RealPage Lawsuit, DOJ Settlement Ends Rent Price-Fixing Scheme—What Renters Must Know NOW
What You Need to Know Right Now
The RealPage lawsuit is a massive antitrust case where the U.S. Department of Justice accused the software company of helping landlords coordinate rent prices through its algorithm-based pricing software. The DOJ claimed RealPage enabled price-fixing by collecting confidential rental data from competing property managers and using it to recommend higher rents across millions of apartments.
Who’s involved? RealPage Inc. (a Texas-based property management software company), the DOJ, eight state attorneys general, and private plaintiffs representing renters who paid inflated rents. Major landlords including Greystar, Equity Residential, and dozens of others used RealPage’s YieldStar software.
What happened? The DOJ filed suit in August 2024, claiming RealPage’s revenue management software violated antitrust laws by facilitating collusion among competing landlords. The software allegedly used non-public pricing data from rival properties to recommend rents that kept prices artificially high rather than allowing free-market competition.
The settlement (November 2025): RealPage agreed to stop using competitors’ confidential data in real-time pricing, age all training data by 12 months, remove features that discourage price decreases, accept a 3-year court-appointed monitor, and cooperate with ongoing DOJ cases against landlords. Critically, RealPage pays no fines and admits no wrongdoing.
Can you get compensation? Yes, potentially. Separate class action lawsuits are seeking damages for renters who paid inflated rent. If you leased an apartment after October 2018 from a property using RealPage software, you may qualify for compensation estimated between 15-21% of total rent paid—potentially $5,000+ per renter. Multiple settlements totaling $141.8 million have been reached with 26 landlords, with Greystar paying $50 million alone.
Current status: The DOJ settlement awaits federal court approval. Private class action claims remain open for renters to file. Lawsuits against landlords who used RealPage continue.
The Shocking Reality: How an Algorithm Drove Up Your Rent 7%
Picture this: You’re apartment hunting, frustrated because every complex you visit quotes nearly identical sky-high rents. It’s not a coincidence. In some markets, renters paid between 5% and 7% more than they would have in a competitive environment because landlords were secretly feeding their pricing data into the same algorithm—and following its recommendations to keep rents elevated.
For the average renter paying $1,500 monthly, that’s an extra $75-$105 per month, or $900-$1,260 per year, straight from your pocket to landlords’ profits. Multiply that by millions of renters across the country, and you’re looking at a housing affordability crisis partly driven by coordinated pricing software.
The RealPage lawsuit exposed how technology designed to “optimize” rental pricing actually enabled what prosecutors call algorithmic collusion—a 21st-century version of the smoke-filled room where competitors set prices together.
How RealPage’s Algorithm Worked (And Why It’s Illegal)
RealPage offered property managers a seemingly helpful tool: YieldStar software that uses artificial intelligence to recommend rental prices. But here’s what made it problematic:
The Data Collection Process:
- Competing landlords shared “nonpublic, competitively sensitive information” about rental prices and lease terms with RealPage
- RealPage aggregated this confidential data from rival properties
- The algorithm analyzed current market conditions using competitors’ real-time pricing
- Software generated rent recommendations based on what other landlords were charging
Why This Violates Antitrust Law:
In a free market, competing businesses must set prices independently. The DOJ’s complaint alleged that rental companies “shared sensitive information about rental prices and used algorithms to coordinate to keep the price of rent high”. This coordination—even through software—violates Section 1 of the Sherman Act, which prohibits agreements that restrain trade.
Think of it this way: If five restaurant owners met and agreed to all charge $20 for burgers, that’s clearly illegal price-fixing. RealPage allegedly accomplished the same result using software instead of a meeting room, but the legal principle remains the same.
The Acceptance Rate Problem:
RealPage controlled about 80% of the revenue management software market, giving it massive influence over rental pricing nationwide. Court documents reveal landlords accepted the software’s pricing recommendations 80-90% of the time, effectively eliminating competitive pricing decisions.
