Jake Kidder lawsuit, Michigan Man’s Car Wash Arrest Sparks Fourth Amendment Lawsuit—When a Cigarette Became “Evidence” of Drug Dealing
What Happened in the Jake Kidder Car Wash Arrest?
On September 14, 2024, Jake Kidder was washing his truck at a self-serve car wash in Marysville, Michigan when an off-duty police officer witnessed a Black man hand him something and called for backup, believing it was drugs. Kidder insists his coworker Ronnie Heinz simply handed him a cigarette.
Here’s what unfolded:
When on-duty St. Clair County Sheriff’s deputies arrived, they detained Kidder for over an hour, searched both him and his truck, found no drugs, then forcibly removed him from his vehicle and arrested him.
Kidder now faces three felony counts of assaulting, battering, and resisting police officers, plus one felony count of possession of methamphetamine/ecstasy—all charges he denies.
Kidder has filed a lawsuit against the officers and department for wrongful arrest, illegal search, unlawful seizure, and excessive force, claiming his Fourth Amendment rights were violated.
Current Status: The criminal charges remain pending as of November 2025, while Kidder’s civil rights lawsuit moves forward.
Here’s what makes this case impossible to ignore: Body camera footage shows officers muting their audio for approximately 20 minutes during one part of the encounter and 10 minutes during another—exactly when transparency matters most. When Kidder posted the full body camera and surveillance footage to his YouTube channel in March 2025, it ignited a national debate about police overreach, racial bias in policing, and whether a routine traffic-stop tool has become a weapon for harassment.
Who Is Jake Kidder and Why This Case Matters
Jake Kidder is a Marysville, Michigan resident whose truck displayed a “Back the Blue” sticker—an ironic detail that highlights how police misconduct can affect anyone, regardless of political leanings.
His coworker Ronnie Heinz, the Black man in the Cadillac who allegedly handed Kidder drugs according to the off-duty officer, told police he handed Kidder nothing and invited officers to search his vehicle—which they declined.
This case matters because it exposes systemic issues in modern policing: racial profiling, the misuse of “reasonable suspicion,” body camera manipulation, and how quickly a mundane interaction can escalate into felony charges.
The Legal Claims: Breaking Down Kidder’s Fourth Amendment Lawsuit
Kidder’s lawsuit centers on violations of the Fourth Amendment, which protects Americans from unreasonable searches and seizures. His claims include:
Unlawful Detention and Terry Stop Violations
Civil rights attorney John H. Bryan, who analyzed the case on his YouTube channel “The Civil Rights Lawyer,” explained that officers must satisfy requirements for what’s called a Terry stop—an investigative detention similar to a traffic stop but applicable to pedestrians.
The 1968 Supreme Court case Terry v. Ohio established that police may stop and frisk someone without a warrant if they have “reasonable suspicion” that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime, based on “specific and articulable facts”—not merely a hunch.
The problem? Bryan argues officers violated Kidder’s Fourth Amendment rights by searching him and his truck based solely on what an off-duty officer claimed he saw—a secondhand report without independent corroboration.
Illegal Search Without Probable Cause
Videos show officers telling Kidder that if he had nothing to hide, he should allow the search. After finding nothing during the extensive search, one officer told Kidder he would be “stripped down buck naked” at jail to find hidden drugs.
The Fourth Amendment typically requires probable cause—a higher standard than reasonable suspicion—to conduct a full vehicle search. The sergeant told deputies they had probable cause based on their “training and experience” and the off-duty officer’s report.
Excessive Force
After more than an hour of back-and-forth, during which Kidder repeatedly asserted his constitutional rights, officers yanked him from his vehicle and slammed him to the ground before arresting him.
What the Law Says: Fourth Amendment Standards
Understanding Kidder’s case requires knowing two legal thresholds:
Reasonable Suspicion (Lower Standard)
Under Terry v. Ohio, officers need reasonable suspicion—specific, articulable facts suggesting criminal activity—to briefly stop and question someone. If they reasonably believe the person is armed and dangerous, they can conduct a limited pat-down for weapons.
Probable Cause (Higher Standard)
For arrests and full vehicle searches, officers need probable cause—enough evidence that a reasonable person would believe a crime was committed. This is a significantly higher bar than reasonable suspicion.
A lawyer reviewing Kidder’s case emphasized that officers need reasonable cause, not just a hunch, to stop or search someone.
Recent Developments and Case Timeline
September 14, 2024: Initial arrest occurs at Marysville car wash
March 26, 2025: Kidder posts body camera and surveillance footage to his YouTube channel for the first time
April 2025: Civil rights attorney John H. Bryan analyzes the case on his YouTube channel, bringing national attention to the incident
Mid-2025: Kidder launches a GoFundMe campaign to raise funds for legal defense, stating that “St Clair county Michigan doesn’t play fair with law enforcement and judges all on the same team”
November 2025: Criminal charges remain pending; civil rights lawsuit proceeds
The Broader Implications: When Police Tools Become Weapons
This case raises urgent questions about policing in America:
Body Camera Accountability
The muting of body cameras undermines transparency and raises questions about whether officers properly followed the law—a troubling pattern when accountability matters most.
Racial Profiling
The fact that an off-duty officer’s suspicion was triggered by seeing a Black man hand something to a white man reflects broader patterns of racial bias in policing. Heinz invited officers to search his Cadillac, but they declined—suggesting their real target was Kidder once the supposed drug transaction didn’t materialize.
Terry Stop Mission Creep
Terry v. Ohio was designed as a limited tool for officer safety during brief investigative stops. Kidder’s case shows how easily it morphs into prolonged detentions and exhaustive searches based on flimsy evidence.
What This Means for Your Rights
If you’re stopped by police:
Document everything. Kidder livestreamed body camera footage afterward, which proved crucial for public accountability and his lawsuit.
Know the difference between detention and arrest. If you’re not free to leave, you’re being detained—which requires reasonable suspicion. Arrest requires probable cause.
You can refuse consent to search. Officers told Kidder that refusing meant he had something to hide—a common but legally meaningless pressure tactic.
Body cameras can be manipulated. Audio muting during critical moments defeats the purpose of transparency, though video footage may still capture important evidence.
Assert your rights calmly. Kidder repeatedly asserted his constitutional rights, which officers used as justification for his arrest—yet standing up for your rights is legal, even if police find it inconvenient.
Frequently Asked Questions About the Jake Kidder Lawsuit
What charges is Jake Kidder facing?
St. Clair County court records show three felony counts of assaulting, battering, and resisting police officers, plus one felony count of possession of methamphetamine/ecstasy. Kidder denies all charges and maintains no drugs were found.
Has the lawsuit been settled?
As of November 2025, no settlement has been announced. Both the criminal case and civil rights lawsuit remain active.
What is a Terry stop?
A Terry stop is an investigative detention, similar to a traffic stop but applicable when you’re on foot. It requires reasonable suspicion based on specific, articulable facts.
Can police mute body cameras?
Policies vary by department, but muting audio during encounters undermines transparency and raises legal questions about whether proper procedures were followed.
Where can I see the body camera footage?
Kidder shared the full incident on his YouTube channel in March 2025, showing the entire confrontation.
The Jake Kidder case isn’t just about one man and one car wash. It’s about the space between what police are legally allowed to do and what they actually do—and whether Americans can trust the system to hold them accountable when that gap becomes a chasm. As this lawsuit unfolds, it will test whether Fourth Amendment protections mean anything when an off-duty officer’s hunch can justify an hour-long detention, a vehicle torn apart, and felony charges that could destroy someone’s life.
About the Author
Sarah Klein, JD, is a licensed attorney and legal content strategist with over 12 years of experience across civil, criminal, family, and regulatory law. At All About Lawyer, she covers a wide range of legal topics — from high-profile lawsuits and courtroom stories to state traffic laws and everyday legal questions — all with a focus on accuracy, clarity, and public understanding.
Her writing blends real legal insight with plain-English explanations, helping readers stay informed and legally aware.
Read more about Sarah