Will Smith Lawsuit, Tour Violinist Claims “Grooming” and Wrongful Termination After Hotel Intrusion

Will Smith faces allegations of sexual harassment, retaliation, and wrongful termination in a lawsuit filed December 30, 2025, by violinist Brian King Joseph in Los Angeles County Superior Court. Joseph alleges he was fired from Smith’s 2025 “Based on a True Story” tour days after reporting a disturbing hotel room intrusion in Las Vegas that left HIV medication, hospital paperwork, and a handwritten note addressed to him.

Smith’s attorney Allen B. Grodsky called the allegations “false, baseless, and reckless” and vowed to use all legal means to address the claims. The case remains in early litigation stages with no settlement discussions reported as of January 2026.

What Is the Will Smith Lawsuit About?

The Tour Violinist and Professional Relationship

Brian King Joseph, a professional electric violinist who appeared on Season 13 of “America’s Got Talent,” was hired by Will Smith in November 2024 to perform at a San Diego concert. Joseph was subsequently invited to join Smith’s 2025 European and UK tour supporting his “Based on a True Story” album released in March 2025.

According to the complaint, Smith and Joseph developed what the lawsuit describes as an unusually close professional relationship. The lawsuit alleges Smith told Joseph multiple times, “You and I have such a special connection, that I don’t have with anyone else,” along with other similar expressions suggesting an affinity for the violinist.

Joseph performed with Smith and his band at House of Blues Mandalay Bay in Las Vegas in March 2025. It was during this Las Vegas stop that the central incident occurred that led to Joseph’s termination and subsequent lawsuit.

The Las Vegas Hotel Room Intrusion Allegations

The lawsuit centers on events at Joseph’s Las Vegas hotel room on March 20, 2025. According to the complaint, Joseph’s bag containing his hotel room key went missing for several hours during rehearsals. Tour management eventually returned the bag after what Joseph describes as an extended retrieval process.

When Joseph returned to his room that evening, he alleges he discovered evidence that someone had unlawfully entered. Items Joseph found included wipes, a beer bottle, an earring, a red backpack, a bottle of HIV medication bearing another person’s name, hospital discharge paperwork for someone Joseph didn’t know, and a handwritten note.

The note allegedly read: “Brian, I’ll be back no later [sic] 5:30, just us (drawn heart), Stone F.” According to the complaint, Joseph feared an unknown individual would return to engage in sexual acts with him.

Joseph immediately took photographs of the items, notified hotel security, called a local non-emergency police line, and reported the incident to Smith’s representatives. Mandalay Bay officials found no signs of forced entry into the room. Joseph requested and received a room change, then returned home the following day.

Will Smith faces allegations of sexual harassment, retaliation, and wrongful termination in a lawsuit filed December 30, 2025, by violinist Brian King Joseph in Los Angeles County Superior Court. Joseph alleges he was fired from Smith's 2025 "Based on a True Story" tour days after reporting a disturbing hotel room intrusion in Las Vegas that left HIV medication, hospital paperwork, and a handwritten note addressed to him.

Sexual Harassment and Wrongful Termination Claims

Several days after Joseph reported the hotel intrusion, he alleges a representative from Smith’s touring company Treyball Studios Management called to terminate his employment. The lawsuit quotes the representative allegedly saying, “Everyone is telling me that what happened to you is a lie, nothing happened, and you made the whole thing up.”

Joseph claims the representative blamed him for the termination, accusing him of fabricating the entire hotel intrusion incident. Another violinist was hired to replace Joseph on the tour, which continued through Europe and the UK through summer 2025.

The complaint accuses Smith of “deliberately grooming and priming Mr. Joseph for further sexual exploitation” based on Smith’s prior statements to the musician. Joseph’s attorney, Jonathan J. Delshad, argues the items left in the hotel room “point to a pattern of predatory behavior.”

Joseph brings claims for retaliation under California employment law—arguing he was fired for reporting workplace safety hazards—wrongful termination, and sexual harassment. The complaint alleges Joseph suffered PTSD, mental illness, and economic loss because of the termination.

