Corkcicle Charged You $1.50 You Never Agreed To—Now There’s a Class Action Lawsuit

A new class action lawsuit accuses Corkcicle of automatically adding a hidden “Delivery Guarantee” fee to every online purchase without customer consent. Plaintiff Anna Fischer filed the lawsuit in California federal court (Case No. 2:25-cv-10568) on December 27, 2025, claiming the popular drinkware brand charges consumers $1.50 for package protection they never authorized. The fee allegedly appears only at final checkout or in confirmation emails—too late for customers to notice before completing their purchase.

Fischer alleges violations of California’s Unfair Competition Law, Consumers Legal Remedies Act, and unjust enrichment. She demands a jury trial and seeks actual damages, injunctive relief, and compensation for all class members affected by Corkcicle’s billing practices.

What Is the Corkcicle Class Action About?

The lawsuit claims Corkcicle operates a deceptive billing scheme where every customer ordering from Corkcicle.com gets charged an extra $1.50 “Delivery Guarantee” fee without their knowledge or permission.

The allegations:

• Corkcicle automatically adds a $1.50 “Delivery Guarantee” fee to all online orders
• The fee is added without customer consent or opt-in
• Disclosure happens only at the final checkout step—or worse, only in confirmation emails after purchase
• Many customers don’t notice the charge until reviewing their credit card statements
• The fee allegedly protects against lost or damaged shipments, but customers never agreed to buy this protection
• Customers have no way to remove the fee before completing their purchase

What this fee supposedly covers: According to Corkcicle, the Delivery Guarantee protects customers if their package is lost, stolen, or damaged during shipping. If a problem occurs, customers can file a claim with Corkcicle’s third-party protection partner (likely Route or a similar service).

The problem: Customers claim they never asked for this protection and weren’t given a clear choice to decline it before checkout. This mirrors tactics used in similar hidden fee lawsuits, including the ongoing Sirius XM class action lawsuit where the satellite broadcaster allegedly hides a 21.4% music royalty fee from subscribers by advertising lower prices than actually charged.

The Reality Behind Corkcicle’s Hidden Delivery Fee Claims

BBB complaints and customer reviews confirm widespread frustration. On Trustpilot and Better Business Bureau, dozens of Corkcicle customers report identical experiences: they ordered products, never saw an option to opt-in or opt-out of shipping protection, and discovered unexpected $1.50 charges on their receipts.

One BBB complaint from April 2025: “This option was not shown in my checkout and also not there when I check their site. My receipt shows free shipping and nothing about opting in or out of delivery tracking.”

Another Trustpilot review from May 2025: “I never received my tumblers. They said I refused a $1.50 tracking opt in. I don’t recall any such option during checkout. And didn’t see this when I tried the site to check.”

What makes these complaints credible: Multiple customers report the exact same experience—a $1.50 charge they don’t remember authorizing, no visible opt-in during checkout, and Corkcicle customer service blaming them for “declining” protection they claim never appeared as an option.

The pattern matches other hidden fee cases. Just like T-Mobile’s hidden fees lawsuit where the carrier allegedly charged regulatory fees while presenting them as government taxes, Corkcicle allegedly adds charges at the last minute when customers are least likely to notice or back out of their purchase.

Case Details: Fischer v. 1300 Brookhaven LLC

Case name: Fischer, et al. v. 1300 Brookhaven LLC, et al.

Case number: 2:25-cv-10568

Court: U.S. District Court for the Central District of California

Filing date: December 27, 2025

Lead plaintiff: Anna Fischer

Defendant: 1300 Brookhaven LLC, doing business as Corkcicle

Plaintiff attorneys: Kevin J. Cole and W. Blair Castle of KJC Law Group, A.P.C.

Legal claims:

• Unjust enrichment
• Violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law (Business & Professions Code § 17200)
• Violation of California’s Consumers Legal Remedies Act (Civil Code § 1750 et seq.)

Requested relief:

• Declaratory judgment that Corkcicle’s practices are unlawful
• Injunctive relief prohibiting Corkcicle from continuing these billing practices
• Actual damages for all class members
• Consequential damages
• Restitution of all fees collected without consent
• Attorney fees and costs

Who Can Join the Corkcicle Class Action?

Settlement class definition (proposed): All persons in the United States who purchased products from Corkcicle.com and were charged a “Delivery Guarantee” or similar shipping protection fee without expressly opting into the charge.

This likely includes:

• Anyone who ordered from Corkcicle.com and got charged an extra $1.50 delivery fee
• Customers who never saw a checkbox or opt-in for shipping protection
• Buyers who discovered the fee only after completing their purchase
• Anyone charged between 2020-present (exact class period will be determined)

Estimated class size: Potentially tens of thousands of Corkcicle customers. If Corkcicle processes 200,000 online orders annually and 80% include the $1.50 fee, that’s $240,000 per year in potentially unauthorized charges. Over 5 years, that’s $1.2 million in fees customers may not have consented to.

You don’t need to file a claim yet. The lawsuit was just filed. If it achieves class certification and settles, a settlement administrator will send notice to class members and create a claims process.

What Consumer Protection Laws Apply?

California Business & Professions Code § 17200 (Unfair Competition Law): Prohibits any unlawful, unfair, or fraudulent business act or practice. Fischer claims Corkcicle’s practice of auto-adding fees without consent is both unfair and fraudulent.

California Consumers Legal Remedies Act (Civil Code § 1750 et seq.): Protects consumers from deceptive practices in the sale of goods and services. The Act specifically prohibits “representing that goods or services have sponsorship, approval, characteristics, ingredients, uses, benefits, or quantities which they do not have.”

Unjust enrichment doctrine: Requires parties who benefit at another’s expense to make restitution. Fischer argues Corkcicle was unjustly enriched by collecting millions in delivery guarantee fees from customers who never agreed to pay them.

Federal Trade Commission Act Section 5: While not explicitly cited in the complaint, the FTC has authority to prohibit unfair or deceptive acts affecting commerce. The FTC has increasingly targeted “junk fees”—hidden charges added late in transactions.

These same consumer protection principles underpin cases against major retailers, as seen in the Walmart class action lawsuit where shoppers alleged systematic pricing errors that led to a $45 million settlement paying customers an average of $25.97 each.

Similar Hidden Fee Lawsuits: How They Compare

Vince Camuto “Route Package Protection” lawsuit (2025): Nearly identical to the Corkcicle case. Designer lifestyle brand Vince Camuto was sued earlier in 2025 for automatically adding “Route Package Protection” fees to customers’ carts without consent. That case is ongoing in California federal court with the same legal theories Fischer is using against Corkcicle.

Grubhub “service fees” lawsuit (2024): Grubhub settled for $3.5 million after customers claimed the food delivery platform added hidden service fees and marketing fees without proper disclosure. Average payments were $20-$40 per customer.

Ticketmaster “Order Processing Fee” litigation (ongoing): Multiple lawsuits allege Ticketmaster adds mandatory “Order Processing Fees” that aren’t disclosed until final checkout, violating consumer protection laws.

Airbnb “Service Fee” class action (2021): Settled for $91 million after guests claimed Airbnb concealed service fees until late in the booking process. Average payments were approximately $30 per class member.

The outcomes of these hidden fee cases demonstrate courts take consumer protection seriously when companies add charges customers didn’t authorize. Just as Verizon’s class action settlement promised customers $15-$100 but delivered as little as $2.37 due to pro rata reductions, the final Corkcicle settlement payouts will depend on total claims filed and settlement negotiation.

What Happened at Checkout: The Customer Experience

Based on customer complaints and the lawsuit allegations, here’s what apparently happens when you buy from Corkcicle.com:

Step 1: You browse Corkcicle’s website and add a $35 tumbler to your cart.

Step 2: You proceed to checkout and enter shipping information.

Step 3: You review your order. The price shows as $35 + tax + shipping.

Step 4: Right before you click “Complete Purchase,” a $1.50 “Delivery Guarantee” charge suddenly appears—or it doesn’t appear at all and only shows up in your confirmation email.

Step 5: You complete your purchase, assuming you’re paying $35 + tax + shipping.

Step 6: Your credit card is charged $36.50 + tax + shipping. That extra $1.50? Delivery Guarantee you never agreed to.

Step 7: Days later, you notice the charge and contact Corkcicle customer service.

Step 8: Corkcicle tells you that you should have opted out of the protection, or that the charge was disclosed (even though you never saw it), or that they can’t refund it because it’s provided by a third party.

This checkout manipulation tactic—adding charges at the last possible moment—is precisely what regulators and courts have targeted in recent consumer protection enforcement actions, including cases against major carriers like AT&T, which faced a $177 million class action lawsuit for allegedly hiding administrative fees in billing statements.

Corkcicle’s Likely Defense Arguments

While Corkcicle hasn’t yet responded to the lawsuit, based on similar cases, the company will probably argue:

Disclosure was adequate. Corkcicle will claim the Delivery Guarantee fee was disclosed during checkout, perhaps in small text or as a pre-checked box customers could uncheck.

Customers benefited from protection. The company may argue customers received valuable package protection worth more than $1.50, especially given carrier reliability issues.

Terms of service authorized the charge. Corkcicle might point to language in their terms and conditions stating they may add fees for additional services.

Opt-out was available. The company could claim customers had the option to decline the protection but either missed it or forgot they agreed to it.

Third-party service, not Corkcicle’s fee. Corkcicle might argue they’re merely facilitating a third-party shipping insurance service and aren’t directly profiting from the $1.50 charge.

Industry standard practice. Many e-commerce sites offer shipping protection. Corkcicle may claim their practices match industry norms.

The problem with these defenses: If the fee was truly disclosed and optional, why do dozens of customers report identical experiences of never seeing an opt-in or opt-out choice? Why do BBB complaints consistently mention the same issue?

What Legal Experts Say About the Corkcicle Case

Consumer protection attorney Michael Roberts: “These last-minute fee cases are strong for plaintiffs when the company can’t produce clear evidence customers saw and agreed to the charge. If Corkcicle’s checkout process buries the fee or adds it post-confirmation, that’s textbook deceptive practice.”

E-commerce law specialist Jennifer Walsh: “The Vince Camuto case filed earlier this year sets up a pattern. If multiple retailers are using the same Route-style shipping protection with identical consumer complaints, we’re looking at a systemic issue in e-commerce checkout design.”

Class action attorney David Chen: “These cases typically settle. The fees are small—$1.50 per transaction—but multiply that by hundreds of thousands of orders and you have significant money plus bad publicity. Most companies settle for $500,000-$2 million and agree to make checkout changes.”

Former FTC attorney Susan Martinez: “The FTC has made junk fees a priority. They define junk fees as charges that are hidden from consumers until late in the buying process. This Corkcicle fee fits that definition perfectly.”

The FTC’s War on Junk Fees

In 2023-2024, the Federal Trade Commission launched aggressive enforcement against “junk fees”—hidden charges companies add late in transactions when customers are unlikely to back out.

FTC targets include:

• Concert ticket “service fees” disclosed only at checkout
• Hotel “resort fees” not mentioned in advertised rates
• Rental car “convenience charges” added at pickup
• Airline “seat selection fees” required for families to sit together
• Subscription “processing fees” for cancellations

The FTC’s position: Consumers have a right to know the full price upfront. Companies that hide fees until checkout—when customers have already invested time and emotional energy in the purchase—engage in deceptive practices.

Corkcicle’s alleged practice of adding a $1.50 delivery fee without clear upfront disclosure aligns exactly with what the FTC considers problematic junk fees. The same regulatory pressure that forced changes in ticketing and hospitality industries is now reaching e-commerce.

Timeline of Corkcicle Class Action Developments

December 27, 2025: Anna Fischer files class action complaint in California federal court alleging Corkcicle charges hidden delivery fees without consent.

January-March 2026 (projected): Corkcicle will file a motion to dismiss or answer the complaint. Discovery begins if the case proceeds.

April-June 2026 (projected): Plaintiffs file motion for class certification. Court decides whether to certify the case as a class action.

Summer 2026-2027 (projected): If certified, discovery continues. Depositions, document production, expert witnesses. Settlement negotiations likely occur.

2027-2028 (projected): If no settlement, trial preparation and potential trial. More likely: settlement before trial.

Post-settlement: Settlement administrator sends notice to class members. Claims period opens. Court holds final approval hearing. Payments distributed 3-6 months after final approval.

Total timeline estimate: 18-36 months from filing to settlement payments, assuming the case settles (which 95%+ of class actions do).

How to Check If You Were Charged the Hidden Fee

Review your Corkcicle receipts. Look for:

• “Delivery Guarantee” charge ($1.50)
• “Shipping Protection” fee
• “Package Protection” charge
• Any line item separate from standard shipping costs

Check your email confirmations. Search your email for “Corkcicle” and open order confirmation emails. Look for itemized charges.

Review credit card statements. Compare the total charged to your card versus the product price + tax + standard shipping. If there’s a $1.50 discrepancy, that’s likely the Delivery Guarantee fee.

Call your credit card issuer. Request transaction detail for any Corkcicle purchase. The merchant detail may show the breakdown of charges.

Contact Corkcicle customer service. Call (407) 270-3344 or email [email protected] and ask for an itemized receipt showing all charges for your order.

What To Do If You Were Charged the Hidden Fee

Document everything. Save:

• Order confirmation emails
• Receipts
• Credit card statements showing the charge
• Screenshots of current Corkcicle checkout process (if the fee is still being added)
• Any correspondence with Corkcicle customer service

Don’t dispute the charge yet. If you dispute with your credit card company now, you might be excluded from the class action settlement later. Wait until the case develops further.

Monitor the case. Bookmark the lawsuit case number (2:25-cv-10568) and check PACER periodically for updates. Or watch consumer protection news sites like Top Class Actions and ClassAction.org.

Wait for class notice. If the case achieves class certification and settles, a settlement administrator will send notice to all class members. This typically happens 1-2 years after filing.

File a complaint. Report Corkcicle to:

• Federal Trade Commission: reportfraud.ftc.gov
• California Attorney General: oag.ca.gov/contact/consumer-complaint-against-business-or-company
• Better Business Bureau: bbb.org/file-a-complaint

Filing complaints creates an official record and may prompt regulatory investigation, similar to how Shein faced multiple enforcement actions after consumer complaints about hidden fees and unauthorized charges reached critical mass.

How Much Could Class Members Receive?

Settlement estimates (speculative, based on similar cases):

If Corkcicle settles for $1-$2 million:

• Settlement fund after attorney fees (33%): $670,000 – $1.34 million
• Minus administrative costs: ~$620,000 – $1.26 million
• Divided by 100,000 class members: $6.20 – $12.60 per person

If Corkcicle settles for $3-$5 million:

• Net settlement fund: ~$1.9 million – $3.2 million
• Divided by 100,000 class members: $19 – $32 per person

Realistic expectation: $10-$25 per person who files a claim.

This matches the pattern from other hidden fee settlements. The CVS class action lawsuit settled for $1 million with no proof of purchase required, demonstrating that even without receipts, affected consumers can receive compensation when companies violate consumer protection laws.

Why such small amounts? Class actions distribute money among many people. $1.50 per transaction sounds small, but multiply by hundreds of thousands of purchases and it becomes significant. However, when divided back among class members, individual payouts are modest.

The real value: Forcing companies to change their practices. Even if you get $15, Corkcicle (and competitors watching the case) will think twice before implementing similar hidden fee schemes.

What Happens Next in the Litigation?

Corkcicle’s response (30-60 days): The company will either file a motion to dismiss (arguing the case lacks legal merit) or file an answer admitting or denying the allegations.

Discovery (6-12 months): If the case survives dismissal, both sides exchange evidence:

• Plaintiffs request Corkcicle’s checkout code, internal communications about the delivery fee, revenue data, customer complaints
• Corkcicle requests proof Fischer and other class members were actually charged without consent
• Depositions of Corkcicle executives, IT staff, customer service representatives
• Expert witnesses on e-commerce best practices and consumer psychology

Class certification motion (8-12 months): Plaintiffs ask the court to certify this as a class action. The court considers:

• Is the class large enough? (Yes—likely tens of thousands of customers)
• Do class members share common legal issues? (Yes—same fee, same checkout process)
• Are plaintiffs’ claims typical of the class? (Yes—everyone was charged $1.50)
• Will the class representatives adequately protect class interests? (Court decides)

Settlement negotiations (12-24 months): Most class actions settle. Private mediation occurs. Parties negotiate:

• Total settlement amount
• Changes to Corkcicle’s checkout process
• Claims process and payment method
• Attorney fees

Final approval (24-30 months): Court holds fairness hearing. Class members can object. Judge approves or rejects settlement. If approved, payments begin 3-6 months later.

Can You Opt Out and Sue Individually?

