Bad Bunny Lawsuit, Reggaeton Star Faces $16M Voice Theft Claim Days Before Super Bowl LX – Third Woman Sues Over Unauthorized Recordings 2026
Bad Bunny faces a $16 million lawsuit filed January 6, 2026, alleging he used a woman’s voice without permission on two hit songs spanning seven years. Tainaly Y. Serrano Rivera claims the reggaeton superstar exploited her voice recording on “Solo de Mí” (2018) and “EoO” (2025) without consent, contracts, or compensation—marking the third voice recording lawsuit against Bad Bunny since 2023.
The lawsuit dropped just weeks before his highly anticipated Super Bowl LX halftime performance on February 9, 2026 at Levi’s Stadium.
What Is The Bad Bunny Lawsuit About?
Rivera alleges producer Roberto “La Paciencia” Rosado asked her to record the phrase “Mira, puñeta, no me quiten el perreo” (roughly: “Look, damn it, don’t take away my dancing”) when they were theater students at Interamerican University of Arecibo in 2018.
She claims she was never told the recording would be used commercially, never signed contracts, and never received payment. Yet that exact voice clip appears prominently on Bad Bunny’s breakthrough 2018 track “Solo de Mí” from his debut album X 100PRE and again on “EoO” from his Grammy-winning 2025 album Debí Tirar Más Fotos.
The phrase has since become a signature element at Bad Bunny concerts and appears on official merchandise.
Who Filed The Lawsuit And Against Whom?
Plaintiff: Tainaly Y. Serrano Rivera
Defendants:
- Bad Bunny (Benito Antonio Martínez Ocasio)
- Rimas Entertainment LLC (his record label)
- Roberto J. Rosado (producer “La Paciencia”)
Court: San Juan Court of First Instance, Puerto Rico
Filing Date: January 6, 2026
Damages Sought: $16 million
Rivera’s attorneys are the same legal team that represented Carliz De La Cruz Hernández in her 2023 voice recording lawsuit against Bad Bunny—suggesting coordinated legal strategy.
The Legal Claims Explained
Puerto Rico’s Moral Copyright Law
This protects creators’ rights to attribution and compensation for artistic contributions. Rivera argues her voice constitutes creative work requiring proper credit and payment.
Right to One’s Own Image Law
In Puerto Rico, this extends to voice recordings. Using someone’s distinctive voice commercially without permission violates their publicity rights—similar to protections in Ed Sheeran Lawsuit In-Depth Look At The Thinking Out Loud Copyright Case.
Unjust Enrichment
When one party unfairly profits from another’s contributions without compensation, they must provide restitution. Rivera claims Bad Bunny earned millions while she received nothing.
Pattern Of Voice Recording Lawsuits
This marks Bad Bunny’s third voice theft lawsuit in three years:
1. Carliz De La Cruz Hernández (March 2023): Bad Bunny’s ex-girlfriend sued for $40 million, claiming he used her voice on “Pa Ti” and “Dos Mil 16” without permission. When his team offered $2,000 for rights in May 2022, she refused. Court documents show they used the recording anyway. Status: Still pending in Puerto Rican courts.
2. Román Carrasco Delgado (January 2026): 84-year-old homeowner sued for $6 million after Bad Bunny featured his hand-built salmon-colored house in the “Debí Tirar Más Fotos” short film and recreated it for 30 concerts without proper consent. He received only $5,200 despite his home becoming a tourist attraction. Status: Failed settlement negotiations, litigation ongoing.
3. Tainaly Y. Serrano Rivera (January 2026): Current $16M voice recording lawsuit. Status: Early litigation stages.
Current Case Status (February 2026)
Court Appearance: Bad Bunny and Rimas Entertainment have been summoned to appear in court in May 2026.
Defendant Response: As of February 8, 2026, Bad Bunny has not publicly commented on Rivera’s lawsuit. His representatives did not respond to requests for comment.
Producer’s Admission: According to court filings, producer Rosado allegedly admitted the use was unauthorized.
