RHOA Star Brit Eady Sues Bravo for $20M After Kenya Moore’s Explicit Photo Scandal—Network Accused of “Gendered Attack” and Sexual Harassment
Brittany “Brit” Eady filed a $20 million lawsuit against Bravo, NBCUniversal, Truly Original, and Endemol Shine North America on June 5, 2025, in New York State Supreme Court. The Real Housewives of Atlanta newcomer accuses the network of defamation, sexual harassment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and creating a hostile work environment after explicit photos were displayed at Kenya Moore’s hair salon opening and later aired on television.
The lawsuit stems from a June 6, 2024 incident where Moore presented posters showing graphic sexual images she claimed depicted Eady. Bravo aired the footage in April 2025 despite Eady’s repeated requests to see the photos beforehand—which she insists do not show her.
Who Is Brit Eady?
Brittany “Brit” Eady, 37, joined RHOA Season 16 as a newcomer bringing entrepreneurial credentials to the cast. Born October 9, 1987, in Roswell, Georgia, she started her career as a teen model appearing in Soulja Boy’s 2008 “Kiss Me Through the Phone” music video and films like “Lottery Ticket” (2010).
She transitioned from modeling to insurance entrepreneurship. In 2020, she founded her own Allstate agency, built it successfully for two years, then sold it. She now runs Agency Jump Start, coaching insurance agents and selling educational tools. She also launched a jewelry line called “Ten Twelve Fifty Nine (XXIILIX)” named after her late father’s birthdate.
Eady married investor and jet broker Michael Cunningham in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic. They opted for a courthouse ceremony instead of a traditional wedding and plan to hold a glamorous second ceremony. The couple welcomed daughter Jada Chanel on December 16, 2023.
The Kenya Moore Hair Spa Incident: What Happened?
On June 6, 2024, during filming for RHOA Season 16, Kenya Moore hosted a grand opening for her Kenya Moore Hair Spa. According to court documents, approximately 200 guests attended the event.
Eady arrived with flowers and a card apologizing for a previous altercation, attempting to make peace with Moore. Moore allegedly asked Eady to leave the event early. After Eady departed, Moore displayed posters featuring explicit photos of a woman performing oral sex. Moore claimed the images depicted Eady.
Cast members and guests witnessed the display. Some walked out immediately, recognizing the behavior as inappropriate. Bravo cameras captured the entire incident.
Eady was not present when the posters were shown. She learned about the incident later but didn’t see the actual images until nearly a year passed—when Bravo aired the episode on April 6, 2025.
The Legal Claims Explained
Eady’s lawsuit names Bravo Media LLC, NBCUniversal, Truly Original LLC, Endemol Shine North America, and an unidentified person as defendants. The case was filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York (index number currently unassigned).
The specific legal claims include:
- Defamation: The lawsuit alleges Bravo “falsely yet unmistakably implied” the graphic sexual photograph depicted Eady when the network knew or should have known it did not show her
- Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress: Court documents claim defendants willfully, intentionally, and recklessly produced, edited, and aired footage causing severe emotional harm
- Sexual Harassment: Eady accuses Bravo of subjecting her to “unwelcome, offensive, and sexualized behavior and comments based on her gender”
- Hostile Work Environment: The filing states Bravo required Eady to continue working after experiencing what she calls a “gendered attack,” creating inferior employment conditions because of her gender
- False Light: The lawsuit claims the episode’s presentation falsely portrayed Eady in a misleading and offensive manner
- Respondeat Superior: This claim holds employers liable for employees’ actions during work
The complaint emphasizes Bravo’s knowledge: “On information and belief, Defendants knew that the photograph did not depict [Eady], or, at the least, were reckless or grossly negligent in failing to learn that the photograph did not depict [Eady].”
Bravo Refused to Show Eady the Photos Before Airing
A critical element of the lawsuit centers on Bravo’s alleged refusal to accommodate Eady’s requests.
“Despite [Eady’s] repeated requests prior to the airing of the episode at issue that Defendants show her the photograph, Defendants refused to do so,” court documents state. This refusal meant Eady couldn’t verify or refute Moore’s claims before millions of viewers saw the broadcast.