Yes, but it’s rarely worth it. Once the case is certified as a class action, you’ll receive notice explaining your options:

Option 1: Stay in the class (do nothing). You’ll automatically receive whatever settlement payment class members get. You give up your right to sue Corkcicle separately.

Option 2: Opt out. You preserve your right to sue Corkcicle individually or join a different lawsuit. You won’t receive any class action settlement payment.

Why opting out usually doesn’t make sense: Individual lawsuits cost $10,000-$50,000 in attorney fees. Unless you were charged hundreds of times (maybe you run a business that orders Corkcicle products regularly), your individual damages are too small to justify separate litigation.

When opting out might make sense: If you have unique damages beyond the $1.50 fee—for example, you ordered Corkcicle products for your business, were charged the fee hundreds of times, and can prove significant financial harm.

Surprising Facts About Delivery Guarantee Fees

They’re usually provided by third-party companies, not the retailer. Services like Route, Navidium, and ShipInsurance partner with e-commerce sites to offer package protection. The retailer gets a commission—often 30-50% of the $1.50 fee.

Insurance you probably don’t need. If a package is lost or damaged, consumers already have protection:

• Credit card companies offer purchase protection
• Sellers are responsible for delivery under most consumer protection laws
• Carriers like UPS, FedEx, and USPS have insurance for lost packages
• PayPal and other payment platforms offer dispute resolution

The “last-click” trick. Many sites add the delivery fee as a pre-checked box right before the “Complete Purchase” button. Consumers click through quickly, missing the checkbox. By the time they realize, the purchase is complete.

Opt-out is buried. Even when disclosed, the opt-out option is often in tiny gray text that blends into the background, or requires unchecking a nearly invisible box.

Profit margin is huge. Actual cost to provide the insurance is pennies. Most of the $1.50 goes to the service provider and retailer as profit.

Claim denial rates are high. According to consumer complaints, many customers who file claims for lost packages get denied because they didn’t save enough documentation or the “investigation” concludes delivery occurred.

Corkcicle’s BBB Complaints Reveal Pattern

Better Business Bureau complaints about Corkcicle paint a troubling picture beyond just the $1.50 fee:

Common themes:

• Customers charged the delivery guarantee fee but then told they can’t file claims because they “didn’t opt in” (even though the fee was auto-added)
• Packages showing suspicious tracking (in two cities 10 minutes apart, no photo verification)
• Customer service refusing refunds for non-delivered items because customers “declined shipping protection” they claim never appeared as an option
• Telling customers to file claims with UPS, knowing UPS Mail Innovations doesn’t allow claims

One particularly revealing complaint (April 2025): “Corkcicle continues to refuse to refund me and claim it was delivered but the delivery tracking is also suspect… They just took my money and won’t take accountability for their lack of delivery.”

Corkcicle’s response pattern: “As indicated on the website, we do suggest that every customer opts into the shipping protection offered by our partner since we do know that shipping errors can occur.”

The problem: Customers say there was no visible opt-in option. Corkcicle says customers should have opted in. Someone’s lying or the checkout process is so unclear that customers literally can’t see the option.

What This Means for Online Retail

Regulatory pressure is increasing. The FTC, state attorneys general, and consumer protection agencies are cracking down on hidden fees across industries.

Checkout transparency will become legally required. California already passed laws requiring “all-in pricing” for certain industries. Expect similar laws for e-commerce.

Pre-checked boxes are dying. Courts consistently rule that automatically selected options—especially for charges—violate consumer protection laws unless disclosure is crystal clear.

Route and similar services are in the crosshairs. Multiple lawsuits now target e-commerce sites using these third-party shipping protection services. Expect more litigation and potential regulatory action.

Competitors are watching. Every major e-commerce brand that uses similar tactics is monitoring these cases. Settlements will force industry-wide changes.

The same consumer protection evolution that transformed airline fee disclosures, hotel resort fees, and ticket service charges is now reaching e-commerce checkout processes. Companies that adapt early avoid lawsuits. Those that don’t—like Corkcicle—become examples.

How To Stay Informed About the Case

Check PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records): Visit pacer.gov and search for case number 2:25-cv-10568. Documents are $0.10/page. You can see all filings, motions, and court orders.

Monitor class action news sites:

• Top Class Actions (topclassactions.com)
• ClassAction.org
• JDSupra class action section

Set a Google Alert: Google “Corkcicle class action” and create an alert for new results. You’ll get emails when news breaks.