Breaking Down the DOJ Settlement Terms
On November 24, 2025, the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division filed a proposed settlement to resolve claims against RealPage. Here’s what RealPage must do:
Immediate Changes:
- Stop using competitor data: Cease having its software use competitors’ nonpublic, competitively sensitive information to determine rental prices in runtime operation
- Age training data: Only use historical data aged at least 12 months for model training
- Broaden geographic analysis: Cannot analyze market effects below state level (previously operated block-by-block)
- Remove anti-competitive features: Redesign or eliminate tools that limited price decreases or aligned pricing between competitors
- End data surveys: Stop conducting market surveys collecting sensitive pricing information
- Restrict meetings: Cannot discuss non-public data or pricing strategies in RealPage meetings
Oversight Requirements:
- Accept 3-year court-appointed monitor to ensure compliance
- Cooperate with DOJ’s ongoing lawsuits against landlords who used the software
What RealPage Avoids:
- No financial penalties or damages paid to the government
- No admission of wrongdoing or liability
- No disruption to customer operations
Why This Matters for Renters, Landlords, and Property Managers
For Renters:
This settlement should restore competitive pricing in rental markets. When landlords make independent pricing decisions instead of coordinating through software, you benefit from genuine price competition. Properties competing for tenants may offer:
- Lower monthly rents
- Reduced security deposits
- Move-in specials and concessions
- More negotiating leverage for lease renewals
For Landlords and Property Managers:
RealPage stated the settlement “provides resolution and clarity for customers and the broader multifamily industry, ensuring the company’s revenue management solutions remain fully available, legally compliant, and aligned with evolving laws and policies”. Property managers can still use revenue management software, but they must:
- Make truly independent pricing decisions
- Avoid sharing confidential pricing data with competitors
- Ensure any software used doesn’t facilitate coordination
- Understand that algorithmic pricing isn’t illegal—but coordination through algorithms is
Broader Implications:
This case represents the DOJ’s first major enforcement action targeting algorithmic collusion. “Competing companies must make independent pricing decisions, and with the rise of algorithmic and artificial intelligence tools, we will remain at the forefront of vigorous antitrust enforcement,” said Assistant Attorney General Abigail Slater. Expect increased scrutiny of pricing algorithms across industries beyond housing—including hotels, healthcare, and e-commerce.
How to File a Claim and Get Your Money Back
Are You Eligible?
You may qualify for compensation if:
- You rented an apartment between October 18, 2018, and present
- Your landlord or property management company used RealPage’s revenue management software
- You experienced rent increases during your tenancy
The class action settlement covers “all persons and entities in the United States and its territories who paid rent on at least one multifamily residential real estate lease directly to any Owner, Managing Defendant, and/or Owner-Operator participating in RealPage’s Revenue Management Solutions”.
Major Landlords Already Settled:
The following companies have reached preliminary settlements (awaiting court approval):
- Greystar ($50 million)
- Simpson Property Group
- Avenue5
- Bell Partners
- Bozzuto
- Pinnacle
- Winn Companies
- 20+ additional defendants
Total settlements reached: 26 class settlements worth more than $141.8 million combined.
Step-by-Step Filing Process:
- Determine Your Eligibility
- Check if your landlord is among the settling defendants
- Gather lease agreements showing rental dates and amounts
- Confirm your property was in a multifamily residential complex
- Contact Class Action Attorneys
- Hausfeld LLP is leading the federal class action ([email protected])
- Mason LLP and other firms are pursuing individual mass arbitration claims
- Many consumer attorneys offer free case evaluations
- Consider Your Options
- Join the class action: Easier process, but potentially smaller payout
- File individual claims: More work, but may potentially recover between 15-21% of apartment rent paid since 2016 in a settlement
- Mass arbitration: Some firms handle claims one-by-one for potentially higher compensation
- Watch for Settlement Notices
- The claims process is not yet open. Once a settlement website is established, information will be shared with eligible class members
- Monitor court filings for preliminary approval dates
- Deadlines typically range from 60-180 days after court approval
- Calculate Your Potential Recovery
For example, if you paid $1,500/month rent for 3 years (36 months):
- Total rent paid: $54,000
- 15-21% recovery: $8,100-$11,340 before legal fees
- After typical 25-33% legal fees: approximately $5,400-$8,500
Important Notes:
- The DOJ settlement with RealPage itself includes no monetary compensation for renters
- Private class action settlements provide the compensation pathway
- Additional landlords remain defendants with ongoing litigation
- You don’t need to prove you personally overpaid—class membership is based on using a RealPage property
Understanding Antitrust Law and Algorithmic Pricing
What Makes Price-Fixing Illegal?
The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 prohibits agreements among competitors to fix prices. Traditionally, this meant executives couldn’t meet to set prices. But technology has created new enforcement challenges.
The Algorithm Defense Doesn’t Work:
Companies argued that using software shields them from liability since there’s no “agreement” in the traditional sense. Courts and prosecutors rejected this. The DOJ emphasized that “software algorithms can be employed to fix prices—and this modern machinery may be easier and more effective than past methods of price fixing”. Using an algorithm doesn’t make coordination legal.