The lawsuit argues this failure contributed directly to a hostile work environment. Bravo forced Eady to return to filming without addressing her concerns about the explicit imagery and false implications.
Kenya Moore’s Suspension and Exit from RHOA
Following the incident, Bravo took swift action against Moore. The network suspended her indefinitely in June 2024 after an internal investigation. By late June 2024, sources confirmed Moore would not return to RHOA Season 16.
Moore, 54, had been with the franchise since Season 5 and held her peach through Season 16 (except for Season 11). She was one of only two returning full-time housewives for the reboot season alongside Drew Sidora.
Moore posted cryptically on social media after her suspension, writing: “My heart is full and my conscience is clean. So many false claims hiding behind anonymous sources. All this conversation and no facts being reported.”
She denied engaging in revenge porn and claimed she would never distribute private images. Moore later appeared on the Tamron Hall show in November 2024, expressing regret: “Hindsight is always fifty, fifty,” she said, adding that she was “sorry” for what she did.
Despite the apology, Moore maintains she felt wronged by Bravo over disagreements about safety concerns and allegations that Eady made gun-related threats.
What Damages Is Brit Eady Seeking?
Eady’s legal team demands:
- At least $20 million in monetary damages for defamation, emotional distress, sexual harassment, and related claims
- Immediate removal of Episode 5 from all platforms, networks, and media outlets under defendants’ control
- A public statement from defendants acknowledging the false depiction of Eady
- Coverage of attorney fees and legal costs
- Punitive damages to deter similar future conduct
The $20 million figure reflects both compensatory and punitive damage requests aimed at holding Bravo accountable for what Eady characterizes as deliberate exploitation of a vulnerable cast member for ratings.
Timeline of Events
June 6, 2024: Kenya Moore hosts hair salon grand opening; displays explicit posters after Eady leaves event
June 2024: Bravo suspends Moore indefinitely following internal investigation; filming pauses temporarily
Late June 2024: Reports confirm Moore will not return to RHOA Season 16
November 2024: Moore appears on Tamron Hall show expressing regret for her actions
April 6, 2025: Episode 5 of RHOA Season 16 airs featuring footage of the incident; Bravo adds disclaimer about Moore’s suspension
June 5, 2025: Eady files lawsuit in New York State Supreme Court
June 6, 2025: News of the lawsuit breaks publicly; Eady announces she won’t attend Season 16 reunion (first Real Housewives newcomer to skip reunion in franchise history)
Brit Eady’s Instagram Statement
On the day her lawsuit was filed, Eady posted to Instagram addressing the scandal directly:
“As everyone is now aware, I’m not attending the reunion. This was my decision. The events of this season have devastated me, and while I cannot say much right now, I do want to set the record straight about one thing: the graphic sexual photo surrounding the events in Episode 5. That photo was not me.“
She continued: “As the episode makes clear, I did not see the photo at the time. Rather, I was made aware of the photo being presented at the event, and based on what I was told, assumed that it was somehow a photo of me—which is why I reacted in the way that I did. I do not know who was in that photo, but upon seeing it for the first time recently, I now know it was not me.”
Eady concluded: “I look forward to seeking accountability and moving past this dark part of my life.”
Her decision to skip the reunion made Real Housewives history—she’s the first franchise newcomer ever to miss their first season reunion taping.
How This Fits Into Broader Bravo Lawsuits
Eady’s case joins a growing list of legal actions against Bravo and its parent companies. The network faces mounting scrutiny over workplace conditions, alcohol consumption practices, and alleged exploitation of cast members.
Recent Bravo Lawsuits Include:
NeNe Leakes (April 2022): Former RHOA star sued Bravo, NBCUniversal, and Andy Cohen for racial discrimination, alleging the network fostered a culture allowing racially offensive behavior. The case remains active.
Leah McSweeney (February 2024): Real Housewives of New York City star filed a 109-page lawsuit claiming discrimination, hostile work environment, and retaliation related to her alcoholism disability. McSweeney accused producers of deliberately placing her in situations jeopardizing her sobriety. She alleges Bravo and Andy Cohen failed to provide reasonable accommodations despite knowing her addiction history. A federal judge denied Bravo’s motion to dismiss in May 2024, citing First Amendment concerns. The case continues.