Timeline Of Events
- 2018: Rivera records the phrase at Rosado’s request while students
- December 2018: “Solo de Mí” releases on X 100PRE featuring Rivera’s voice
- January 2025: “EoO” releases on Debí Tirar Más Fotos with same voice clip
- January 6, 2026: Rivera files $16M lawsuit
- February 1, 2026: Bad Bunny wins six Grammy nominations
- February 9, 2026: Super Bowl LX halftime performance scheduled
- May 2026: Court appearance scheduled
Super Bowl Controversy
Bad Bunny’s halftime show has faced political backlash. President Donald Trump and supporters criticized his political stances and called for the NFL to replace him—though the NFL confirmed he’ll perform as scheduled.
The lawsuit adds legal drama to an already controversial performance, similar to tensions surrounding Anna’s Archive Lawsuit Spotify $13 Trillion Suit And Massive Copyright Case.
How To Stay Updated On This Case
Access Court Records: Puerto Rico’s Unified Judicial Information System (SIJC) provides public docket access. Search by defendant name “Benito Antonio Martínez Ocasio” or case number once publicly available.
Follow Legal News: Rolling Stone, Billboard, Entertainment Weekly, and AllAboutLawyer.com cover Bad Bunny’s legal developments.
What Happens Next
Immediate Timeline:
- February 9, 2026: Super Bowl halftime performance
- May 2026: Court appearance for Bad Bunny and defendants
- 2026-2027: Discovery process, depositions, potential settlement negotiations
Legal experts note Rivera’s case is strengthened by the precedent from De La Cruz’s ongoing lawsuit and the fact that producer Rosado allegedly admitted unauthorized use.
If Rivera prevails, it could establish stronger protections for voice recordings in Puerto Rico, similar to how Raygun Lawsuit Breakdancer Defends Her Brand And Intellectual Property Rights strengthened performer protections.
FAQs
What is the Bad Bunny lawsuit about?
Bad Bunny faces a $16 million lawsuit alleging he used Tainaly Y. Serrano Rivera’s voice without permission on “Solo de Mí” (2018) and “EoO” (2025), violating her publicity and privacy rights under Puerto Rico law.
When was this lawsuit filed?
January 6, 2026 in San Juan Court of First Instance, Puerto Rico—just weeks before Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl halftime show.
Who is involved in this lawsuit?
Plaintiff Tainaly Y. Serrano Rivera sued defendants Bad Bunny, Rimas Entertainment, and producer Roberto Rosado for unauthorized commercial use of her voice recording.
What are the main allegations?
Violation of Puerto Rico’s Moral Copyright Law, Right to One’s Own Image Law, and unjust enrichment for profiting from Rivera’s voice without consent or compensation.
What is the current status of this case?
Active litigation. Bad Bunny and defendants are summoned to appear in court in May 2026. No settlement has been reached as of February 2026.
How much money is Bad Bunny being sued for?
$16 million for publicity rights violations, privacy violations, and unjust enrichment.
Is this Bad Bunny’s only legal case?
No. He faces two other ongoing lawsuits: Carliz De La Cruz’s $40M voice recording case (filed 2023) and Román Carrasco’s $6M house exploitation case (filed January 2026).
Last Updated: February 8, 2026
Disclaimer: This article provides general information about the Bad Bunny lawsuit and is not legal advice. Lawsuit allegations have not been adjudicated and Bad Bunny has not publicly responded to the claims.
Next Steps: If you’re a creator whose voice, image, or intellectual property was used without permission, document everything (recordings, messages, contracts) and consult an entertainment attorney immediately. Puerto Rico’s statute of limitations for publicity rights claims is typically 1-3 years.
Stay informed, stay protected. — AllAboutLawyer.com
About the Author
Sarah Klein, JD, is a licensed attorney and legal content strategist with over 12 years of experience across civil, criminal, family, and regulatory law. At All About Lawyer, she covers a wide range of legal topics — from high-profile lawsuits and courtroom stories to state traffic laws and everyday legal questions — all with a focus on accuracy, clarity, and public understanding.
Her writing blends real legal insight with plain-English explanations, helping readers stay informed and legally aware.
Read more about Sarah