting foam, and food packaging. Scientists and regulators call them “forever chemicals” because they do not break down in the environment or in the human body.

PFAS have been found to be a health risk for immune issues, cancer risks, and other health issues, creating a personal health risk to the community. The EPA established the first-ever federal drinking water limit for PFAS in April 2024, setting the maximum contaminant level at 4 parts per trillion for the two most common types — PFOA and PFOS.

OVWSD officials have said the community’s water is currently treated, tested, and safe to drink — but they are concerned this issue could become more serious in the future. If the aquifer becomes contaminated, the water district warns it could either require expensive treatment or lose that water source entirely.

What Laws Were Allegedly Violated?

• Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 (SDWA), 42 U.S.C. § 300h — Federal law prohibiting the underground injection of any contaminant that endangers a drinking water source. The complaint alleges the school district’s 16 underground injection wells at Madrona K-8 violate this law each time it rains and PFAS-contaminated stormwater drains into them.
• EPA Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program — Federal regulatory program established under the SDWA that governs what can be injected underground near drinking water sources. The complaint alleges the school district’s wells discharge pollutants in violation of UIC program requirements.
• Washington State Underground Injection Control Program (WAC 173-218) — State-level rules mirroring and extending federal UIC requirements. The complaint alleges the school district violated state groundwater quality standards through its ongoing stormwater discharge practices.
• Citizen Suit Provision, SDWA § 1449 — Federal law allowing water districts, organizations, and individuals to sue directly for enforcement of the Safe Drinking Water Act when they believe a government agency is failing to act. This provision is why Olympic View — not a federal agency — has the legal standing to bring this lawsuit directly.

Who Does This Lawsuit Affect?

• You may be affected if you receive drinking water from the Olympic View Water and Sewer District, which serves homes and businesses in Edmonds, Woodway, and parts of unincorporated Snohomish County.
• You may be affected if your child attends or attended Madrona K-8 School and you are concerned about their potential exposure to PFAS in the school’s soil or stormwater environment.
• You may be affected if you live near the Deer Creek aquifer and rely on well water rather than municipal supply — private well owners are not covered by municipal water testing and should consider independent testing.
• You may be affected if you are a resident of any Washington community that relies on an aquifer near a school or development site that uses underground injection wells for stormwater management.

No action is required right now on the lawsuit itself. However, if you have concerns about your personal drinking water, contact Olympic View Water and Sewer District directly or request current water quality reports at your address. OVWSD’s treated drinking water has tested safe as of March 12, 2026.

This case is separate from the Edmonds School District diploma lawsuit filed by the family of Makena Simonsen — a Lynnwood High graduate who alleges the district gave her a meaningless diploma that cut her off from free transition services. Both cases name the same defendant.

What Is the Edmonds School District Saying?

Edmonds School District spokesperson Amanda Ralston said: “The Edmonds School District disagrees with the allegations outlined in the citizen suit, including any assertion that the District is in violation of clean water standards and that the actions taken by the District to identify and assess PFAS at the Madrona K-8 school are inadequate.”

Ralston said although some water samples taken from Madrona showed elevated levels of PFAS, no samples show any impact on groundwater, let alone drinking water sources. “The District has been actively addressing the PFAS concerns under the supervision of the Department of Ecology,” she said. “The District is in full compliance with its stormwater permit and has been addressing PFAS at the Madrona School consistent with the direction provided by the Department of Ecology.”

The school district also said it retained a contractor to replace the bioretention planter strips in the bus loop and parking areas at Madrona — identified as the likely source of PFAS contamination introduced during school construction — with the project scheduled for completion before the start of the 2025–2026 school year.

What Happens Next?

• The district’s remediation project may not end the lawsuit. The school district claims it replaced the contaminated soil before the 2025–2026 school year. However, the lawsuit alleges violations are ongoing — meaning the court must determine whether the remediation was sufficient to bring the district into compliance with the Safe Drinking Water Act.
• Civil penalties are on the table. The plaintiffs seek a declaration of legal rights, regulatory enforcement, and civil penalties. Under the Safe Drinking Water Act’s citizen suit provision, civil penalties can reach $25,000 per day per violation — and the complaint alleges violations have continued every day it has rained since at least 2022.
• The Western District court will set a schedule. The parties will enter the standard federal court process: initial disclosures, discovery, and potentially expert testimony on groundwater contamination science. Cases involving environmental science typically take 18 to 36 months to reach trial.
• State regulators remain involved. The Washington Department of Ecology retains independent oversight of the site. Its corrective action letters are separate from the federal lawsuit — meaning the district faces regulatory pressure on two fronts simultaneously.
• The aquifer remains safe for now. OVWSD has confirmed current drinking water meets all safety standards. The lawsuit’s purpose is to prevent future contamination — not to address a current public health emergency.

This page will be updated as the case develops.

Important Case Dates

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Edmonds School District PFAS lawsuit real? 

Yes. Olympic View Water and Sewer District v. Edmonds School District No. 15 (Case No. 2:2025cv01409) is an active federal lawsuit filed July 25, 2025 in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington in Seattle. The docket is publicly available through PACER. No settlement has been reached and no claim form exists.

Is the drinking water in Edmonds safe right now? 

Yes, according to Olympic View Water and Sewer District. OVWSD has stated repeatedly that its treated municipal drinking water is currently safe and fully compliant with all state and federal standards. The lawsuit’s goal is to prevent future contamination of the Deer Creek aquifer — not to address a current emergency. If you have concerns, request a water quality report directly from OVWSD.

What exactly is a citizen suit — and how can a water district sue a school? 

A citizen suit is a legal tool built into federal environmental laws like the Safe Drinking Water Act. It allows individuals, organizations, and water districts — not just government agencies — to sue directly for enforcement of environmental laws when they believe a violation is ongoing. Olympic View does not need a government agency’s permission to file this case.

What are PFAS and should I be worried about them? 

PFAS are man-made chemicals used in thousands of products since the 1940s. They are called “forever chemicals” because they do not break down in the body or environment. Long-term exposure has been linked to cancer, immune system disruption, developmental delays, and increased cholesterol. The EPA set a federal drinking water limit for the first time in April 2024. Current Edmonds municipal water meets that standard, according to OVWSD testing.

Did the school district actually fix the problem? 

The school district says it replaced contaminated soil in the bus loop and parking areas at Madrona before the 2025–2026 school year, under direction from the Washington Department of Ecology. The lawsuit argues that remediation alone may not be enough to demonstrate full compliance with the Safe Drinking Water Act’s underground injection standards. The federal court will determine whether the district’s actions were legally sufficient.

Are children at Madrona K-8 School at risk from PFAS exposure? 

The contamination identified in this case involves soil and stormwater at the Madrona campus — not the school’s drinking water supply. The district has stated it identified PFAS in bioretention planter strips near the bus loop and parking areas and removed the contaminated soil. There is no current indication of PFAS in indoor water at the school. Parents with specific concerns should contact the Edmonds School District or the Washington Department of Ecology directly.

Is this the only active lawsuit against the Edmonds School District right now? 

No. The Edmonds School District also faces a separate active lawsuit — Simonsen v. Edmonds School District — filed July 28, 2025 in Snohomish County Superior Court. In that case, a Lynnwood High School graduate with disabilities alleges the district gave her a 3.87 GPA diploma she was not academically equipped to earn, then used that diploma to deny her access to free post-graduation transition services worth more than $160,000. The two lawsuits are completely separate and involve different legal claims.

Could this case result in fines against the school district? 

Yes, potentially significant ones. The Safe Drinking Water Act’s citizen suit provision allows courts to impose civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day for each day of violation. The complaint alleges PFAS-contaminated stormwater has been discharged through the underground injection wells continuously since at least 2022. The actual penalty, if any, would be determined by the court based on the facts proven at trial.

Sources & References

• Olympic View Water and Sewer District v. Edmonds School District No. 15, Case No. 2:2025cv01409 — Justia Federal Dockets (Official federal court docket — primary source)
• EPA Safe Drinking Water Act — Underground Injection Control Program (Official government source)

Last Updated: March 12, 2026

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Legal claims and outcomes depend on specific facts and applicable law. For advice regarding a particular situation, consult a qualified attorney.

About the Author

Sarah Klein, JD, is a licensed attorney and legal content strategist with over 12 years of experience across civil, criminal, family, and regulatory law. At All About Lawyer, she covers a wide range of legal topics — from high-profile lawsuits and courtroom stories to state traffic laws and everyday legal questions — all with a focus on accuracy, clarity, and public understanding.
Her writing blends real legal insight with plain-English explanations, helping readers stay informed and legally aware.
Read more about Sarah