Caroline Manzo (January 2024): Real Housewives of New Jersey alum sued Bravo, NBCUniversal, Warner Bros Entertainment, and Peacock over sexual assault allegations during Real Housewives Ultimate Girls Trip filming. Manzo claimed the defendants “allowed, condoned and even encouraged” misconduct. She accused Bravo of supplying cast members with alcohol to provoke outrageous behavior for ratings. The lawsuit includes over 16 claims, including sexual harassment and discrimination. The case remains pending.
Below Deck Crew Members (February 2025): Hair and makeup artist Samantha Suarez and camera operator Grey Duddleston filed a lawsuit against Bravo, Gary King, 51 Minds Entertainment, and Endemol Shine alleging sexual battery, hostile work environment, discrimination, and gender violence during Below Deck: Sailing Yacht Season 4 filming. They claim they were terminated and blacklisted for speaking out.
Faith Stowers: Former Vanderpump Rules cast member is suing Bravo for racism, sexual harassment, and physical assault after being blamed for a crime she didn’t commit and subsequently fired. The lawsuit is still active.
These cases share common themes: allegations that Bravo prioritizes dramatic content over cast member safety, fails to address misconduct appropriately, and creates hostile environments by encouraging alcohol consumption and controversial behavior.
University of Miami Law Review published an analysis titled “The Real Lawsuits of Bravo: How Labor Law Could Reshape Reality TV,” noting these battles could secure long-overdue rights and protections for reality TV stars who’ve long operated in a legal grey area.
Legal Precedents and Industry Implications
The Eady lawsuit could reshape how reality TV networks handle sensitive content and protect cast members from workplace harassment. Several legal principles come into play:
Defamation Standards: To prove defamation, Eady must show Bravo made false statements of fact, published them to third parties, caused damages, and acted with appropriate culpability (negligence for private figures, actual malice for public figures). The lawsuit argues Bravo knew or should have known the photos didn’t depict Eady.
Workplace Sexual Harassment Laws: Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and state laws, employers must maintain environments free from sexual harassment. The lawsuit claims forcing Eady to continue working after the incident created a hostile work environment based on her gender.
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress: This claim requires extreme and outrageous conduct that causes severe emotional distress. Courts have historically found such conduct must exceed all bounds of decency tolerated in a civilized society.
First Amendment Considerations: Bravo previously argued in the McSweeney case that editorial decisions about reality TV content are protected by First Amendment rights to tailor creative messages. However, a federal judge rejected this defense when balanced against discrimination claims.
If Eady prevails, the case could establish precedents requiring reality TV networks to:
- Obtain explicit consent before airing potentially defamatory content
- Provide cast members opportunities to review sensitive material before broadcast
- Implement stronger protections against workplace sexual harassment
- Face meaningful financial consequences for exploitation
What’s the Current Status of the Case?
As of November 2025, the Brit Eady v. Bravo lawsuit remains in early stages. The case was filed June 5, 2025, in New York State Supreme Court, County of New York. The index number was listed as “unassigned” in initial court documents, indicating the case was just entering the system.
Bravo has not issued a public statement responding to Eady’s lawsuit. Representatives for NBCUniversal, Truly Original, and Endemol Shine have also declined comment to media outlets.
Typical next steps in such cases include:
- Service of Process: Defendants must be formally served with the lawsuit
- Answer or Motion to Dismiss: Defendants typically respond within 20-30 days by filing an answer to the complaint or a motion to dismiss
- Discovery: If the case proceeds, parties exchange evidence, documents, and depositions
- Settlement Negotiations: Many high-profile cases settle before trial
- Trial: If no settlement is reached, the case would proceed to trial, though this typically takes 1-3 years
Episode 5 of RHOA Season 16 reportedly remains available for streaming as of November 2025, despite Eady’s demand for immediate removal.
Industry Context: Reality TV’s Reckoning
The entertainment industry faces increasing scrutiny over workplace conditions on reality television sets. Beyond Bravo, other networks face similar challenges:
Netflix’s “Love Is Blind” cast member Renee Poche filed a lawsuit seeking to render her contract null, potentially calling into question exploitative contracts across the industry.
The NLRB (National Labor Relations Board) is reviewing whether “Love Is Blind” cast members should be classified as employees rather than independent contractors. A ruling in their favor could reshape the entire reality TV industry.
Attorneys Bryan Freedman and Mark Geragos have led what they call a “Reality Reckoning,” representing multiple plaintiffs in lawsuits against reality TV production companies for what they describe as a “pattern and practice of grotesque and depraved mistreatment.”
These legal battles converge on several key issues:
- Should reality TV cast members be classified as employees with full legal protections?
- Do networks have a duty to protect cast members from exploitation, harassment, and unsafe conditions?
- Should reality TV be subject to greater labor law oversight?
- What role do non-disclosure agreements play in silencing victims?
The outcomes of these cases could fundamentally alter how reality television is produced, potentially securing workplace protections that have long been absent from the industry.
FAQ: Brit Eady Lawsuit Against Bravo
Q: What is Brit Eady suing Bravo for?
Brit Eady filed a $20 million lawsuit against Bravo, NBCUniversal, Truly Original, and Endemol Shine North America for defamation, sexual harassment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, hostile work environment, and false light related to explicit photos shown on Real Housewives of Atlanta.
Q: When was the Brit Eady lawsuit filed?
The lawsuit was filed on June 5, 2025, in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, exactly one year after the incident at Kenya Moore’s hair salon.
Q: What happened at Kenya Moore’s hair salon opening?
On June 6, 2024, Kenya Moore displayed posters with explicit sexual images at her salon opening, claiming they depicted Brit Eady. Approximately 200 people witnessed the display. Eady was not present when the posters were shown. Bravo later aired footage of the incident in April 2025.
Q: Did Bravo fire Kenya Moore?
Bravo suspended Kenya Moore indefinitely in June 2024 following an internal investigation. By late June 2024, it was confirmed Moore would not return to RHOA Season 16. Moore was not “fired” but decided to part ways with the show after disagreements over how the incident was handled.
Q: Are the photos actually of Brit Eady?
Eady emphatically denies she is the person in the explicit photos. In her lawsuit and public statements, she states: “That photo was not me.” Court documents allege Bravo knew or should have known the photos did not depict Eady.
Q: How much money is Brit Eady suing for?
Eady is seeking at least $20 million in damages, immediate removal of the episode from all platforms, a public statement acknowledging the false depiction, and coverage of legal fees.
Q: Has Bravo responded to the lawsuit?
As of November 2025, Bravo has not issued a public statement responding to Eady’s lawsuit. Representatives for NBCUniversal and production companies have declined to comment.
Q: Is this the first lawsuit against Bravo by a Real Housewives star?
No. NeNe Leakes, Leah McSweeney, Caroline Manzo, and others have filed lawsuits against Bravo in recent years alleging racial discrimination, sexual harassment, hostile work environments, and workplace misconduct. The Eady case is part of a broader pattern of legal challenges against the network.
Legal Disclaimer: This article provides legal information about the Brit Eady lawsuit against Bravo based on publicly available court documents, verified news sources, and legal filings current as of the publication date. It is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Case details, court rulings, and legal developments are subject to change as litigation proceeds. For specific legal advice regarding this case or similar matters, please consult with a qualified attorney. Always verify current case status and developments through official court resources and verified news sources.
Related Articles:
- Lisa Barlow Lawsuit Update: RHOSLC Star Confirms Multiple Cases Dismissed
- Caroline Manzo Lawsuit: Reality Star Sues Bravo Over Sexual Harassment Claims
- Entertainment Industry Lawsuits: Understanding Defamation and Workplace Harassment Claims
About the Author
Sarah Klein, JD, is a licensed attorney and legal content strategist with over 12 years of experience across civil, criminal, family, and regulatory law. At All About Lawyer, she covers a wide range of legal topics — from high-profile lawsuits and courtroom stories to state traffic laws and everyday legal questions — all with a focus on accuracy, clarity, and public understanding.
Her writing blends real legal insight with plain-English explanations, helping readers stay informed and legally aware.
Read more about Sarah