What You Must Know About Employment Retaliation Claims

California Workplace Safety Retaliation Law

California Labor Code Section 6310 prohibits employers from retaliating against employees who report workplace safety hazards or violations. Retaliation means adverse employment actions—like termination, demotion, or harassment—taken because an employee exercised protected rights.

Joseph’s lawsuit frames the hotel intrusion as a workplace safety hazard that he properly reported to his employer. Under California law, if Joseph can prove his termination occurred because he reported this safety concern, Smith and Treyball Studios Management could be liable regardless of whether the underlying safety complaint was ultimately substantiated.

Similar to the Jason Derulo sexual harassment lawsuit where an aspiring artist alleged career retaliation after refusing advances, Joseph’s case highlights how power dynamics in the entertainment industry can lead to wrongful termination claims when employees report misconduct.

Sexual Harassment Without Direct Contact

Joseph’s lawsuit alleges sexual harassment even though he doesn’t claim Smith directly touched him or made explicit sexual advances. California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) recognizes hostile work environment sexual harassment, which occurs when unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature creates an intimidating, hostile, or offensive working environment.

Courts evaluate whether a reasonable person in the employee’s position would find the environment hostile based on the totality of circumstances. Factors include frequency of conduct, severity, whether it’s physically threatening or humiliating, and whether it unreasonably interferes with work performance.

Joseph’s allegations that Smith made statements suggesting a “special connection” combined with the hotel intrusion could potentially support hostile environment claims if proven. However, establishing Smith’s direct involvement in the hotel incident will likely be critical to Joseph’s case success.

Common Misconceptions About Entertainment Industry Lawsuits

Many assume employment lawsuits involving tours and performances don’t qualify for California worker protections. However, touring musicians, crew members, and performers hired by California-based companies or performing in California may be covered by state employment laws regardless of where termination occurs.

Smith’s touring company Treyball Studios Management is the co-defendant because California law holds employers liable for supervisory employees’ discriminatory conduct. If Joseph can prove company representatives participated in harassment or retaliation, Treyball faces vicarious liability even if Smith personally didn’t make the termination decision.

The entertainment industry faces increasing scrutiny over workplace harassment. The Blake Lively sexual harassment case against Justin Baldoni proceeds to trial March 2026 after surviving dismissal motions, demonstrating courts take entertainment industry harassment claims seriously when properly supported by evidence.

What to Do Next If Following the Will Smith Case

How to Track Case Developments

The lawsuit was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court and is publicly accessible through the court’s online portal. Search for “Brian King Joseph v. Will Smith” or case number once assigned to view filed documents and hearing schedules.

Follow legal news sources covering entertainment litigation including The Hollywood Reporter, Variety, and Deadline Hollywood. These outlets typically report on major motion deadlines, settlement negotiations, and trial dates for high-profile celebrity cases.

Smith’s legal team will likely file responsive pleadings within 30 days of service. Watch for motions to dismiss arguing California lacks jurisdiction, that Joseph signed arbitration agreements waiving court rights, or that his claims fail as a matter of law.

When Sexual Harassment Claims Warrant Legal Consultation

If you experienced similar circumstances—unwelcome sexual conduct, reporting harassment or safety concerns, then facing termination shortly after—consult an employment attorney immediately. California provides strong protections for employees who report workplace violations.

Document everything: Save emails, text messages, and written communications about your complaints and subsequent adverse actions. Note dates, times, witnesses, and specific statements made by supervisors or colleagues. Take screenshots of relevant social media posts or messages before they disappear.

California’s statute of limitations for FEHA claims requires filing administrative complaints with the Civil Rights Department within three years of the last discriminatory act. Missing this deadline can bar your claims permanently.

Official Resources for Employment Discrimination

Visit California’s Civil Rights Department (formerly DFEH) at calcivilrights.ca.gov to file workplace discrimination or harassment complaints. The CRD investigates claims and can issue right-to-sue notices allowing you to proceed in court.