Key Legal Principles:
- Hub-and-Spoke Conspiracy: RealPage acted as the hub, with landlords as spokes sharing information through the central platform
- Conscious Parallelism: When competitors independently reach similar prices, that’s legal; when they coordinate through shared data, it’s not
- Vertical Agreements: Even agreements between RealPage (the vendor) and individual landlords can violate antitrust law
Similar Cases Creating Precedent:
The RealPage case isn’t isolated. Other algorithmic pricing lawsuits include:
- Casino hotels in Las Vegas and Atlantic City (pricing software)
- Amazon’s “Project Nessie” algorithm investigation
- Healthcare pricing coordination allegations
What RealPage Says (Their Defense)
RealPage President and CEO Dirk Wakeham stated: “We are convinced that RealPage is part of the solution to addressing the cost of housing, helping operators make informed, independent decisions in a complex housing market”.
The company maintains:
- Revenue management software itself is legal and beneficial
- The settlement formalizes product modifications already implemented
- No admission of wrongdoing was made
- There are “no financial penalties, damages, or findings or admissions of wrongdoing”
RealPage argues its software helps:
- Optimize occupancy rates
- Reduce vacant units
- Provide data-driven insights
- Improve housing market efficiency
However, critics counter that efficiency gains came at renters’ expense through coordinated higher pricing.
State-Level Enforcement and Nevada’s Groundbreaking Settlement
While the federal case grabbed headlines, Nevada Attorney General Aaron Ford announced on September 19, 2025, a first-of-its-kind settlement with RealPage, making Nevada the first state to reach an agreement regarding algorithmic rent pricing.
Nevada Settlement Terms:
- RealPage contributes $200,000 to Nevada-based nonprofits
- Funds support down payment assistance and rent reduction for residents
- Establishes precedent for state-level enforcement
Other states with active investigations or lawsuits:
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Minnesota
- Oregon
- Tennessee
- Washington
- Arizona
- District of Columbia
FAQ: RealPage Lawsuit and Settlement
How much money can I get from the RealPage settlement?
Based on claims by mass arbitration firms, renters may potentially recover between 15-21% of their apartment rent paid since 2016. For someone who paid $1,500 monthly for 5 years, that could mean $13,500-$18,900 before legal fees (approximately $5,184 after fees per the firms’ estimates).
Do I qualify if my rent never increased?
Yes. The case alleges rents were artificially inflated from the baseline, not just that increases were excessive. Even if your rent stayed the same, it may have been coordinated at a higher level than competitive markets would set.
Which landlords used RealPage software?
Major settling defendants include Greystar, Simpson Property Group, Avenue5, Bell Partners, Bozzuto, Pinnacle, and Winn Companies. Additional defendants remain in litigation, including Equity Residential and Brookfield Management. Contact class action attorneys to verify your specific landlord.
Is the settlement final?
No. The DOJ settlement awaits federal court approval under the Tunney Act. The court will accept public comments for 60 days before deciding whether the agreement serves the public interest.
Can landlords still use pricing algorithms?
Yes, but they cannot use competitors’ nonpublic, competitively sensitive information to determine rental prices. Software using only the landlord’s own historical data or broadly available market information remains permissible.
What if I currently rent from a RealPage property?
You’re still protected. The settlement requires RealPage to cease problematic practices immediately upon court approval. Continue documenting your rent amounts and lease terms in case additional compensation becomes available.
Are there deadlines to file a claim?
Not yet for the private class actions. The claims process has not opened. Monitor official settlement websites once they’re established. Typical deadlines range from 60-180 days after preliminary approval.
What’s the difference between the DOJ case and private lawsuits?
The DOJ case enforces antitrust law and stopped the illegal conduct through the settlement. Private class actions seek monetary damages for renters harmed by the price-fixing. Both are important—one stops the practice, the other compensates victims.
Similar Antitrust Cases and Legal Precedents
Hotel Pricing Algorithms:
Similar lawsuits allege casino hotels in Las Vegas and Atlantic City coordinated pricing through Rainmaker Group’s software. These cases could establish important precedents for how courts evaluate algorithmic pricing across industries.
Healthcare Price Coordination:
Major health insurers face allegations of using algorithms to coordinate pricing and reduce competition for provider payments.
E-commerce Dynamic Pricing:
Amazon faces scrutiny over “Project Nessie,” an algorithm that allegedly tested price increases to see if competitors would follow, then maintained higher prices when they did.
Key Legal Developments:
Courts are establishing that:
- Using algorithms doesn’t shield companies from antitrust liability
- Sharing competitively sensitive information through third-party platforms can create illegal agreements
- High adoption rates of algorithmic recommendations may evidence coordination
- Companies retain responsibility for how third-party software uses their data
What Happens Next: Timeline and Future Developments
Immediate (November-December 2025):
- Federal court publishes DOJ settlement in Federal Register
- 60-day public comment period begins
- Private class action settlements await preliminary approval
Short-term (Q1-Q2 2026):
- Court decides whether to approve DOJ settlement
- If approved, 3-year monitorship begins
- Private class action claims process likely opens
- Additional landlord defendants may settle or proceed to trial
Long-term (2026-2029):
- Monitoring compliance with settlement terms
- Distribution of class action settlement funds to renters
- Potential additional enforcement actions against other industries using pricing algorithms
- Congressional hearings and possible legislation addressing algorithmic pricing
How This Settlement Changes the Rental Market
For the Housing Market:
Restoring competitive pricing should help address housing affordability. When landlords compete independently:
- Vacant units incentivize price reductions
- New renters can negotiate better terms
- Renewal pricing becomes more flexible
- Concessions and move-in specials return
For Technology Companies:
Software providers must ensure their tools don’t facilitate coordination. Expect:
- Increased compliance reviews of pricing algorithms
- More transparency about data sources
- Disclaimers emphasizing independent decision-making
- Industry-wide adoption of best practices
For Regulators:
Assistant Attorney General Abigail Slater emphasized: “Competing companies must make independent pricing decisions, and with the rise of algorithmic and artificial intelligence tools, we will remain at the forefront of vigorous antitrust enforcement”. This signals aggressive enforcement ahead across sectors using AI-powered pricing.
Expert Analysis and Legal Commentary
Legal experts view the RealPage settlement as establishing crucial precedent. The case demonstrates:
- Technology amplifies coordination risk: Algorithms make collusion easier and more effective than traditional methods
- Data sharing creates liability: Even indirect information exchange through third parties can violate antitrust law
- Market power matters: RealPage’s 80% market share magnified the anticompetitive effects
- Compliance is critical: Companies must proactively ensure software doesn’t facilitate coordination
Settlement critics argue RealPage got off too lightly with no financial penalties. Supporters counter that stopping the harmful conduct quickly benefits renters more than lengthy litigation would.
Resources and Where to Get Help
Official Government Sources:
Legal Assistance:
- Hausfeld LLP (Federal Class Action): [email protected]
- State Attorneys General Consumer Protection Divisions
- Local tenant rights organizations
- Legal aid societies for low-income renters
Monitoring Your Rights:
- Check your state Attorney General’s website for local updates
- Join tenant advocacy groups tracking the case
- Document all rental agreements and payment records
- Stay informed about settlement approval dates
Conclusion: What This Means for American Renters
The RealPage lawsuit represents a watershed moment in antitrust enforcement for the AI age. For decades, renters watched helplessly as rents climbed with little explanation. This case exposed how technology designed to optimize pricing crossed the line into illegal coordination.
The settlement stops RealPage’s most problematic practices and establishes that algorithmic collusion faces the same legal scrutiny as traditional price-fixing. But the real test comes in enforcement and compensation.
Key Takeaways:
- Rental pricing algorithms must respect antitrust law
- Renters harmed by coordinated pricing can seek compensation
- Technology doesn’t exempt companies from legal accountability
- Competitive markets benefit consumers—even with sophisticated software
If you rented from a property using RealPage software since 2018, monitor class action developments and consider filing a claim. The settlement may not undo years of inflated rent, but it ensures future renters benefit from genuine competition.
The message is clear: In America’s housing market, competition must be real—not coordinated through algorithms.
Last Updated: November 25, 2025
Disclaimer: This article provides legal information, not legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for guidance on your specific situation. Settlement terms remain subject to court approval.
Have questions about the RealPage lawsuit or need help determining your eligibility? Leave a comment below or contact a consumer protection attorney in your state.
About the Author
Sarah Klein, JD, is a licensed attorney and legal content strategist with over 12 years of experience across civil, criminal, family, and regulatory law. At All About Lawyer, she covers a wide range of legal topics — from high-profile lawsuits and courtroom stories to state traffic laws and everyday legal questions — all with a focus on accuracy, clarity, and public understanding.
Her writing blends real legal insight with plain-English explanations, helping readers stay informed and legally aware.
Read more about Sarah