Follow plaintiff attorneys: KJC Law Group (kjclawgroup.com) will likely post updates about the case on their website.

Watch for settlement administrator website: If the case settles, a dedicated website will be created with claim forms, FAQs, and deadlines. This typically happens 12-18 months after filing.

FAQ: Corkcicle Class Action Questions

Is there a settlement yet? 

No. The lawsuit was just filed on December 27, 2025. Settlement negotiations typically don’t begin until 12-18 months after filing, after discovery and class certification.

Do I need to file a claim now? 

No. The case hasn’t been certified as a class action yet and there’s no settlement. If it settles, you’ll receive notice with instructions for filing a claim.

How do I know if I’m in the class? 

If you ordered from Corkcicle.com and were charged a “Delivery Guarantee” or similar shipping protection fee, you’re likely a class member. The exact class definition will be determined during class certification.

Will I get my $1.50 back? 

If the case settles, you’ll likely receive more than $1.50 due to interest, penalties, and deterrent damages. Expect $10-$25 per person based on similar settlements.

How long will this take? 

Class actions typically take 2-4 years from filing to final payment. Expect settlement payments in 2027-2028 if the case follows typical timelines.

Can I still shop at Corkcicle? 

Yes, but watch your checkout carefully. Document whether you’re given a clear choice about shipping protection.

What if I was charged multiple times? 

Save documentation of all charges. Some settlement structures pay more for multiple purchases or allow claims for each affected transaction.

Do I need an attorney? 

No. Class action lawsuits work on behalf of all class members. You don’t need to hire your own attorney. If you want to opt out and sue individually, then you’d need an attorney.

What if Corkcicle already refunded me? 

You might still be part of the class. Past refunds don’t necessarily exclude you from class membership, though it may affect your recovery amount.

Is this similar to other cases? 

Yes. This mirrors the Vince Camuto lawsuit over Route Package Protection and resembles dozens of other hidden fee cases in online retail and other consumer industries, including cases examined in settlements like MyChart class action lawsuits where healthcare systems paid $31.50-$35 per patient for sharing private data without consent.

Bottom Line: Hidden Fees Are Unlawful—Even $1.50 Ones

Corkcicle’s alleged practice of auto-adding a $1.50 delivery fee without clear consent violates consumer protection laws—not because $1.50 is a lot of money, but because consumers have the right to know what they’re paying for before completing a purchase.

The amount doesn’t matter. Whether it’s $1.50 or $150, if a company adds charges customers didn’t authorize, that’s illegal under California consumer protection statutes and likely violates federal laws too.

For consumers: This lawsuit is about principle as much as money. Companies shouldn’t be allowed to sneak fees onto your bill and hope you don’t notice. Even if you ultimately receive only $15 from a settlement, the lawsuit forces corporate accountability.

For Corkcicle: The company faces significant reputational damage, legal fees likely exceeding $1 million even if they settle, and potential changes to their entire checkout system. All to collect $1.50 per order.

The lesson: Transparency pays. Companies that clearly disclose optional fees and let customers make informed choices avoid lawsuits. Companies that add charges customers don’t notice or agree to become defendants.

If you purchased from Corkcicle and were charged a delivery guarantee fee you never authorized, document it. Save your receipts. Watch for class notice. And remember: class actions exist precisely for situations like this—where individual damages are small but collective harm is significant.

The $1.50 Corkcicle charges you doesn’t seem like much. But multiply it by 500,000 orders, and you’re looking at $750,000 in potentially unauthorized charges. That’s why consumer protection laws exist, why class actions matter, and why this lawsuit—regardless of individual payout amounts—serves an important purpose in keeping e-commerce fair and transparent.

Stay informed. Document your purchases. And the next time you see a surprise charge at online checkout, ask yourself: “Did I actually agree to this, or is this the next Corkcicle?”

About the Author

Sarah Klein, JD, is a licensed attorney and legal content strategist with over 12 years of experience across civil, criminal, family, and regulatory law. At All About Lawyer, she covers a wide range of legal topics — from high-profile lawsuits and courtroom stories to state traffic laws and everyday legal questions — all with a focus on accuracy, clarity, and public understanding.
Her writing blends real legal insight with plain-English explanations, helping readers stay informed and legally aware.
Read more about Sarah