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) handles federal employment discrimination claims. While Joseph’s lawsuit involves state law claims, the EEOC provides resources at eeoc.gov about recognizing harassment and understanding your rights.

For touring performers and musicians facing harassment, the Actors’ Equity Association and American Federation of Musicians offer resources and can connect members with legal assistance for workplace violations.

FAQs About the Will Smith Lawsuit

What is the Will Smith lawsuit about?

The Will Smith lawsuit involves violinist Brian King Joseph suing Smith and his touring company Treyball Studios Management for sexual harassment, retaliation, and wrongful termination. Joseph alleges he was fired from Smith’s 2025 tour days after reporting that someone unlawfully entered his Las Vegas hotel room leaving HIV medication, hospital papers, and a note. He claims Smith’s team accused him of lying and terminated him in retaliation.

Who is suing Will Smith?

Brian King Joseph, a professional electric violinist who appeared on Season 13 of “America’s Got Talent,” filed the lawsuit. Joseph was hired in November 2024 to perform on Smith’s “Based on a True Story” tour and album. He performed with Smith in San Diego and Las Vegas before the alleged March 2025 hotel intrusion led to his termination.

What are the specific allegations against Will Smith?

Joseph alleges Smith made statements suggesting an unusually close connection, which the lawsuit characterizes as “deliberately grooming and priming Mr. Joseph for further sexual exploitation.” The complaint claims someone associated with Smith’s tour accessed Joseph’s hotel room, left disturbing items including HIV medication and a sexual note, then Smith’s representatives fired Joseph when he reported the incident, calling him a liar.

What is Will Smith’s response to the lawsuit?

Will Smith’s attorney Allen B. Grodsky issued a statement calling Joseph’s allegations “false, baseless, and reckless.” Grodsky said the allegations are “categorically denied” and that Smith’s legal team will use all available legal means to address the claims and ensure the truth is brought to light. No detailed legal response has been filed yet as of January 2026.

Is this related to the Oscars slap incident?

No. This lawsuit is completely unrelated to the March 2022 incident where Will Smith slapped Chris Rock at the Academy Awards. That incident resulted in Smith’s resignation from the Academy and a 10-year ban from attending Oscars ceremonies, but no civil lawsuit was filed by Chris Rock. This current case involves entirely separate allegations from Smith’s 2025 music tour.

How much money is Brian King Joseph seeking?

The lawsuit requests that damages be determined by a jury rather than specifying an exact amount. Joseph seeks compensatory damages for economic losses including lost tour income and future career opportunities, as well as damages for emotional distress, PTSD, and mental illness he alleges resulted from the wrongful termination. Punitive damages may also be sought to punish and deter similar conduct.

What happens next in the Will Smith lawsuit?

Smith and Treyball Studios Management must file responsive pleadings within 30 days of being served. They may file motions to dismiss, compel arbitration, or challenge jurisdiction before answering the complaint. If the case survives these preliminary challenges, parties will enter discovery where they exchange evidence. Settlement negotiations may occur at any stage, or the case could proceed to trial, which typically takes 12-24 months in Los Angeles County Superior Court.

Last Updated: January 18, 2026

Disclaimer: This article provides general information about the Will Smith lawsuit for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For guidance specific to your employment situation, consult a qualified employment law attorney licensed in your state.

Experiencing workplace harassment or retaliation? Document incidents immediately and consult an employment attorney to understand your rights and legal options.

Stay informed, stay protected. — AllAboutLawyer.com

About the Author

Sarah Klein, JD

Sarah Klein, JD, is a licensed attorney and legal content strategist with over 12 years of experience across civil, criminal, family, and regulatory law. At All About Lawyer, she covers a wide range of legal topics — from high-profile lawsuits and courtroom stories to state traffic laws and everyday legal questions — all with a focus on accuracy, clarity, and public understanding.
Her writing blends real legal insight with plain-English explanations, helping readers stay informed and legally aware.
Read more about Sarah

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *