Dooney & Bourke Accused of Flooding Inboxes With Deceptive Promotional Emails
Dooney & Bourke just got hit with a class action claiming the luxury handbag brand misled customers with fake urgency emails. The lawsuit says the company sent repeated “last chance” and “hours left” promotional emails that weren’t actually time-limited—violating Washington state law against deceptive email marketing. The case was recently moved to federal court in January 2026 and is still in its early stages.
Here’s what’s happening and what you need to know if you got these emails.
What’s the Lawsuit Actually About?
The class action accuses Dooney & Bourke of violating Washington’s Commercial Electronic Mail Act by using misleading subject lines.
According to reports from Law360, the lawsuit alleges Dooney & Bourke “violated a Washington State law by sending email blasts offering repeated ‘last chance’ sales with just ‘hours left’ for consumers to purchase advertised products.” BakeryAndSnacks.com
The problem? Those “last chance” offers weren’t actually ending. The same sales kept running day after day, making the urgency completely fake.
The case was recently removed to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington. As of January 2026, the lawsuit is pending with no settlement announced.
How These Emails Allegedly Fooled Customers
Email subject lines drive purchasing decisions.
When you see “Last Chance! Sale Ends Tonight” in your inbox, you think you need to act fast or miss out. That sense of urgency pushes you to buy now instead of waiting.
But if the “tonight” deadline is fake and the sale continues tomorrow—and the next day—that’s deceptive marketing.
The lawsuit claims Dooney & Bourke repeatedly used this tactic. Customers received multiple emails creating false deadlines that never actually arrived.
This pattern mirrors similar cases against other retailers. Crocs faced a similar lawsuit in December 2025 after sending emails with subject lines like “Today Only! EXTRA 50% off select styles,” then sending the same offer on subsequent days.
These aren’t isolated incidents. They’re part of a growing wave of email marketing class actions targeting retailers for misleading promotional tactics.
What Is Washington’s Commercial Electronic Mail Act?
Washington’s CEMA prohibits sending commercial emails with false or misleading information in the subject line.
In April 2025, the Washington State Supreme Court clarified the law’s scope in Brown v. Old Navy LLC, finding that retailers violated CEMA by “sending promotional emails with subject lines indicating that a promotion would end on a specific date, when in fact the promotion continued beyond that date.”
That ruling opened the floodgates. Since the Brown decision, at least 20 new class actions have been filed against major retailers for similar email practices.
CEMA allows consumers to sue for statutory damages—meaning you don’t need to prove actual financial harm. If the company violated the law, you can recover a set amount per email.
The law also prohibits mere “puffery”—marketing hyperbole like “Amazing deals!” But concrete factual claims about deadlines, quantities, or availability must be truthful.
What Legal Claims Are Being Made?
The Dooney & Bourke lawsuit alleges violations of CEMA and Washington’s Consumer Protection Act.
CEMA violations carry statutory damages, which can add up fast when retailers send thousands or millions of emails.
Washington’s Consumer Protection Act prohibits unfair or deceptive business practices. Creating false urgency to manipulate purchasing decisions falls squarely within that prohibition.
The lawsuit likely also includes claims for unjust enrichment—the legal theory that Dooney & Bourke profited from deceptive tactics without providing the fair value customers expected.
Similar cases against retailers have resulted in significant settlements. Companies want to avoid prolonged litigation, negative publicity, and the risk of per-email statutory damages multiplied across entire customer databases.
Why This Matters Beyond Dooney & Bourke
Email marketing lawsuits are exploding across the retail industry.
Since the Brown decision in April 2025, “at least 20 new putative class actions have been filed in Washington courts (many now in federal court), collectively seeking tens of millions of dollars in statutory damages.”
Retailers like Nike, Skechers, Ulta Beauty, and others face similar claims about fake deadlines and misleading urgency.
The trend reflects how consumers are pushing back against manipulative marketing. You shouldn’t need to second-guess every promotional email or wonder if the “final hours” claim is real.
This also matters if you’re looking at other deceptive advertising claims or consumer fraud lawsuits—email marketing has become a major litigation battleground.
Who Can Join This Class Action?
The proposed class likely includes anyone who received Dooney & Bourke promotional emails with misleading subject lines during the relevant time period.
Washington law requires either the sender or recipient to be in Washington state. If you live in Washington and received these emails, you’re potentially part of the class.
Even if you didn’t buy anything, you could still qualify. CEMA violations are based on receiving the deceptive emails, not whether you made a purchase.
The case hasn’t been certified as a class action yet. That’s the legal process where a judge decides if it can proceed on behalf of all affected consumers or just the individual plaintiff.
What Is the Current Status?
As of January 2026, the lawsuit is brand new.
Dooney & Bourke recently removed the case from state court to federal court, which is standard defense strategy in class actions.
No settlement exists. No claims administrator has been appointed. No deadline to submit claims.
The case will likely follow a familiar pattern: Dooney & Bourke will move to dismiss. The plaintiff will oppose. Discovery will begin if the case survives dismissal. Then comes class certification.
Many cases settle before trial. Retailers don’t want the exposure of jury verdicts that could include massive statutory damages.
What You Should Do Right Now
If you received “last chance” or time-limited promotional emails from Dooney & Bourke, save them.
Screenshot the emails showing the subject lines and dates. Check if you received multiple emails claiming the same sale was ending on different days.
Those emails are evidence. If the case moves forward and you want to participate, documentation matters.
Keep track of the case through class action tracking websites like TopClassActions.com or ClassAction.org. They post updates when settlements are reached or when courts issue major rulings.
Don’t fall for scam websites claiming to process Dooney & Bourke email claims. No legitimate settlement exists yet.
When Do You Need a Lawyer?
Most class action participants don’t hire their own attorney.
The class counsel represents everyone. If there’s a settlement, you’ll receive notice with instructions on how to file a claim.
You only need your own lawyer if you want to opt out and file your own lawsuit, or if you have unusual circumstances that don’t fit the standard class claims.
For most people, waiting for settlement information is the simplest path.
What Compensation Could You Get?
CEMA allows statutory damages per email violation.
The exact amount depends on court rulings and settlement negotiations. Past email marketing settlements have resulted in payments ranging from a few dollars to several hundred per class member, depending on claim volume and settlement size.
But no specific amounts have been announced in the Dooney & Bourke case. Everything depends on how the litigation unfolds.
What Happens Next
Expect months of legal maneuvering.
Dooney & Bourke will argue the case should be dismissed or that federal law preempts Washington’s statute. Plaintiffs will fight to keep the case alive and get it certified as a class action.
If the case survives and gets certified, settlement negotiations typically begin. Retailers don’t want years of litigation over email practices.
When a settlement is announced, affected consumers will receive notice by email or mail explaining how to submit claims.
Until then, affected customers should document their emails and monitor case developments.
Last Updated: January 27, 2026
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
If you received deceptive promotional emails from Dooney & Bourke with false urgency claims, save that documentation and monitor this case for updates. When a settlement is announced, make sure you file your claim before the deadline.
Stay informed, stay protected. — AllAboutLawyer.com
About the Author
Sarah Klein, JD, is a licensed attorney and legal content strategist with over 12 years of experience across civil, criminal, family, and regulatory law. At All About Lawyer, she covers a wide range of legal topics — from high-profile lawsuits and courtroom stories to state traffic laws and everyday legal questions — all with a focus on accuracy, clarity, and public understanding.
Her writing blends real legal insight with plain-English explanations, helping readers stay informed and legally aware.
Read more about Sarah