T-Mobile $200 Gift Card Lawsuit—Customers Say Promotional Offers Denied After Meeting Requirements, California Class Action Filed November 2025
A proposed class action lawsuit alleges that T-Mobile has failed to honor its promises to issue $200 gift cards to consumers who purchase new phone lines or devices as part of a promotional offer. If you bought new T-Mobile service expecting a promotional gift card that never arrived, you may be part of a widespread pattern the lawsuit calls a “broader, uniform policy” of advertising incentives T-Mobile never intended to honor.
The case, filed November 12, 2025, in California federal court (Case No. 5:25cv3031), claims T-Mobile uses these promotional gift card offers to drive sales while “systematically” failing to deliver the promised rewards—leaving customers financially worse off than if they’d never trusted the promotion in the first place.
What T-Mobile Allegedly Promised
According to the 10-page false advertising lawsuit, the plaintiff, a California resident, purchased multiple new phone lines based on a T-Mobile promotion that offered a $200 gift card for each line of service opened.
The lawsuit describes a June 2024 in-store transaction where a T-Mobile representative confirmed the customer would receive $400 total in gift cards—$200 for each of two new phone lines—within approximately 10 weeks. The customer wouldn’t have opened the new lines without this financial incentive, making the gift cards a material inducement for the purchase.
When the promotional period ended and no gift cards arrived, the customer contacted T-Mobile. The suit claims that even though the consumer met the offer’s requirements, the company did not provide him with the promised gift cards and denied the existence of the promotion.
T-Mobile didn’t just fail to deliver—they allegedly claimed the promotion never existed, despite their own employee having confirmed it at the point of sale.
This Isn’t an Isolated Incident
The plaintiff states that through his own online research, he discovered similar consumer complaints describing T-Mobile’s alleged failure to honor promotional offers.
A quick search of T-Mobile community forums reveals frustrated customers asking “How do I claim my $200 promotional gift card?” and complaining about promised Visa gift cards that never materialized. The volume of complaints suggests this isn’t a one-time mistake—it’s allegedly a pattern.
The plaintiff claims that the company’s misrepresentations are part of a “broader, uniform policy” of advertising gift card promotions to increase sales while “systematically” failing to deliver on these promises.
In plain English: the lawsuit alleges T-Mobile uses fake promotional offers as bait to lock customers into new service contracts, knowing full well they won’t honor the promised incentives.
The Deceptive Marketing Allegations
“[T-Mobile] created the false impression—through its employees and marketing practices—that such promotions were active, valid, and would be honored upon purchase, despite having no intention or ability to fulfill them,” the case reads.
This isn’t about fine print or technical eligibility requirements. The lawsuit alleges T-Mobile’s own employees confirmed the promotions at the point of sale, customers met all stated requirements, and T-Mobile still refused delivery while denying the promotions ever existed.
If proven, this crosses the line from contract dispute into potential fraud territory. Similar to cases like the Celsius Drink Lawsuit SETTLEMENT, Get Your $250 Payout Before The Deadline Passes, where false advertising claims resulted in substantial settlements, T-Mobile could face significant liability for systematically misleading customers.
Legal Claims Under California Law
The lawsuit asserts violations of the California Unfair Competition Law (UCL), which prohibits:
- Fraudulent business practices
- Unlawful business practices
- Unfair business practices
California’s consumer protection laws are among the nation’s strongest. Companies cannot make promotional promises to induce purchases and then deny those promises ever existed. The UCL allows consumers to seek:
- Restitution (refund of money paid based on false promises)
- Injunctive relief (court orders forcing T-Mobile to honor promotions or stop making false ones)
- Disgorgement of profits (forcing T-Mobile to return money earned through deceptive practices)
Who May Be Eligible for This Class Action
While the lawsuit is in early stages with no class certification yet, potential class members likely include:
- California residents who purchased new T-Mobile phone lines or devices based on promotional gift card offers
- Customers who met all stated promotional requirements but never received promised gift cards
- Both new and existing T-Mobile customers who activated additional lines based on promotional incentives
- Customers who received promotional offers in-store, online, or through other T-Mobile marketing channels
The class period and specific promotions covered will be defined if the court certifies a class. However, customers who purchased T-Mobile service between 2024-2025 based on $200 gift card promotions should preserve all documentation now.
Related article: Polymarket Illegal Sports Betting Class Action Filed—Platform Accused Of Operating Unlicensed “Payday-Style” Gambling Under Guise Of “Prediction Market”
What You Should Do Now
If you purchased T-Mobile service expecting a promotional gift card:
Document everything immediately. Gather:
- Your T-Mobile service agreement and account records showing when you added lines
- Any promotional materials, emails, texts, or in-store signage describing the gift card offer
- Names of T-Mobile employees who confirmed the promotion
- Records of your attempts to claim the gift card or complaints to T-Mobile
- Screenshots of similar promotional complaints from T-Mobile community forums
Calculate your damages. If you purchased service specifically because of a $200 or $400 promotional offer you never received, that represents real financial harm. You paid for service you wouldn’t have bought without the promised incentive.
Don’t let T-Mobile gaslight you. If a company denies a promotion ever existed despite you having documentation or witness confirmation, that’s a red flag for systematic deceptive practices rather than honest mistakes.
T-Mobile’s Pattern of Consumer Protection Violations
This isn’t T-Mobile’s first rodeo with consumer protection lawsuits. The company has faced multiple class actions over the years:
- A 2024 lawsuit alleging T-Mobile raised prices on “price lock guarantee for life” plans after promising rates would never increase
- A 2023 data breach settlement affecting 76 million consumers
- An FTC enforcement action that resulted in $90 million in refunds for unauthorized third-party charges on customer bills
The FTC case is particularly relevant. According to the FTC, T-Mobile allowed other companies to add charges—typically $9.99 per month—to its customers’ phone bills without their consent. To settle the lawsuit, T-Mobile agreed to pay at least $90 million for refunds.
Companies with patterns of consumer protection violations face heightened scrutiny from courts and regulators. If T-Mobile is found to have systematically advertised fake promotions, the damages could extend far beyond just delivering the promised gift cards.
What Happens Next
The lawsuit was filed November 12, 2025, making it extremely recent. Typical next steps include:
Months 1-6: T-Mobile will likely file a motion to dismiss. The court will decide whether the allegations, if proven, state valid legal claims.
Months 6-18: If the case survives dismissal, plaintiffs will move for class certification. The court will determine whether this represents a class of similarly situated customers or just an individual dispute.
Months 18-36: Discovery phase where plaintiffs’ attorneys obtain T-Mobile’s internal records about promotional policies, gift card fulfillment rates, and employee training on promotional offers.
Potential Settlement: Many consumer protection class actions settle rather than going to trial. Similar false advertising settlements have resulted in payouts ranging from partial refunds to full compensation plus statutory penalties.
Your Legal Rights
Even if you signed a T-Mobile service agreement with an arbitration clause, California courts have held that unconscionable arbitration clauses may be unenforceable, especially when they prevent consumers from pursuing class action remedies for systematic fraud.
Save all documentation now. Class action notices typically arrive 12-24 months after filing, and by that point, many customers have lost crucial evidence.
If you experienced substantial damages—for example, you added multiple lines expecting $200-$400 in gift cards that never arrived—consider consulting a consumer protection attorney about individual claims in addition to the class action.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the T-Mobile gift card lawsuit about?
The November 2025 lawsuit alleges T-Mobile advertised $200 promotional gift cards to induce customers to purchase new phone lines, then systematically failed to deliver the promised gift cards and denied the promotions ever existed.
Am I eligible to join this class action?
The class hasn’t been certified yet, but likely eligible members include California residents who purchased T-Mobile service based on promotional gift card offers between 2024-2025 and never received the promised gift cards despite meeting requirements.
What compensation could I receive?
Potential compensation hasn’t been determined. Similar false advertising cases have resulted in full refunds of the promotional value plus additional statutory damages, potentially $200-$400 per unredeemed promotional offer plus penalties.
Do I need proof of the promotional offer?
Documentation strengthens claims significantly. Save promotional emails, text messages, in-store signage photos, service agreements mentioning promotions, and records of conversations with T-Mobile employees confirming the offers.
Can I participate if I’m not in California?
This specific lawsuit is filed under California law for California residents. However, if the alleged practice was nationwide, separate class actions may be filed in other states or as a multi-state federal class action.
Last Updated: February 15, 2026
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For guidance on your specific situation, consult with a qualified consumer protection attorney.
Know your rights: When companies use promotional offers to induce purchases then deny those promotions ever existed, that’s not just bad customer service—it’s potentially fraudulent business practice that consumer protection laws exist to punish.
Stay informed, stay protected. — AllAboutLawyer.com
About the Author
Sarah Klein, JD, is a licensed attorney and legal content strategist with over 12 years of experience across civil, criminal, family, and regulatory law. At All About Lawyer, she covers a wide range of legal topics — from high-profile lawsuits and courtroom stories to state traffic laws and everyday legal questions — all with a focus on accuracy, clarity, and public understanding.
Her writing blends real legal insight with plain-English explanations, helping readers stay informed and legally aware.
Read more about Sarah